composite anodes
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

412
(FIVE YEARS 140)

H-INDEX

48
(FIVE YEARS 12)

Carbon ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 188 ◽  
pp. 546
Author(s):  
Xiao-long REN ◽  
De-sheng AI ◽  
Rui-tao LU ◽  
Fei-yu KANG ◽  
Zheng-hong HUANG
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1103-1108
Author(s):  
Xiao-long Ren ◽  
De-sheng Ai ◽  
Rui-tao Lv ◽  
Fei-yu Kang ◽  
Zheng-Hong Huang
Keyword(s):  

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (22) ◽  
pp. 7099
Author(s):  
Evgeniya Il’ina ◽  
Svetlana Pershina ◽  
Boris Antonov ◽  
Alexander Pankratov

All-solid-state lithium-ion batteries raise the issue of high resistance at the interface between solid electrolyte and electrode materials that needs to be addressed. The article investigates the effect of a low-melting Li3BO3 additive introduced into LiCoO2- and Li4Ti5O12-based composite electrodes on the interface resistance with a Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte. According to DSC analysis, interaction in the studied mixtures with Li3BO3 begins at 768 and 725 °C for LiCoO2 and Li4Ti5O12, respectively. The resistance of half-cells with different contents of Li3BO3 additive after heating at 700 and 720 °C was studied by impedance spectroscopy in the temperature range of 25–340 °C. It was established that the introduction of 5 wt% Li3BO3 into LiCoO2 and heat treatment at 720 °C led to the greatest decrease in the interface resistance from 260 to 40 Ω cm2 at 300 °C in comparison with pure LiCoO2. An SEM study demonstrated that the addition of the low-melting component to electrode mass gave better contact with ceramics. It was shown that an increase in the annealing temperature of unmodified cells with Li4Ti5O12 led to a decrease in the interface resistance. It was found that the interface resistance between composite anodes and solid electrolyte had lower values compared to Li4Ti5O12|Li7La3Zr2O12 half-cells. It was established that the resistance of cells with the Li4Ti5O12/Li3BO3 composite anode annealed at 720 °C decreased from 97.2 (x = 0) to 7.0 kΩ cm2 (x = 5 wt% Li3BO3) at 150 °C.


2021 ◽  
Vol 395 ◽  
pp. 139104
Author(s):  
Giovanna Maresca ◽  
Akiko Tsurumaki ◽  
Naoki Suzuki ◽  
Koji Yoshida ◽  
Stefania Panero ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
TIANYANG ZHOU ◽  
JAMES G. BOYD ◽  
DIMITRIS C. LAGOUDAS

A multifunctional efficiency metric is developed using mean-field micromechanics solutions to quantify the multifunctionality of the multifunctional composite anodes. Multifunctional efficiency metrics evaluate the volume and/or mass savings or performance increase when structural and functional materials are replaced by multifunctional materials [1]. The proposed methodology compares the total energy associated with different functionalities, such as elastic strain energy and electric charge energy of the multifunctional materials with the total energy of the single function structural and functional material. To achieve volume and mass savings, the energy of different functionalities is set to be the same between the multifunctional and traditional single- functional materials, and, at the same time, the volume and/or mass of the multifunctional composite needs to be smaller than that of the combination of single- functional materials. The volumes and/or mass savings can be expressed using the properties of multifunctional and traditional single-functional materials. In this work, structural anodes made from silicon nanoparticles, reduced graphene oxide, and aramid nanofibers are used as an example to calculate the mass savings compared to a traditional anode with structural support. The existing multifunctionality metrics are based on the rule of mixtures method, which is adequate for certain geometries and loading conditions, such as in-plane directions for laminate composites. However, if multifunctional composite materials involve multiple phases, material property variation during the charging process, and complex geometries or orientations of the structural and functional phases, a more comprehensive method is required to accurately capture the multifunctional efficiency. The multifunctional efficiency varies significantly during the charging and discharging process. This new metric can provide both upper and lower bounds of multifunctional efficiency. This new multifunctional efficiency metric will help optimize the selection and arrangement of different phases in the multifunctional and quantify the optimization results.


Author(s):  
Gyujin Song ◽  
Myung-Jun Kwak ◽  
Chihyun Hwang ◽  
Cheolwon An ◽  
Suhee Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document