Assessment of Risk Factors Associated With Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries and Impact on Health Care Utilization and Cost Outcomes in US Hospitals

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Dreyfus ◽  
Julie Gayle ◽  
Paul Trueman ◽  
Gary Delhougne ◽  
Aamir Siddiqui

Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI) are a societal burden and considered potentially preventable. Data on risk factors and HAPI burden are important for effective prevention initiatives. This study of the 2009-2014 US Premier Healthcare Database identified HAPI risk factors and compared outcomes after matching HAPI to non-HAPI patients. The cumulative incidence of HAPI was 0.28% (47 365 HAPI among 16 967 687 total adult inpatients). Among the matched sample of 110 808 patients (27 702 HAPI), the strongest risk factors for HAPI were prior PI (odds ratio [OR] = 12.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.93-13.15), prior diabetic foot ulcer (OR = 3.43, 95% CI = 3.20-3.68), and malnutrition (OR = 3.11, 95% CI = 3.02-3.20). HAPI patients had longer adjusted length of stay (3.7 days, P < .0001), higher total hospitalization cost ($8014, P < .0001), and greater odds of readmissions through 180 days (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.55-1.65). This study demonstrates how big data may help quantify HAPI burden and improve internal hospital processes by identifying high-risk patients and informing best practices for prevention.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Boyko

Roger Pecoraro made important contribution to diabetic foot research and is primarily responsible for instilling in me an interest in these complications. Our collaboration in the final years of his life led to the development of the Seattle Diabetic Foot Study. At the time it began, the Seattle Diabetic Foot Study was perhaps unique in being a prospective study of diabetic foot ulcer conducted in a non-specialty primary care population of patients with diabetes and without foot ulcer. Important findings from this research include the demonstration that neurovascular measurements, diabetes characteristics, past history of ulcer or amputation, body weight, and poor vision all significantly and independently predict foot ulcer risk. A prediction model from this research that included only readily available clinical information showed excellent ability to discriminate between patients who did and did not develop ulcer during follow-up (area under ROC curve=0.81 at one year). Identification of limb-specific amputation risk factors showed considerable overlap with those risk factors identified for foot ulcer, but suggested arterial perfusion as playing a more important role. Risk of foot ulcer in relation to peak plantar pressure estimated at the site of the pressure measurement showed a significant association over the metatarsal heads, but not other foot locations, suggesting that the association between pressure and this outcome may differ by foot location. The Seattle Diabetic Foot Study has helped to expand our knowledge base on risk factors and potential causes of foot complications. Translating this information into preventive interventions remains a continuing challenge.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Bocheng Peng ◽  
Rui Min ◽  
Yiqin Liao ◽  
Aixi Yu

Objective. To determine the novel proposed nomogram model accuracy in the prediction of the lower-extremity amputations (LEA) risk in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Methods and Materials. In this retrospective study, data of 125 patients with diabetic foot ulcer who met the research criteria in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2015 to December 2019 were collected by filling in the clinical investigation case report form. Firstly, univariate analysis was used to find the primary predictive factors of amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcer. Secondly, single factor and multiple factor logistic regression analysis were employed to screen the independent influencing factors of amputation introducing the primary predictive factors selected from the univariate analysis. Thirdly, the independent influencing factors were applied to build a prediction model of amputation risk in patients with diabetic foot ulcer by using R4.3; then, the nomogram was established according to the selected variables visually. Finally, the performance of the prediction model was evaluated and verified by receiver working characteristic (ROC) curve, corrected calibration curve, and clinical decision curve. Results. 7 primary predictive factors were selected by univariate analysis from 21 variables, including the course of diabetes, peripheral angiopathy of diabetic (PAD), glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), white blood cells (WBC), albumin (ALB), blood uric acid (BUA), and fibrinogen (FIB); single factor logistic regression analysis showed that albumin was a protective factor for amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcer, and the other six factors were risk factors. Multivariate logical regression analysis illustrated that only five factors (the course of diabetes, PAD, HbA1c, WBC, and FIB) were independent risk factors for amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcer. According to the area under curve (AUC) of ROC was 0.876 and corrected calibration curve of the nomogram displayed good fitting ability, the model established by these 5 independent risk factors exhibited good ability to predict the risk of amputation. The decision analysis curve (DCA) indicated that the nomogram model was more practical and accurate when the risk threshold was between 6% and 91%. Conclusion. Our novel proposed nomogram showed that the course of diabetes, PAD, HbA1c, WBC, and FIB are the independent risk factors of amputation in patients with DFU. This prediction model was well developed and behaved a great accurate value for LEA so as to provide a useful tool for screening LEA risk and preventing DFU from developing into amputation.


