Locus-specific induction of gene expression from heterochromatin loci during cellular senescence

Cellular senescence is a fate-determined state, accompanied by reorganization of heterochromatin. While lineage-appropriate genes can be temporarily repressed through facultative heterochromatin, stable silencing of lineage-inappropriate genes often involves the constitutive heterochromatic mark, histone H3K9me3. The fate of these heterochromatic genes during the chromatin reorganization accompanying senescence is unclear. Here we show a small number of lineage-inappropriate genes are derepressed in senescent cells from H3K9me3 regions that gain open chromatin marks. DNA FISH experiments reveal that these gene loci, which are tightly condensed at the nuclear periphery in proliferative cells, are physically decompacted during senescence. Among these gene loci, NLRP3 is predominantly expressed in immune cells, such as macrophages, where it resides within an open topologically associated domain (TAD). In contrast, NLRP3 is derepressed in senescent fibroblasts, potentially due to the local disruption of the H3K9me3-rich TAD that contains it. The role of NLRP3 has been implicated in the amplification of inflammatory cytokine signalling in senescence and aging, underscoring the functional relevance of gene induction from ‘permissive’ H3K9me3 regions in senescent cells.

Interplay of pericentromeric genome organization and chromatin landscape regulates the expression of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatic genes

Background Transcription of genes residing within constitutive heterochromatin is paradoxical to the tenets of epigenetic code. The regulatory mechanisms of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatic gene transcription remain largely unknown. Emerging evidence suggests that genome organization and transcriptional regulation are inter-linked. However, the pericentromeric genome organization is relatively less studied. Therefore, we sought to characterize the pericentromeric genome organization and understand how this organization along with the pericentromeric factors influences heterochromatic gene expression. Results Here, we characterized the pericentromeric genome organization in Drosophila melanogaster using 5C sequencing. Heterochromatic topologically associating domains (Het TADs) correlate with distinct epigenomic domains of active and repressed heterochromatic genes at the pericentromeres. These genes are known to depend on the heterochromatic landscape for their expression. However, HP1a or Su(var)3-9 RNAi has minimal effects on heterochromatic gene expression, despite causing significant changes in the global Het TAD organization. Probing further into this observation, we report the role of two other chromatin proteins enriched at the pericentromeres-dMES-4 and dADD1 in regulating the expression of a subset of heterochromatic genes. Conclusions Distinct pericentromeric genome organization and chromatin landscapes maintained by the interplay of heterochromatic factors (HP1a, H3K9me3, dMES-4 and dADD1) are sufficient to support heterochromatic gene expression despite the loss of global Het TAD structure. These findings open new avenues for future investigations into the mechanisms of heterochromatic gene expression.

Rrp6 Regulates Heterochromatic Gene Silencing via ncRNA RUF6 Decay in Malaria Parasites

ABSTRACT The heterochromatin environment plays a central role in silencing genes associated with the malaria parasite’s development, survival in the host, and transmission to the mosquito vector. However, the underlying mechanism regulating the dynamic chromatin structure is not understood yet. Here, we have uncovered that Plasmodium falciparum Rrp6, an orthologue of eukaryotic RNA exosome-associated RNase, controls the silencing of heterochromatic genes. PfRrp6 knockdown disrupted the singular expression of the GC-rich ncRNA RUF6 family, a known critical regulator of virulence gene expression, through the stabilization of the nascent transcripts. Mechanistic investigation showed that the accumulation of the multiple RUF6 ncRNAs triggered local chromatin remodeling in situ, which activated their adjacent var genes. Strikingly, chromatin isolation by RNA purification analysis (ChIRP-seq) revealed that a remarkable RUF6 ncRNA had interacted with distal heterochromatin regions directly and stimulated a global derepression effect on heterochromatic genes, including all variant gene families and the sexual commitment-associated regulator ap2-g gene. Collectively, Rrp6 appears to conduct the epigenetic surveillance of heterochromatic gene expression through controlling RUF6 levels, thereby securing antigenic variation and sexual commitment of malaria parasites during the infection of the host. IMPORTANCE Malaria remains a major public health and economic burden. The heterochromatin environment controls the silencing of genes associated with the fate of malaria parasites. Previous studies have demonstrated that a group of GC-rich ncRNAs (RUF6) is associated with the mutually exclusive expression of var genes, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Here, through a series of genetic manipulation and genome-wide multiomics analysis, we have identified the plasmodial orthologue of RNA exosome-associated Rrp6 as an upstream regulator of RUF6 expression and revealed that the dysregulation of RUF6 upon Rrp6 knockdown triggered local chromatin alteration, thereby activating most heterochromatic genes via direct interaction of RUF6 and distal gene loci. This finding not only uncovered the in-depth mechanism of RUF6-mediated regulation of heterochromatic genes but also identified Rrp6 as a novel regulator of gene expression in human malaria parasites, which provides a new target for developing intervention strategies against malaria.

