Two-Point Discrimination in the Use of Upper Extremity Nerve Function in the AMA Guides

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-11
Author(s):  
Richard Katz
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Sensory Function ◽  
Sixth Edition ◽  
Steel Manufacturing ◽  
Nerve Recovery ◽  
Nervous System Function ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Nocturnal Awakening ◽  
Subjective Reports ◽  
Obese Male

Abstract This article presents a case report regarding a 34-year-old obese male who works as a chipper and grinder at a steel manufacturing mill and uses high-frequency vibratory power tools. He presents with typical complaints of carpal tunnel syndrome, including numbness in all five digits, wrist pain, nocturnal awakening/numbness, and others. Two-point discrimination (2PD) using a caliper was tested in the digits of the upper extremities and was 5 mm throughout. 2PD first appeared in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, and the Sixth Edition states, “sensory deficits can be challenging to grade, since the clinical examination is based on subjective reports by the patient. Grading is based on the results of sensibility testing and two-point discrimination, to improve inter-rater reliability.” The discussion of “sensibility” involves a concept of sensory perception that is more appropriate in surgery literature than neurological literature, and the discussion of the case report in this article reflects the recent literature regarding 2PD as a measure of sensibility. The authors report that sensibility is not a simple recovery of sensory function following nerve injury but rather is a complex interaction between nerve recovery and modulation of central nervous system function in spinal cord, subcortical, and cortical structures. The authors ask if the value of 2PD in the clinical assessment of impairment has been overrated within the AMA Guides, as was range of motion in the assessment of spine impairment.

Peripheral Nerve Entrapment Impairments Revisited: Part I

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8
Author(s):  
J. Mark Melhorn ◽  
James B. Talmage ◽  
Charles N. Brooks
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Nerve Entrapment ◽  
Sensory Function ◽  
Muscle Membrane ◽  
Conduction Delay ◽  
Sixth Edition ◽  
Nerve Entrapments ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, introduced the concept of diagnosis-based impairments (DBI), and a modified version of this method can be used in rating peripheral nerve injury in general (Section 5.4) and upper limb entrapment syndromes (Section 15.4f). The first portion of this article reviews the evaluation of upper extremity nerve impairment and summarizes inclusion criteria and causation correlation for carpal tunnel syndrome, Guyon's canal syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome, anterior interosseous, Wartenberg's syndrome, and radial tunnel syndrome. Very mild nerve entrapments do exist and may fail to meet the AMA Guides criteria for impairment related to a diagnosis of nerve entrapment. Electrodiagnostic examination includes nerve conduction studies that assess the largest, most heavily myelinated axons, and needle electromyelography, which detects muscle membrane instability but not the sensory function of nerves. A case example from the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, shows the process of permanent impairment rating in a case of carpal tunnel syndrome. Determination of impairment for peripheral nerve entrapments can be easily accomplished once one understands how to determine if the nerve under consideration from the electrodiagnostic evaluation demonstrates a conduction delay, a conduction block, or an axon loss. This establishes the test findings that usually are the only objective findings present.

Obstacles to Claiming Permanence and Injury-Relatedness for “Posttraumatic” Headache

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 3-6
Author(s):  
Robert J. Barth
Keyword(s):  
Complete Recovery ◽  
World Health ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Posttraumatic Headache ◽  
Sixth Edition ◽  
Causative Relationship ◽  
Short Period ◽  
The One ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Subjective Reports

Abstract “Posttraumatic” headaches claims are controversial because they are subjective reports often provided in the complex of litigation, and the underlying pathogenesis is not defined. This article reviews principles and scientific considerations in the AMAGuides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) that should be noted by evaluators who examine such cases. Some examples in the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, may seem to imply that mild head trauma can cause permanent impairment due to headache. The author examines scientific findings that present obstacles to claiming that concussion or mild traumatic brain injury is a cause of permanent headache. The World Health Organization, for example, found a favorable prognosis for posttraumatic headache, and complete recovery over a short period of time was the norm. Other studies have highlighted the lack of a dose-response correlation between trauma and prolonged headache complaints, both in terms of the frequency and the severity of trauma. On the one hand, scientific studies have failed to support the hypothesis of a causative relationship between trauma and permanent or prolonged headaches; on the other hand, non–trauma-related factors are strongly associated with complaints of prolonged headache.

Entrapment Neuropathies: Electrodiagnostic Criteria

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
Jay Blaisdell ◽  
James B. Talmage
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Conduction ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Conduction Block ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Conduction Delay ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Sixth Edition ◽  
Entrapment Neuropathies ◽  
Axon Loss ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract Like the diagnosis-based impairment (DBI) method and the range-of-motion (ROM) method for rating permanent impairment, the approach for rating compression or entrapment neuropathy in the upper extremity (eg, carpal tunnel syndrome [CTS]) is a separate and distinct methodology in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition. Rating entrapment neuropathies is similar to the DBI method because the evaluator uses three grade modifiers (ie, test findings, functional history, and physical evaluation findings), but the way these modifiers are applied is different from that in the DBI method. Notably, the evaluator must have valid nerve conduction test results and cannot diagnose or rate nerve entrapment or compression without them; postoperative nerve conduction studies are not necessary for impairment rating purposes. The AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, uses criteria that match those established by the Normative Data Task Force and endorsed by the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM); evaluators should be aware of updated definitions of normal from AANEM. It is possible that some patients may be diagnosed with carpal or cubital tunnel syndrome for treatment but will not qualify for that diagnosis for impairment rating; evaluating physicians must be familiar with electrodiagnostic test results to interpret them and determine if they confirm to the criteria for conduction delay, conduction block, or axon loss; if this is not the case, the evaluator may use the DBI method with the diagnosis of nonspecific pain.

Clinical Update: Assessing Maximum Medical Improvement in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
James B. Talmage
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Proper Time ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Medical Evaluation ◽  
Nerve Recovery ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract Permanent impairment cannot be assessed until the patient is at maximum medical improvement (MMI), but the proper time to test following carpal tunnel release often is not clear. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) states: “Factors affecting nerve recovery in compression lesions include nerve fiber pathology, level of injury, duration of injury, and status of end organs,” but age is not prognostic. The AMA Guides clarifies: “High axonotmesis lesions may take 1 to 2 years for maximum recovery, whereas even lesions at the wrist may take 6 to 9 months for maximal recovery of nerve function.” The authors review 3 studies that followed patients’ long-term recovery of hand function after open carpal tunnel release surgery and found that estimates of MMI ranged from 25 weeks to 24 months (for “significant improvement”) to 18 to 24 months. The authors suggest that if the early results of surgery suggest a patient's improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) and an examination shows few or no symptoms, the result can be assessed early. If major symptoms and ADL problems persist, the examiner should wait at least 6 to 12 months, until symptoms appear to stop improving. A patient with carpal tunnel syndrome who declines a release can be rated for impairment, and, as appropriate, the physician may wish to make a written note of this in the medical evaluation report.

A CASE REPORT OF ACUTE CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME CAUSED BY VENOUS THROMBOSIS

Hand Surgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 137-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Abe ◽  
Masahiko Saito
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Nerve Compression ◽  
Ulnar Neuropathy ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Ulnar Nerve Compression ◽  
Compression Neuropathy ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Compression neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow is well-recognised as cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). Many causes of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow have been identified. A previously unreported finding of ulnar nerve compression in the cubital tunnel caused by a thrombosed proximal ulnar recurrent artery vena comitans is described.

Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Orthopedics ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 758-760
Author(s):  
G M O'Malley ◽  
C S Lambdin ◽  
G S McCleary
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Tarsal Tunnel ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document