scholarly journals Interplay of pericentromeric genome organization and chromatin landscape regulates the expression of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatic genes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parna Saha ◽  
Divya Tej Sowpati ◽  
Ishanee Srivastava ◽  
Rakesh Kumar Mishra

AbstractTranscription of heterochromatic genes residing within the constitutive heterochromatin is paradoxical to the tenets of the epigenetic code. Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatic genes serve as an excellent model system to understand the mechanisms of their transcriptional regulation. Recent developments in chromatin conformation techniques have revealed that genome organization regulates the transcriptional outputs. Thus, using 5C-seq in S2 cells, we present a detailed characterization of the hierarchical genome organization of Drosophila pericentromeric heterochromatin and its contribution to heterochromatic gene expression. We show that pericentromeric TAD borders are enriched in nuclear Matrix attachment regions while the intra-TAD interactions are mediated by various insulator binding proteins. Heterochromatic genes of similar expression levels cluster into Het TADs which indicates their transcriptional co-regulation. To elucidate how heterochromatic factors, influence the expression of heterochromatic genes, we performed 5C-seq in the HP1a or Su(var)3-9 depleted cells. HP1a or Su(var)3-9 RNAi results in perturbation of global pericentromeric TAD organization but the expression of the heterochromatic genes is minimally affected. Subset of active heterochromatic genes have been shown to have combination of HP1a/H3K9me3 with H3K36me3 at their exons. Interestingly, the knock-down of dMES-4 (H3K36 methyltransferase), downregulates expression of the heterochromatic genes. This indicates that the local chromatin interactions and the combination of heterochromatic factors (HP1a or H3K9me3) along with the H3K36me3 is crucial to drive the expression of heterochromatic genes. Furthermore, dADD1, present near the TSS of the active heterochromatic genes, can bind to both H3K9me3 or HP1a and facilitate the heterochromatic gene expression by regulating the H3K36me3 levels. Therefore, our findings provide mechanistic insights into the interplay of genome organization and chromatin factors at the pericentromeric heterochromatin that regulates Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatic gene expression.

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parna Saha ◽  
Divya Tej Sowpati ◽  
Mamilla Soujanya ◽  
Ishanee Srivastava ◽  
Rakesh Kumar Mishra

Abstract Background Transcription of genes residing within constitutive heterochromatin is paradoxical to the tenets of epigenetic code. The regulatory mechanisms of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatic gene transcription remain largely unknown. Emerging evidence suggests that genome organization and transcriptional regulation are inter-linked. However, the pericentromeric genome organization is relatively less studied. Therefore, we sought to characterize the pericentromeric genome organization and understand how this organization along with the pericentromeric factors influences heterochromatic gene expression. Results Here, we characterized the pericentromeric genome organization in Drosophila melanogaster using 5C sequencing. Heterochromatic topologically associating domains (Het TADs) correlate with distinct epigenomic domains of active and repressed heterochromatic genes at the pericentromeres. These genes are known to depend on the heterochromatic landscape for their expression. However, HP1a or Su(var)3-9 RNAi has minimal effects on heterochromatic gene expression, despite causing significant changes in the global Het TAD organization. Probing further into this observation, we report the role of two other chromatin proteins enriched at the pericentromeres-dMES-4 and dADD1 in regulating the expression of a subset of heterochromatic genes. Conclusions Distinct pericentromeric genome organization and chromatin landscapes maintained by the interplay of heterochromatic factors (HP1a, H3K9me3, dMES-4 and dADD1) are sufficient to support heterochromatic gene expression despite the loss of global Het TAD structure. These findings open new avenues for future investigations into the mechanisms of heterochromatic gene expression.


genesis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. e23222
Author(s):  
Jorge Victor Wilfredo Cachay Wester ◽  
Carlos Antonio Couto Lima ◽  
Maiaro Cabral Rosa Machado ◽  
Patrícia Vieira Zampar ◽  
Simone Sakagute Tavares ◽  
...  

Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annick Lesne ◽  
Marie-Odile Baudement ◽  
Cosette Rebouissou ◽  
Thierry Forné

The importance of genome organization at the supranucleosomal scale in the control of gene expression is increasingly recognized today. In mammals, Topologically Associating Domains (TADs) and the active/inactive chromosomal compartments are two of the main nuclear structures that contribute to this organization level. However, recent works reviewed here indicate that, at specific loci, chromatin interactions with nuclear bodies could also be crucial to regulate genome functions, in particular transcription. They moreover suggest that these nuclear bodies are membrane-less organelles dynamically self-assembled and disassembled through mechanisms of phase separation. We have recently developed a novel genome-wide experimental method, High-salt Recovered Sequences sequencing (HRS-seq), which allows the identification of chromatin regions associated with large ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes and nuclear bodies. We argue that the physical nature of such RNP complexes and nuclear bodies appears to be central in their ability to promote efficient interactions between distant genomic regions. The development of novel experimental approaches, including our HRS-seq method, is opening new avenues to understand how self-assembly of phase-separated nuclear bodies possibly contributes to mammalian genome organization and gene expression.