Insulator proteins contribute to expression of gene loci repositioned into heterochromatin in the course of Drosophila evolution

Pericentric heterochromatin in Drosophila is generally composed of repetitive DNA forming a transcriptionally repressive environment. Nevertheless, dozens of genes were embedded into pericentric genome regions during evolution of Drosophilidae lineage and retained functional activity. However, factors that contribute to “immunity” of these gene loci to transcriptional silencing remain unknown. Here, we investigated molecular evolution of the essential Myb and Ranbp16 genes. These protein-coding genes reside in euchromatic loci of chromosome X in D. melanogaster and related species, while in other studied Drosophila species, including evolutionary distant ones, they are located in genomic regions highly enriched with the remnants of transposable elements (TEs), suggesting their heterochromatic nature and location. The promoter region of Myb exhibits a conserved structure throughout the Drosophila phylogeny and carries motifs for binding of chromatin remodeling factors, including insulator BEAF-32, regardless of eu- or heterochromatic surroundings. Importantly, BEAF-32 occupies not only the promoter region of Myb but is also found in the vicinity of transcriptional start sites (TSS) of Ranbp16 gene as well as in a wide range of genes located in the contrasting chromatin types in D. melanogaster and D. virilis, denoting the boundary of the nucleosome-free region available for RNA polymerase II recruitment and the surrounding heterochromatin. We also find that along with BEAF-32, insulators dCTCF and GAF are enriched at the TSS of heterochromatic genes in D. melanogaster. Thus, we propose that insulator proteins contribute to gene expression in the heterochromatic environment and, hence, facilitate the evolutionary repositioning of gene loci into heterochromatin.Author summaryHeterochromatin in Drosophila is generally associated with transcriptional silencing. Nevertheless, hundreds of essential genes have been identified in the pericentric heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Interestingly, genes embedded in pericentric heterochromatin of D. melanogaster may occupy different genomic loci, euchromatic or heterochromatic, due to repositioning in the course of evolution of Drosophila species. By surveying factors that contribute to the normal functioning of the relocated genes in distant Drosophila species, i.e. D. melanogaster and D. virilis, we identify certain insulator proteins (e.g.BEAF-32) that facilitate the expression of heterochromatic genes in spite of the repressive environment.

Interplay of pericentromeric genome organization and chromatin landscape regulates the expression of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatic genes

Transcription of heterochromatic genes residing within the constitutive heterochromatin is paradoxical to the tenets of the epigenetic code. Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatic genes serve as an excellent model system to understand the mechanisms of their transcriptional regulation. Recent developments in chromatin conformation techniques have revealed that genome organization regulates the transcriptional outputs. Thus, using 5C-seq in S2 cells, we present a detailed characterization of the hierarchical genome organization of Drosophila pericentromeric heterochromatin and its contribution to heterochromatic gene expression. We show that pericentromeric TAD borders are enriched in nuclear Matrix attachment regions while the intra-TAD interactions are mediated by various insulator binding proteins. Heterochromatic genes of similar expression levels cluster into Het TADs which indicates their transcriptional co-regulation. To elucidate how heterochromatic factors, influence the expression of heterochromatic genes, we performed 5C-seq in the HP1a or Su(var)3-9 depleted cells. HP1a or Su(var)3-9 RNAi results in perturbation of global pericentromeric TAD organization but the expression of the heterochromatic genes is minimally affected. Subset of active heterochromatic genes have been shown to have combination of HP1a/H3K9me3 with H3K36me3 at their exons. Interestingly, the knock-down of dMES-4 (H3K36 methyltransferase), downregulates expression of the heterochromatic genes. This indicates that the local chromatin interactions and the combination of heterochromatic factors (HP1a or H3K9me3) along with the H3K36me3 is crucial to drive the expression of heterochromatic genes. Furthermore, dADD1, present near the TSS of the active heterochromatic genes, can bind to both H3K9me3 or HP1a and facilitate the heterochromatic gene expression by regulating the H3K36me3 levels. Therefore, our findings provide mechanistic insights into the interplay of genome organization and chromatin factors at the pericentromeric heterochromatin that regulates Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatic gene expression.

Epigenomic and genomic landscape of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatic genes

Heterochromatin is associated with transcriptional repression. In contrast, several genes in the pericentromeric regions of Drosophila melanogaster are dependent on this heterochromatic environment for their expression. Heterochromatic genes encode proteins involved in various developmental processes. Several studies have shown that a variety of epigenetic modifications is associated with these genes. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of the epigenetic landscape of heterochromatic genes across all the developmental stages of Drosophila using the available histone modification and expression data from modENCODE. We find that heterochromatic genes exhibit combinations of active and inactive histone marks that correspond to their level of expression during development. Thus, we classified these genes into three groups based on the combinations of histone modifications present. We also looked for potential regulatory DNA sequence elements in the genomic neighborhood of these genes. Our results show that Nuclear Matrix Associated Regions (MARs) are prominently present in the intergenic regions of heterochromatic genes during embryonic stages suggesting their plausible role in pericentromeric genome organization. We also find that the intergenic sequences in the heterochromatic regions have binding sites for transcription factors known to modulate epigenetic status. Taken together, our meta-analysis of the various genomic datasets suggest that the epigenomic and genomic landscape of the heterochromatic genes are distinct from that of euchromatic genes. These features could be contributing to the unusual regulatory status of the heterochromatic genes as opposed to the surrounding heterochromatin, which is repressive in nature.