Clinical Trial Evidence for the Real World

2019 ◽  
Vol 179 (10) ◽  
pp. 1333
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Ross ◽  
Ken Covinsky
2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron C. Tan ◽  
Drexell H. Boggs ◽  
Eudocia Q. Lee ◽  
Michelle M. Kim ◽  
Minesh P. Mehta ◽  
...  

Brain metastases cause significant morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced cancer. In the era of precision oncology and immunotherapy, there are rapidly evolving systemic treatment options. These novel therapies may have variable intracranial efficacy, and patients with brain metastases remain a population of special interest. Typically, only patients with stable, asymptomatic and/or treated brain metastases are enrolled in clinical trials, or may be excluded altogether, particularly in the setting of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Consequently, this leads to significant concerns on the external validity of clinical trial evidence to real-world clinical practice. Here we describe the current trends in cancer clinical trial eligibility for patients with brain metastases in both early and late phase trials, with a focus on targeted and immunotherapies. We evaluate recent newly FDA approved therapies and the clinical trial evidence base leading to approval. This includes analysis of inclusion and exclusion criteria, requirements for baseline screening for brain metastases, surveillance cerebral imaging and incorporation of trial endpoints for patients with brain metastases. Finally, the use of alternative sources of data such as real-world evidence with registries and collaborative studies will be discussed.


Author(s):  
Wern Yew Ding ◽  
José Miguel Rivera‐Caravaca ◽  
Francisco Marín ◽  
Guowei Li ◽  
Vanessa Roldán ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175346661880061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar Rivera-Ortega ◽  
Conal Hayton ◽  
John Blaikley ◽  
Colm Leonard ◽  
Nazia Chaudhuri

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fibrotic interstitial lung disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Previously, IPF has been managed using immunosuppressive therapy; however, it has been shown that this is associated with increased mortality. In the last 5 years, two disease-modifying agents have been licensed for use in IPF, namely pirfenidone and nintedanib. Nintedanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antifibrotic properties that has also been shown to significantly reduce the progression of the disease. The scientific evidence shows that nintedanib is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of IPF in mild, moderate and severe stages of the disease. Real-world experiences also support the findings of previously conducted clinical trials and show that nintedanib is effective for the management of IPF and is associated with reducing disease progression. Gastrointestinal events, mainly diarrhoea, are the main adverse events caused by the treatment. Recent real-word studies also suggest that nintedanib stabilizes lung function till lung transplantation, with no increased surgical complications or postoperative mortality after lung transplantation. In this review, we will discuss the clinical trial evidence and real-world experience for nintedanib in the management of IPF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. e1912869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria L. Bartlett ◽  
Sanket S. Dhruva ◽  
Nilay D. Shah ◽  
Patrick Ryan ◽  
Joseph S. Ross

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document