mouse lysozyme
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

15
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ueno ◽  
T. Ueda ◽  
K. Sakai ◽  
Y. Abe ◽  
N. Hamasaki ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 173 (3) ◽  
pp. 1763-1771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratima Sinha ◽  
Howard H. Chi ◽  
Hong R. Kim ◽  
Björn E. Clausen ◽  
Brian Pederson ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 380 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp MARKART ◽  
Nicole FAUST ◽  
Thomas GRAF ◽  
Cheng-Lun NA ◽  
Timothy E. WEAVER ◽  
...  

Lysozyme is one of the most abundant antimicrobial proteins in the airspaces of the lung. Mice express two lysozyme genes, lysozyme M and P, but only the M enzyme is detected in abundance in lung tissues. Disruption of the lysozyme M locus significantly increased bacterial burden and mortality following intratracheal infection with a Gram-negative bacterium. Unexpectedly, significant lysozyme enzyme activity (muramidase activity) was detected in the airspaces of uninfected lysozyme M−/− mice, amounting to 25% of the activity in wild-type mice. Muramidase activity in lysozyme M−/− mice was associated with increased lysozyme P mRNA and protein in lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid respectively. The muramidase activity of recombinant lysozyme P was less than that of recombinant M lysozyme. Recombinant P lysozyme was also less effective in killing selected Gram-negative bacteria, requiring higher concentrations than lysozyme M to achieve the same level of killing. The lower antimicrobial activity of P lysozyme, coupled with incomplete compensation by P lysozyme in lysozyme M−/− mice, probably accounts for the increased susceptibility of null mice to infection. Recombinant lysozyme M and P were equally effective in killing selected Gram-positive organisms. This outcome suggests that disruption of both M and P loci would significantly increase susceptibility to airway infections, particularly those associated with colonization by Gram-positive organisms.


2004 ◽  
Vol 169 (4) ◽  
pp. 454-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Markart ◽  
Thomas R. Korfhagen ◽  
Timothy E. Weaver ◽  
Henry T. Akinbi
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Obita ◽  
T. Ueda ◽  
T. Imoto

Immunology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Tsujihata ◽  
Yousuke Mizukami ◽  
Tadashi Ueda ◽  
Takanori So ◽  
Taiji Imoto

2000 ◽  
Vol 165 (7) ◽  
pp. 3606-3611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Tsujihata ◽  
Takanori So ◽  
Yuki Chijiiwa ◽  
Yoshio Hashimoto ◽  
Masato Hirata ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 183 (2) ◽  
pp. 535-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
K D Moudgil ◽  
I S Grewal ◽  
P E Jensen ◽  
E E Sercarz

A self-peptide containing amino acid residues 46-61 (NRGDQSTDYGIFQINSR) of mouse lysozyme (ML) (p46-61, which binds strongly to the A(k) molecule but does not bind to the E(k) molecule), can induce a strong proliferative T cell response in CBA/J mice (A[k], E[k]) but no response at all in B10.A(4R) and CBA/J mice. The critical residues within p46-59 are immunogenic in both B10.A(4R) and CBA/J mice. The critical residues within p46-61 reside between amino acid positions 51 and 59. T cells of B10.A(4R) mice primed with the truncated peptides in vivo cannot be restimulated by p46-61 in vitro. This suggests that T cell receptor (TCR) contact (epitopic) residue(s) flanking the minimal 51-59 determinant within p46-61 hinder the interaction of the p46-61/A(k) complex with the appropriate TCR(S), thereby causing a lack of proliferative T cell response in this mouse strain. Unlike B10.A(4R) mice, [B10.A(4R) x CBA/J]F1 mice responded vigorously to p46-61, suggesting that thymic APC of B10.A(4R) mice do not present a self ligand to T cells resulting in a p46-61-specific hole in the T cell repertoire in B10.A(4R) or the F1 mice. Moreover, APC from B10.A(4R) mice are capable of efficiently presenting p46-61 to peptide-specific T cell lines from CBA/J mice. The proliferative unresponsiveness of B10.A(4R) mice to p46-61 is not due to non-major histocompatibility complex genes because B10.A mice (A[k], E[k]) respond well to p46-61. Interestingly, B10.A(4R) mice can raise a good proliferative response to p46-61 (R61A) (in which the arginine residue at position 61 (R61L/F/N/K), indicating that R61 was indeed responsible for hindering the interaction of p46-61 with the appropriate TCR. Finally, chimeric mice [B10.A(4R)-->B10.A] responded vigorously to p46-61, suggesting that thymic antigen presentation environment of the B10.A mouse was critical for development of a p46-61-reactive T cell repertoire. Thus, we provide experimental demonstration of a novel mechanism for unresponsiveness to a self peptide, p46-61, in the B10.A(4R) mouse owing to hindrance: in this system it is the interaction between the available TCR and the A(k)/p46-61 complex, which is hindered by epitopic residue(s) within p46-61. We argue that besides possessing T cells that are hindered by R61 of p46-61, CBA/J and B10.A mice have developed an additional subset of T cells bearing TCRs which are not hinderable by R61, presumably through positive selection with peptides derived from class II E(k), or class I D(k)/D(d) molecules. These results have important implications in self tolerance, shaping of the T cell repertoire, and in defining susceptibility to autoimmunity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document