interior spruce
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

111
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Frances Ackerman ◽  
David Goldblum

Climate change may have spatially variable impacts on growth of trees in topographically diverse environments, making generalizing across broad spatial and temporal extents inappropriate. Therefore, topography must be considered when analyzing growth response to climate. We address these topo-climatic relationships in the Canadian Rocky Mountains, focusing on lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Douglas ex Louden) and interior spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss × Picea engelmannii hybrid Parry) growth response to climate, Palmer drought severity index (PDSI), aspect, and slope angle. Climate variables correlate with older lodgepole pine growth on south- and west-facing slopes, including previous August temperature, winter and spring precipitation, and previous late-summer and current spring PDSI, but younger lodgepole pine were generally less sensitive to climate. Climate variables correlate with interior spruce growth on all slope aspects, with winter temperature and PDSI important for young and old individuals. Numerous monthly growth–climate correlations are not temporally stable, with shifts over the past century, and response differs by slope aspect and angle. Both species are likely to be negatively affected by moisture stress in the future in some, but not all, topographic environments. Results suggest species-specific and site-specific spatiotemporally diverse climate–growth responses, indicating that climate change is likely to have spatially variable impacts on radial growth response in mountainous environments.


Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Stella Britwum Acquah ◽  
Peter L. Marshall

Research Highlights: We investigated the competitive interactions among three tree species (interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Beissn.) Franco), interior spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss × Picea engelmannii Engelm.), and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. Ex Loud. var. latifolia Englem.)) in multi-aged stands in central British Columbia, Canada. Background and Objectives: Understanding competitive interactions among tree species in mixed-species stands is fundamental to supporting silvicultural decision-making in such stands. Using the periodic annual basal area increment for single trees as our dependent variable, we investigated whether neighboring trees competed with subject trees independently of species identity. We also examined the differences in single-tree basal area growth among the three conifer species over time under different levels of competition. Materials and Methods: We developed several spatially explicit, single-tree basal area growth models for interior Douglas-fir, interior spruce, and lodgepole pine using data from 16 plots in two blocks of a long-term study (five measurements over a 21-year period) on the response to pre-commercial thinning. We compared these equations to assess whether intraspecific or interspecific competition predominated. We also examined the differences in basal area growth among the three conifer species over time under different levels of competition. Results: We found asymmetrical relationships between the conifer trees and their neighbors for all species, indicating that the main driver limiting growth in these stands is aboveground competition for light. There was evidence of higher intraspecific competition for small (<10.0 cm DBH) interior Douglas-fir in one block. However, there was no general pattern among larger subject trees with respect to the identity of neighborhood competitive effects and the equivalence of neighbors. We observed a higher level of basal area growth over time for interior Douglas-fir than for lodgepole pine and interior spruce, irrespective of the competition intensity and, not surprisingly, the growth rate declined with increasing competition levels for the three species. Conclusions: Our results provide an understanding of how interior Douglas-fir stands will develop over time and information on species interactions that could help forest managers explore different silvicultural options and their effects on individual tree growth in these complex stands.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omnia Gamal El-Dien ◽  
Blaise Ratcliffe ◽  
Jaroslav Klápště ◽  
Ilga Porth ◽  
Charles Chen ◽  
...  

BMC Genomics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina L. Conte ◽  
Kathryn A. Hodgins ◽  
Sam Yeaman ◽  
Jon C. Degner ◽  
Sally N. Aitken ◽  
...  

Holzforschung ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn D. Mansfield ◽  
Roberta Parish ◽  
Peter K. Ott ◽  
James F. Hart ◽  
James W. Goudie

Abstract A dynamic interrelationship exists among wood density and fiber traits (tracheid length and microfibril angel, MFA) and the ultimate wood strength properties. Moreover, many of the basic fundamental wood attributes are heavily influenced by crown size and architecture. In an attempt to examine this interplay, we thoroughly characterized 60 interior spruce (Picea glauca × P. engelmannii) trees sampled in three age classes from four sites in central British Columbia. Breast height discs were taken, and relative wood density was measured along two radii. Tracheid length was assessed on isolated 5 years increments from pith to bark at breast height for each tree, as was MFA. Segmented regression was used to identify the “juvenile to mature wood” transition point, which revealed transition ages of 9.4 and 15.1 years for wood density and MFA, respectively, while fiber length continued to elongate until near 60 years of age. The flexural properties, modulus of elasticity (MoE) and modulus of rupture (MoR), were also quantified in the 60 individuals and found to be best predicted by VFV, a measure of tree vigor, and not the basic wood attributes. These findings imply that long crowns carrying large amounts of foliage, VFV, negatively impact wood strength in interior spruce.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina J. Liepe ◽  
Andreas Hamann ◽  
Pia Smets ◽  
Connor R. Fitzpatrick ◽  
Sally N. Aitken

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 505-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kostantinos Demertzis ◽  
Lazaros Iliadis ◽  
Stavros Avramidis ◽  
Yousry A. El-Kassaby

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document