551 Outcomes of Sickle Cell Crisis in Relation to Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the United States: A US Population cohort study

Introduction This study aimed to quantify the impact of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on the mortality, morbidity, and resources utilization among children admitted with Sickle cell crisis (SCC) Methods This is a retrospective analysis using the 2016 and 2017 National Inpatient Sample Database. The Inclusion Criteria was a principal Diagnosis of SSC and age <18 years. OSA, as a Secondary Diagnosis, was identified using the appropriate ICD-10 CM codes. The Primary Outcomes were Inpatient Mortality, and secondary outcomes were: In-Hospital Length of Stay(LOS), Total hospitalization Cost, Blood transfusion (BT) requirement, and a requirement for Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We used Multivariate Linear/ logistic regression to adjust for confounders including age and sex. Results Out of 36,484 children with SSC included in the study, 1450 children had OSA (SCC+OSA). SSC-OSA and SSC+OSA groups did not differ in gender, household income, and hospital characteristics, but did so in age (11.3 vs 12.4; p <0.001). OSA was most common in the age group of 13–18 (54%) and lowest in 0–4 (2.4%). Compared to SSC-OSA, the SCC+OSA cohort had significantly higher odds of mortality (adjusted OR= 11.9, [95% Confidence Interval: 1.02- 138.8],p=0.04). Additionally, SSC+OSA cohort was associated with increased odds of IMV (aOR=5.24 [CI: 1.84 – 14.8], p=0.002), longer LOS (adjusted mean difference (aMD)=0.67 [CI-0.32 – 1.02], p=<0.001), and higher hospitalization Cost (aMD=2818.76 [CI-1680- 4157], p=<0.001). No difference in BT (aOR=0.94 [CI: 0.68 – 1.29], p=0.71) was noted. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the presence of OSA is associated with detrimental outcomes in SSC with higher in-hospital mortality, higher morbidity (Invasive mechanical ventilation rate), and higher resource utilization (LOS, total hospitalization cost). More attention to the screening, early diagnosis, and appropriate treatment of OSA is imperative to improve health outcomes in children with sickle cell disease. Support (if any):

Cost-Sharing Effects on Hospital Service Utilization Among Older People in Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan

Background: The cost-sharing impact on hospital service utilization of different services is a critical issue that has not been well addressed worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the cost-sharing effects based on income status on hospital service utilization of different services among elderly people in Japan and provide a comprehensive examination and discussion for the reasonability of a cost-sharing system. Methods: The data were extracted from the Latter-Stage Elderly Healthcare Insurance database in the fiscal year 2016. A total of 610 182 insured people aged ≥75 years old, with 155 773 hospitalization patients, were identified. Hospitalization rate, length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization cost were used to test the statistical significance among patients categorized by income levels. Generalized linear models for total hospitalization cost were constructed based on bed types to further assess different hospital service utilization. Results: For medical chronic care and psychiatric beds, which both required long-term care treatment, much higher hospitalization rates were observed in the patients with low- and middle-income levels than patients with high-income level. The LOS and total hospitalization cost of the patients with low- and middle-income levels were significantly higher than the patients with high-income level treated in medical chronic care and psychiatric beds. For psychiatric beds, the total hospitalization cost for patients with low-income level was significantly higher than that for patients with highincome level. Conclusion: The cost-sharing policy in Japan, especially the cap for out-of-pocket needs further determination. The importance of community-based care services needs to be emphasized, and the collaboration between hospitals and community-based care facilities should be enhanced.

Assessment of Risk Factors Associated With Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries and Impact on Health Care Utilization and Cost Outcomes in US Hospitals

Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI) are a societal burden and considered potentially preventable. Data on risk factors and HAPI burden are important for effective prevention initiatives. This study of the 2009-2014 US Premier Healthcare Database identified HAPI risk factors and compared outcomes after matching HAPI to non-HAPI patients. The cumulative incidence of HAPI was 0.28% (47 365 HAPI among 16 967 687 total adult inpatients). Among the matched sample of 110 808 patients (27 702 HAPI), the strongest risk factors for HAPI were prior PI (odds ratio [OR] = 12.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.93-13.15), prior diabetic foot ulcer (OR = 3.43, 95% CI = 3.20-3.68), and malnutrition (OR = 3.11, 95% CI = 3.02-3.20). HAPI patients had longer adjusted length of stay (3.7 days, P < .0001), higher total hospitalization cost ($8014, P < .0001), and greater odds of readmissions through 180 days (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.55-1.65). This study demonstrates how big data may help quantify HAPI burden and improve internal hospital processes by identifying high-risk patients and informing best practices for prevention.