A long-term response to allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation from haploidentical donor and post-transplant therapy in an adolescent with primary resistant neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most frequent pediatric extracranial solid tumor characterized by extreme biological heterogeneity with variable clinical course. Older age is an important risk factor. These patients may lack other common risk features but still have a chemoresistant disease with dismal prognosis. As there is currently no consensus on optimal treatment for patients with primary resistant NB, a number of clinical options is being explored including immunotherapy-based approaches. Immunotherapy with dinutuximab beta (DB) have proven its effectiveness as maintenance therapy. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation from haploidentical donor (haplo-HSCT) may be an effective consolidation in some cases. However, all forms of immunotherapy are much less effective in patients with large residual tumor. While there is no data on immune checkpoints inhibitors effectiveness in NB, some patients may benefit from this option as a part of complex immunotherapy strategy. Case presentation A 12-year old girl with gross paravertebral thoracic and abdominal tumor was diagnosed with undifferentiated neuroblastoma and bone metastases. While there was no response to several lines of chemotherapy, and only partial tumor resection was possible, the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from haploidentical donor (haplo-HSCT) was performed as salvage therapy. Since there was only minor decrease in tumor volume with good dynamics by MIBG scan, additional post-transplant therapy was initiated. External beam radiotherapy was given for local control. The patient also received combined immunotherapy with DB and nivolumab. Currently, 3.5 years post haplo-HSCT, despite still gross residual tumor mass, it is MIBG-negative and shows signs of differentiation. Conclusion The combination of haplo-HSCT with post-transplant anti-GD2 and nivolumab may lead to a long-term response in an adolescent with primary resistant NB in spite of a large residual tumor mass.

NOGGO Ov-42/MAMOC: Rucaparib maintenance after bevacizumab maintenance following carboplatin-based first line-chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients.

TPS6102 Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is associated with the highest mortality rates among gynecological malignancies, with most patients being diagnosed in advanced stages. The most common histological subtype is high grade serous OC, which is characterized by deficiency in homologous recombination. Debulking surgery, followed by platinum based chemotherapy and bevacizumab (bev), followed by maintenance therapy with bev, is the standard therapy for advanced BRCA wild type (BRCAwt) OC patients in Germany. BRCA mutant patients will receive maintenance with olaparib, according to SOLO1 data. The anticancer effects of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) seem to be increased by the addition of antiangiogenic drugs. Preclinical data showed increased HRD in tumors pretreated with bev, and clinical trials showed a benefit of the combination of antiangiogenic drugs and PARPi vs. PARPi alone. NOGGO Ov-42/MAMOC trial (NCT04227522) is a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating rucaparib maintenance following bevacizumab maintenance for the treatment of advanced primary high grade BRCAwt OC. Methods: 190 patients with histologically confirmed advanced (FIGO stage IIIA- IV of the 2014 FIGO classification) high grade serous or high grade endometrioid (based on local histopathological findings) OC, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cancer or clear cell carcinoma of the ovary will be randomized 2:1 to receive either rucaparib 600mg BID or placebo as maintenance therapy following first line chemotherapy with 6 cycles of Carboplatin/Paclitaxel and at least 12 cycles of bev, given together with chemotherapy and as maintenance. Only BRCAwt patients will be included in the trial. Randomization is stratified by surgery planned timepoint (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant), surgical outcome (no residual tumor mass vs. residual tumor mass), response to chemotherapy followed by bev (CR/NED vs. PR/SD) and study center. Treatment will continue for 24 months or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary endpoint is PFS in BRCAwt patients per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints are PFS2, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30/OV28, FSI, SF-12, PROC-CTCAE, every day memory questionnaire), daily activity, time to next medical intervention, time to next subsequent therapy, safety assessments and OS. Clinical trial information: NCT04227522.

