pneumatic vibrator
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 465-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Goossens ◽  
Lotte Janssens ◽  
Madelon Pijnenburg ◽  
Karen Caeyenberghs ◽  
Charlotte Van Rompuy ◽  
...  

Processing proprioceptive information in the brain is essential for optimal postural control and can be studied with proprioceptive stimulation, provided by muscle vibration, during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Classic electromagnetic muscle vibrators, however, cannot be used in the high-strength magnetic field of the fMRI scanner. Pneumatic vibrators offer an fMRI-compatible alternative. However, whether these devices produce reliable and valid proprioceptive stimuli has not been investigated, although this is essential for these devices to be used in longitudinal research. Test–retest reliability and concurrent validity of the postural response to muscle vibration, provided by custom-made fMRI-compatible pneumatic vibrators, were assessed in a repeated-measures design. Mean center of pressure (CoP) displacements during, respectively, ankle muscle and back muscle vibration (45–60 Hz, 0.5 mm) provided by an electromagnetic and a pneumatic vibrator were measured in ten young healthy subjects. The test was repeated on the same day and again within one week. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess (a) intra- and interday reliability of the postural responses to, respectively, pneumatic and electromagnetic vibration, and (b) concurrent validity of the response to pneumatic compared to electromagnetic vibration. Test–retest reliability of mean CoP displacements during pneumatic vibration was good to excellent (ICCs = 0.64–0.90) and resembled that of responses to electromagnetic vibration (ICCs = 0.64–0.94). Concurrent validity of the postural effect of pneumatic vibration was good to excellent (ICCs = 0.63–0.95). In conclusion, the proposed fMRI-compatible pneumatic vibrator can be used with confidence to stimulate muscle spindles during fMRI to study central processing of proprioception.


Author(s):  
Joseph Soltys ◽  
Sara Wilson

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) promises to grant motor control researchers opportunities to more directly explore neuromotor system dynamics including the role of proprioception. The effects of vibration on proprioception have been well documented including changes in perceived muscle length and lengthening velocity and altered muscle spindle organ firing [1–4]. As such, the combination of vibration of the muscle-tendon with fMRI of the brain can be used to better understand how proprioceptive signals are managed in the brain. However, the strength of the magnetic environment of the fMRI does not easily allow for traditional vibration technologies, such as a DC motor with offset mass, to be used to create the necessary vibratory stimulus to perturb the proprioceptive system. Several researchers have nonetheless successfully designed and implemented various vibration devices to probe the brain in the fMRI environment [5–7].


Author(s):  
Hyun Dong Kim ◽  
Kyung Chun Kim

This paper presents a micro-PIV measurement for investigation of flow characteristics in a micro chamber for trapping of a live cell. The micro cell chip consisting of pneumatic vibrator arrays and a trap chamber was fabricated through a replica molding technology with a SU-8 mold and Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) polymer. The single cell in the trap chamber was manipulated and trapped in the equilibrium region by exploiting the geometrical symmetry of the vibrators. The x-axial velocity of the viscous fluid induced by the deformation of the flexible diaphragms was eliminated or minimized at the center of vibrators. From the measurement results, the proper operational conditions of the vibrators were determined and it is also verified that the particle can be actively manipulated and trapped as desired.


2002 ◽  
Vol 324 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan M. Golaszewski ◽  
Fritz Zschiegner ◽  
Christian M. Siedentopf ◽  
Josef Unterrainer ◽  
Reinhart A. Sweeney ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 66 (652) ◽  
pp. 3842-3848
Author(s):  
Toshinori FUJITA ◽  
Yasutoki MANDA ◽  
Yasuhiko HARA ◽  
Toshiharu KAGAWA

1979 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-419
Author(s):  
N. G. Nazarov ◽  
A. Ya. Tishkov ◽  
Z. S. Yamshchikova

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document