scholarly journals Assessment of Radiation Doses Delivered to Organs at Risk Among Patients With Early-Stage Favorable Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. e2013935
Author(s):  
Chelsea C. Pinnix ◽  
Jillian R. Gunther ◽  
Penny Fang ◽  
Mikaela E Bankston ◽  
Sarah A. Milgrom ◽  
...  
Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3744
Author(s):  
Pierre Loap ◽  
Ludovic De Marzi ◽  
Alfredo Mirandola ◽  
Remi Dendale ◽  
Alberto Iannalfi ◽  
...  

Consolidative radiation therapy for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) improves progression-free survival. Unfortunately, first-generation techniques, relying on large irradiation fields, were associated with an increased risk of secondary cancers, and of cardiac and lung toxicity. Fortunately, the use of smaller target volumes combined with technological advances in treatment techniques currently allows efficient organs-at-risk sparing without altering tumoral control. Recently, proton therapy has been evaluated for mediastinal HL treatment due to its potential to significantly reduce the dose to organs-at-risk, such as cardiac substructures. This is expected to limit late radiation-induced toxicity and possibly, second-neoplasm risk, compared with last-generation intensity-modulated radiation therapy. However, the democratization of this new technique faces multiple issues. Determination of which patient may benefit the most from proton therapy is subject to intense debate. The development of new effective systemic chemotherapy and organizational, societal, and political considerations might represent impediments to the larger-scale implementation of HL proton therapy. Based on the current literature, this critical review aims to discuss current challenges and controversies that may impede the larger-scale implementation of mediastinal HL proton therapy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 228-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Efstathiou ◽  
J. J. Paly ◽  
H. Lu ◽  
B. S. Athar ◽  
A. Niemierko ◽  
...  

228 Background: Seminoma constitutes the majority of testicular cancers and 75% percent of patients present with localized disease. Given that seminoma remains the most curable solid tumor, concerns of toxicity including late sequelae such as excess malignancies have given pause to the use of conventional adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) following orchiectomy for early-stage seminoma. As a result of the unique physical dose deposition characteristics of protons to avoid normal tissue, we evaluated both photon and proton beam therapy (PBT) treatment plans for para-aortic irradiation to assess dose distributions to organs at-risk and model rates of second cancers. Methods: Ten patients with stage I seminoma treated with conventional adjuvant para-aortic AP-PA photon RT to 25.5 Gy between 2004-2009 at Massachusetts General Hospital had PBT plans generated (AP-PA and PA alone). The dose differences to critical organs, as modeled by Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD), were examined. The risks of second primary malignancies were calculated using validated methods and compared both to each other and to baseline population risks. Results: PBT plans were superior to photons in limiting dose to organs at-risk. The volume of whole body normal tissue spared 0.1 Gy was 9.0L and 7.8L for PA and AP-PA protons, respectively, compared to photons. The volume spared 1Gy was 5.0L and 3.8L for PA and AP-PA protons, respectively; while the volume spared 10Gy was 1.3L and 0.85L, respectively. PBT decreased the EUD by 46% (8.2 Gy) and 64% (10.2 Gy) to the stomach and large bowel, respectively (p<0.01), presumably translating into lower levels of nausea and fatigue. Notably, PBT was found to avert 612 excess second cancers among a population of 10,000 men diagnosed at age 35 and surviving to age 75 (p<0.01). Conclusions: In this comparative dosimetric and modeling study, the use of protons provided a favorable dose distribution with an ability to limit unnecessary exposure to critical normal structures in the treatment of stage I seminoma patients. It is expected that this will translate into decreased acute toxicity and reduced risk of second cancers, for which prospective studies are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Werner-Wasik ◽  
Xiaoli Yu ◽  
Lawrence B Marks ◽  
Timothy E Schultheiss

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hutchinson ◽  
P. Bridge

AbstractPurposeTo establish whether the use of a passive or active technique of planning target volume (PTV) definition and treatment methods for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) deliver the most effective results. This literature review assesses the advantages and disadvantages in recent studies of each, while assessing the validity of the two approaches for planning and treatment.MethodsA systematic review of literature focusing on the planning and treatment of radiation therapy to NSCLC tumours. Different approaches which have been published in recent articles are subjected to critical appraisal in order to determine their relative efficacy.ResultsFree-breathing (FB) is the optimal method to perform planning scans for patients and departments, as it involves no significant increase in cost, workload or education. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) is the fastest form of delineation, however it is noted to be less accurate than the ten-phase overlap approach for computed tomography (CT). Although gating has proven to reduce margins and facilitate sparing of organs at risk, treatment times can be longer and planning time can be as much as 15 times higher for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This raises issues with patient comfort and stabilisation, impacting on the chance of geometric miss. Stereotactic treatments can take up to 3 hours to treat, along with increases in planning and treatment, as well as the additional hardware, software and training required.ConclusionFour-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is superior to 3DCT, with the passive FB approach for PTV delineation and treatment optimal. Departments should use a combination of MIP with visual confirmation ensuring coverage for stage 1 disease. Stages 2–3 should be delineated using ten-phases overlaid. Stereotactic and gated treatments for early stage disease should be used accordingly; FB-IMRT is optimal for latter stage disease.


Hematology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (1) ◽  
pp. 313-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph M. Meyer ◽  
Richard T. Hoppe

Abstract The results of recent clinical trials for the management of limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma have led to considerable debate, especially regarding the role of radiation therapy. This review highlights those recent trials and provides perspectives regarding their interpretation from a radiation oncologist and a hematologist. The trial protocol is available at http://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa1111961/suppl_file/nejmoa1111961_protocol.pdf.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document