Evangelische Theologie
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

3989
(FIVE YEARS 199)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Published By Gutersloher Verlaghaus

2198-0470, 0014-3502

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 404-405
Author(s):  
Isolde Karle

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 452-458
Author(s):  
Martin Werding

Abstract Care work can be provided in various forms and in differing institutional settings, ranging from private households over social networks and charitable organizations to public or private entities employing professional care persons. All these forms of care work create a value-added, but are subject to very different economic conditions. Focusing on professional care and building on German micro-data, the article shows preliminary evidence that there might be a »care wage-gap«, i.e., a systematic disadvantage of care workers compared to other professions in terms of their remuneration. It points out how this presumption could be thoroughly scrutinized and suggests possible reasons - among other things, the existence of informal care - that could be tested in subsequent steps.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. II-II

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 406-413
Author(s):  
Norbert Ricken

Abstract As familiar and self-evident as what is meant by ›helping‹ may seem at first, it is difficult to define ›helping‹ in a precise conceptual way. Against this backdrop, the question of what ›helping‹ is will be taken up and dealt with from a theoretical point of view. The path taken to work out and systematically define the form of helping leads to the discussion of some of the (predetermined) breaking points built into it and to the conclusion that ›helping‹ must be categorically defined differently. Recent anthropological research also suggests this by referring to the social-theoretical embedding of individuals and leaving behind individual-theoretical understandings of isolated individuals who would then enter into a relationship with each other.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 466-472
Author(s):  
Katja Sabisch

Abstract Using the terms »reproductive labour« and »care«, the contribution traces the feminist discourse on (domestic) labour. The focus is on two publications from 1977 and 2019 that, despite different theoretical traditions, refer to love as a justification for gendered social inequalities. However, love is conceptualised here one-dimensionally as an inequality-creating variable. For this reason, the contribution argues for an integration of emotion-sociological approaches into the current care debate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 445-451
Author(s):  
Georg Cremer

Abstract Markets in social services are often rejected with the argument that they do not do justice to the special nature of social services. In contrast, this article argues for thinking about how the care market should be organised so that good care can be provided. A productive approach is to use the four steering mechanisms according to J. Le Grand: Trust/motivation, command-and-control, voice and choice/competition. The regulatory debate must clarify how and in which mixes the four steering models are to be used.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 414-422
Author(s):  
Isolde Karle

Abstract The contribution starts anthropologically, following biblical narratives but also modern anthropological research, by assuming that people are fundamentally related to others and that human cultural development is based on fundamentally cooperative processes. Against this background, love of self and love of neighbour are not understood as competing patterns of behaviour; rather, they are mutually dependent. This is confirmed by empirical results with regard to volunteer work, which show that for most volunteers altruism, sociability and self-development do not denote contradictory motives, but rather interpret each other reciprocally.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 431-437
Author(s):  
Thomas Söding

Abstract In the mirror of the New Testament, helping is an authentic expression of being human. The focus is on the people who need help but should not remain dependent on it. Therefore, empathy and effectiveness are important virtues of helping. Helping makes people happy when it is done out of charity; helping brings misfortune when it becomes a means to an end. The ethos of helping is based on faith in God, who alone is able to save people's lives. This theocentrism relativises human helping and thus justifies the focus on what is humanly possible, but also the hope of transcending these limits, so that no one needs help any more, because all are filled with God's love.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document