Genetics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 183 (3) ◽  
pp. 1005-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Cruz ◽  
Alvaro Glavic ◽  
Mar Casado ◽  
Jose F. de Celis

The Drosophila melanogaster wing is a model system for analyzing the genetic control of organ size, shape, and pattern formation. The formation of the wing involves a variety of processes, such as cell growth, proliferation, pattern formation, and differentiation. These developmental processes are under genetic control, and many genes participating in specific aspects of wing development have already being characterized. In this work, we aim to identify novel genes regulating wing growth and patterning. To this end, we have carried out a gain-of-function screen generating novel P-UAS (upstream activating sequences) insertions allowing forced gene expression. We produced 3340 novel P-UAS insertions and isolated 300 that cause a variety of wing phenotypes in combination with a Gal4 driver expressed exclusively in the central domain of the presumptive wing blade. The mapping of these P-UAS insertion sites allowed us to identify the gene that causes the gain-of-function phenotypes. We show that a fraction of these phenotypes are related to the induction of cell death in the domain of ectopic gene expression. Finally, we present a preliminary characterization of a gene identified in the screen, the function of which is required for the development of the L5 longitudinal vein.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo D’Oliveira Albanus ◽  
Yasuhiro Kyono ◽  
John Hensley ◽  
Arushi Varshney ◽  
Peter Orchard ◽  
...  

AbstractInteractions between transcription factors and chromatin are fundamental to genome organization and regulation and, ultimately, cell state. Here, we use information theory to measure signatures of organized chromatin resulting from transcription factor-chromatin interactions encoded in the patterns of the accessible genome, which we term chromatin information enrichment (CIE). We calculate CIE for hundreds of transcription factor motifs across human samples and identify two classes: low and high CIE. The 10–20% of common and tissue-specific high CIE transcription factor motifs, associate with higher protein–DNA residence time, including different binding site subclasses of the same transcription factor, increased nucleosome phasing, specific protein domains, and the genetic control of both chromatin accessibility and gene expression. These results show that variations in the information encoded in chromatin architecture reflect functional biological variation, with implications for cell state dynamics and memory.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan J Matthews ◽  
David J Waxman

Abstract Several thousand sex-differential distal enhancers have been identified in mouse liver; however, their links to sex-biased genes and the impact of any sex-differences in nuclear organization and chromatin interactions are unknown. To address these issues, we first characterized 1,847 mouse liver genomic regions showing significant sex differential occupancy by cohesin and CTCF, two key 3D nuclear organizing factors. These sex-differential binding sites were primarily distal to sex-biased genes but rarely generated sex-differential TAD (topologically associating domain) or intra-TAD loop anchors, and were sometimes found in TADs without sex-biased genes. A substantial subset of sex-biased cohesin-non-CTCF binding sites, but not sex-biased cohesin-and-CTCF binding sites, overlapped sex-biased enhancers. Cohesin depletion reduced the expression of male-biased genes with distal, but not proximal, sex-biased enhancers by >10-fold, implicating cohesin in long-range enhancer interactions regulating sex-biased genes. Using circularized chromosome conformation capture-based sequencing (4C-seq), we showed that sex differences in distal sex-biased enhancer - promoter interactions are common. Intra-TAD loops with sex-independent cohesin-and-CTCF anchors conferred sex specificity to chromatin interactions indirectly, by insulating sex-biased enhancer - promoter contacts and by bringing sex-biased genes into closer proximity to sex-biased enhancers. Furthermore, sex-differential chromatin interactions involving sex-biased gene promoters, enhancers, and lncRNAs were associated with sex-biased binding of cohesin and/or CTCF. These studies elucidate how 3D genome organization impacts sex-biased gene expression in a non-reproductive tissue through both direct and indirect effects of cohesin and CTCF looping on distal enhancer interactions with sex-differentially expressed genes.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan J Matthews ◽  
David J Waxman

Abstract Background: Sex differences in the transcriptome and epigenome are widespread in mouse liver and are associated with sex-bias in liver disease. Several thousand sex-differential distal enhancers have been identified; however, their links to sex-biased genes and the impact of any sex-differences in nuclear organization, DNA looping, and chromatin interactions are unknown.Results: To address these issues, we first characterized 1,847 mouse liver genomic regions showing significant sex differential occupancy by cohesin and CTCF, two key 3D nuclear organizing factors. These sex-differential binding sites were largely distal to sex-biased genes, but rarely generated sex-differential TAD (topologically associating domain) or intra-TAD loop anchors. A substantial subset of the sex-biased cohesin-non-CTCF binding sites, but not the sex-biased cohesin-and-CTCF binding sites, overlapped sex-biased enhancers. Cohesin depletion reduced the expression of male-biased genes with distal, but not proximal, sex-biased enhancers by >10-fold, implicating cohesin in long-range enhancer interactions regulating sex-biased genes. Using circularized chromosome conformation capture-based sequencing (4C-seq), we showed that sex differences in distal sex-biased enhancer-promoter interactions are common. Sex-differential chromatin interactions involving sex-biased gene promoters, enhancers, and lncRNAs were associated with sex-biased binding of cohesin and/or CTCF. Furthermore, intra-TAD loops with sex-independent cohesin-and-CTCF anchors conferred sex specificity to chromatin interactions indirectly, by insulating sex-biased enhancer-promoter contacts and by bringing sex-biased genes into closer proximity to sex-biased enhancers.Conclusions: These findings elucidate how 3-dimensional genome organization contributes to sex differences in gene expression in a non-reproductive tissue through both direct and indirect effects of cohesin and CTCF looping on distal enhancer interactions with sex-differentially expressed genes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document