water quality protection
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

120
(FIVE YEARS 19)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 197-202
Author(s):  
Ionela Gabriela Bucşe ◽  
Mariana Ciobanu ◽  
Olimpia Ghermec

There is a crucial need to achieve a more sustainable management of the world's water resources due to serious water scarcity and water pollution. A whole series of problems are related to these needs, but the problem of water resources is one of the most prominent. This paper aims to point out certain solutions to address these issues, such as providing a framework for the concept of integrated management of water resources in Mehedinţi County. Water quality protection should be a permanent concern; therefore, every member of society must bring out his own conscious and responsible contribution. To this end, by all means of information or education, it is necessary to debate the social, economic and ecological importance of problems and actions in order to prevent and combat pollution of water resources.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Downing ◽  
Stephen Polasky ◽  
Sheila M. Olmstead ◽  
Stephen C. Newbold

AbstractSurface water is among Earth’s most important resources. Yet, benefit–cost studies often report that the costs of water quality protection exceed its benefits. One possible reason for this seeming paradox is that often only a narrow range of local water quality benefits are considered. In particular, the climate damages from water pollution have rarely been quantified. Recent advances in global water science allow the computation of the global methane emission from lakes caused by human nutrient enrichment (eutrophication). Here, we estimate the present value of the global social cost of eutrophication-driven methane emissions from lakes between 2015 and 2050 to be $7.5–$81 trillion (2015 $US), and in a case-study for one well-studied lake (Lake Erie) we find the global value of avoiding eutrophication exceeds local values of either beach use or sport fishing by 10-fold.


EDIS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha T. Howley ◽  
Steven P. Hohman ◽  
Alexander J. Reisinger

This new 6-page document is intended to provide Floridians and their communities with information on a specific management practice in stormwater ponds: the use of fountains and other aeration approaches. These practices may provide opportunities both to improve water quality within the pond and protect downstream water quality. Specifically, this document gives basic information on fountains and the pros and cons of fountain installation and use. In addition, we provide information for pond managers or community decision makers on how to best manage ponds for effective pollutant removal in the pond and downstream water quality protection. Written by Samantha T. Howley, Steven P. Hohman, and Alexander J. Reisinger, and published by the UF/IFAS Department of Soil and Water Sciences.https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ss695


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1575-1584
Author(s):  
Annbjørg Øverli Kristoffersen ◽  
Tore Krogstad ◽  
Anne Falk Øgaard

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2371
Author(s):  
Emilia Noel Ptak ◽  
Morten Graversgaard ◽  
Jens Christian Refsgaard ◽  
Tommy Dalgaard

The most significant source of nitrate pollution in the European Union (EU) is attributed to agricultural activities, which threaten drinking water, marine, and freshwater resources. The Nitrates Directive is a key feature of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), which seeks to reduce nitrate pollution from agricultural sources. Yet, weak compliance by Member States (MS) diminishes the legitimacy of the EU environmental acquis and undermines efforts to achieve environmental objectives. This study examines the nitrate management discourse in Poland to identify influencing factors that impact governance capacity and overall compliance performance. The empirical investigation is based on nine stakeholder interviews, three written correspondences, and a literature review that collectively comprise an evaluation study. A comparison in governance approaches between Poland and Denmark provides a calibration in assessing performance respective to another MS. The findings categorize both Poland and Denmark as “laggard” in WFD compliance. This case contributes new insights in identifying 6 enabling and 13 constraining factors affecting the ability of MS to fulfill their implementation duties. The findings demonstrate that divergent stakeholder views based on historical and cultural norms require a differentiated approach tailored to domestic conditions for effective fulfillment of the objectives set forth in EU environmental legislation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document