Bone marrow MRI after autologous transplantation and the effect of residual tumor on progression-free survival of multiple myeloma patients

Background . The study of influence of residual tumor mass, determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), on the progression-free survival (PFS) remains an actual problem. Since the visual assessment of tumor bone marrow lesion can be one of the criteria for the subsequent personalized treatment choice in multiple myeloma patients.The objective of study was to determine the effect of bone marrow lesions detected by MRI after autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (auto-HSCT) on PFS in multiple myeloma patients.Materials and methods . The prospective study included 60 patients who underwent spine and pelvic bones MRI on the 100 th day after autoHSCT.Results . Focal bone marrow changes were found in 47 of them – from 1 to 56 lesions (mean 6 ± 9). Significant (p = 0.01) differences of PFS in multiple myeloma patients depending on the presence or absence of tumor mass on 100 th day after auto-HSCT were revealed: with MRI negative status, 2-year PFS was 89 % versus 50 % in a group of patients with residual tumor mass.Conclusion . MRI-negative status after auto-HSCT is a favorable prognostic factor contributing to prolonged disease-free survival.

Preoperative serum vascular endothelial growth factor as a prognostic parameter in ovarian cancer

10093 Objective: Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels have been shown to be associated with an adverse outcome in patients with ovarian cancer. We studied the clinical value of serum VEGF as an independent prognostic parameter. Methods: In the present study, we ascertained preoperative serum VEGF in a series of 314 patients with ovarian cancer. VEGF serum were evaluated in 45 new cases. Serum VEGF was evaluated prior to primary surgery in all patients. The re-analysis of previously published data comprised a total of 269 cases. Patients were treated between 1990 and 2003. Mean duration of follow-up was 38.9 (32.4) months. Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer were included into the present study, patients with other malignant ovarian tumors, borderline tumors, and benign adnexal masses were excluded. Serum VEGF was evaluated prior to primary surgery using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Quantikine Human VEGF Immunoassay; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) in all studies. Results were correlated with clinical data. Results: Median serum VEGF was 407 (238–746) pg/mL. Serum VEGF was associated with serum CA 125 (p=0.003) and residual tumor mass (p=0.02; residual tumor mass < 1cm: 375.5 [209.5–608.9] pg/mL vs. residual tumor mass ≥ 1cm: 625.2 [320.7–1046.7] pg/mL). Serum VEGF was not associated with FIGO stage (p=0.5), lymph node involvement (p=0.2), tumor grade (p=0.2), and patients’ age (p=0.08). In a univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis, FIGO stage, residual tumor mass, tumor grade, patients’ age, serum CA 125, and preoperative serum VEGF were associated with overall survival. In a multivariate Cox regression model, higher FIGO stage, presence of residual tumor mass after primary surgery, and higher serum VEGF were independently associated with a shortened overall survival. Planned subgroup analysis was performed for patients with ovarian cancer FIGO stage I. In a multivariate Cox regression model, higher tumor grade and higher serum VEGF were the only independent prognosticators for overall survival. Patients with FIGO stage I ovarian cancer and a serum VEGF ≥ 380 pg/mL had a 8-fold increased risk for experiencing cancer related death. Conclusion: Serum VEGF is an independent prognostic parameter in patients with all stages of ovarian cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Clonogenic growth in vitro: an independent biologic prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma.

A retrospective analysis was performed to investigate the prognostic value of growth in a human tumor clonogenic assay system for 84 ovarian cancer patients. A significant difference in survival probability (determined by the method of Kaplan-Meier) was found by univariate analysis between patients with ovarian carcinoma whose tumors manifested clonogenic growth (defined as growth of greater than or equal to five colonies per plate) and patients whose tumors did not grow. Clonogenic growth in vitro was associated with worse prognosis (P = .007, log-rank test). A number of generally accepted prognostic factors, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (P = .003), residual tumor mass (P less than .001), and grade (P = .011), were also of prognostic importance in our patient population. Multivariate analysis, based on the Cox regression model, identified clonogenic growth as a significant independent prognostic parameter in ovarian carcinoma (P = .031), in addition to the conventional risk factors. Estimation of survival of individual patients was best accomplished by combining the factors of residual tumor mass (P less than .05), age (P less than .01), and clonogenic growth (P less than .05) (in sequence of decreasing potential of risk).