2000 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humayun K Chowdhury ◽  
Mazharul H Khan ◽  
Jawadur R Wadud

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 710-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hartemann-Heurtier ◽  
J. Robert ◽  
S. Jacqueminet ◽  
G. Ha Van ◽  
J. L. Golmard ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1039-1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila Yazdanpanah ◽  
Hajieh Shahbazian ◽  
Iraj Nazari ◽  
Saeed Hesam ◽  
Fatemeh Ahmadi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (23) ◽  
pp. 1611-1618
Author(s):  
Stephan Braune ◽  
Simone Gurlit

AbstractA delirium in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a manifestation of a severe acute dysfunction of the brain. It has a high prevalence and is associated with a relevant increase in morbidity and mortality. A cholinergic deficit and dopaminergic overactivity are considered to be a cause of delirium. Polypharmacy, which is often present before admission to the ICU, especially in the elderly, plays a key role as a trigger. The knowledge and identification of risk factors for delirium is a precondition for the early and effective prevention of delirium. The aim is the pre-operative or pre-interventional optimization of modifiable risk factors. Early and effective prevention of delirium can improve clinical outcome, reduce mortality, and positively impact long-term functional outcome. Non-pharmacological measures are always the basis for the prevention of delirium: maintenance of the day-night rhythm, sleep promotion at night and stimulation during the day, involvement of relatives, the avoidance of dehydration and malnutrition, and others more. They are pharmacologically accompanied by an effective analgesia and a target and symptom-oriented sedation with well controllable, as little as possible delirogenic substances. Interdisciplinary and interprofessional cooperation is essential so that preventive concepts significantly reduce the risk of delirium, even in high-risk patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila Yazdanpanah ◽  
Hajieh Shahbazian ◽  
Iraj Nazari ◽  
Hamid Reza Arti ◽  
Fatemeh Ahmadi ◽  
...  

Aim/Introduction. This study was carried out to assess the incidence and risk factors of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Materials and Methods. In this prospective cohort study in a university hospital, all the participants were examined and followed up for new DFU as final outcome for two years. To analyze the data, the variables were first evaluated with a univariate analysis. Then variables with P value < 0.2 were tested with a multivariate analysis, using backward-elimination multiple logistic regression. Results. Among 605 patients, 39 cases had DFU, so we followed up the remaining 566 patients without any present or history of DFU. A two-year cumulative incidence of diabetic foot ulcer was 5.62% (95% CI 3.89–8.02). After analysis, previous history of DFU or amputation [OR = 9.65, 95% CI (2.13–43.78), P value = 0.003], insulin usage [OR = 5.78, 95% CI (2.37–14.07), P value < 0.01], gender [OR = 3.23, 95% CI (1.33–7.83), P value = 0.01], distal neuropathy [OR = 3.37, 95% CI (1.40–8.09), P value = 0.007], and foot deformity [OR = 3.02, 95% CI (1.10–8.29), P value = 0.032] had a statistically significant relationship with DFU incidence. Conclusion. Our data showed that the average annual DFU incidence is about 2.8%. Independent risk factors of DFU development were previous history of DFU or amputation, insulin consumption, gender, distal neuropathy, and foot deformity. These findings provide support for a multifactorial etiology for DFU.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document