scholarly journals Increased Risk of Mucinous Neoplasm of the Appendix in Adults Undergoing Interval Appendectomy

JAMA Surgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 148 (8) ◽  
pp. 703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Furman ◽  
Mitchell Cahan ◽  
Philip Cohen ◽  
Laura A. Lambert
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 311-315
Author(s):  
Jungtak Son ◽  
Yong Jun Park ◽  
Sung Ryol Lee ◽  
Hyung Ook Kim ◽  
Kyung Uk Jung

Purpose: The low rate of recurrent appendicitis after initial nonsurgical management of complicated appendicitis supports the recently implemented strategy of omitting routine interval appendectomy. However, several reports have suggested an increased incidence rate of neoplasms in these patients. We aimed to identify the risk of neoplasms in the population undergoing interval appendectomy.Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed consecutive cases of appendicitis that were treated surgically between January 2014 and December 2018 at a single tertiary referral center. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they underwent immediate or interval appendectomy. Demographics and perioperative clinical and pathologic parameters were analyzed.Results: All 2,013 adults included in the study underwent surgical treatment because of an initial diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Of these, 5.5% (111 of 2,013) underwent interval appendectomy. Appendiceal neoplasm was identified on pathologic analysis in 36 cases (1.8%). The incidence of neoplasm in the interval group was 12.6% (14 of 111), which was significantly higher than that of the immediate group (1.2% [22 of 1,902], P < 0.001). Conclusion: The incidence rate of neoplasms was significantly higher in patients undergoing interval appendectomy.These findings should be considered when choosing treatment options after successful nonsurgical management of complicated appendicitis.


2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne G. Carpenter ◽  
Alyssa B. Chapital ◽  
Marianne V. Merritt ◽  
Daniel J. Johnson

Appendicitis is a common diagnosis encountered by the acute care surgeon. Management of complicated appendicitis is controversial and often involves initial nonoperative therapy with interval appendectomy. This study reviews single-institutional experience with management of complicated appendicitis with interval appendectomy and addresses an unusually high occurrence of incidental appendiceal malignancies observed with a review of relevant literature. A retrospective review of all diagnoses of appendicitis was performed over 5 years at a tertiary care center. Patient demographics, time to surgery, operative technique, pathologic diagnosis, and clinical outcomes were examined. Three hundred fifteen patients were diagnosed with acute appendicitis. Of these, 24 (7.6%) were deemed complicated and did not undergo immediate appendectomy, and 18 ultimately underwent appendectomy at our institution and were included in analysis. There were no statistical demographic or symptomatic differences between the immediate and interval appendectomy patients. Ninety-nine per cent of the immediate appendectomy patients were treated laparoscopically; 78 per cent of the interval group underwent attempted laparoscopic treatment with 56 per cent completed without conversion to open ( P < 0.01). Neoplasms were discovered in 1 per cent of the acute appendectomy group and 28 per cent of the interval appendectomy group ( P < 0.0001). Two of the three neoplasms in the acute group were carcinoid, whereas three of the five neoplasms in the interval group were adenocarcinoma. Surgeons should consider appendiceal or colonic neoplasms in cases of complicated appendicitis when nonoperative management is considered. This is most important in patients older than 40 years, in those who forego interval appendectomy, or in those who could be lost to follow-up.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 430-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Jason Furman ◽  
Mitchell Cahan ◽  
Philip Cohen ◽  
Giles Francis Whalen ◽  
Laura A. Lambert

430 Background: The role of interval appendectomy after conservative management of perforated appendicitis remains controversial. Determining the etiology of perforated appendicitis is one reason to perform interval appendectomies. This study hypothesizes that there is an increased rate of neoplasm in patients undergoing interval appendectomy. Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients over 18 years of age who underwent appendectomy for presumed appendicitis from January, 2006 to December, 2010 at a single, tertiary care institution. Demographic data, pathologic diagnosis, clinico-pathologic characteristics, interval resection rate, and complication data were collected and analyzed. Results: During the study period, 376 patients underwent appendectomy. The mean age was 41 years (range 18 to 94). Interval appendectomy was performed in 18 patients (5.0%) (age 28 to 74). Neoplasms were identified in 14 patients (3.7 %); 6 were found in patients who had undergone interval appendectomy (33%). Nine were mucinous tumors (69.2%), 5 of which were associated with interval appendectomies. Neoplasms were identified in 8.3% of patients between 35 and 55 years old. Conclusions: Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix were found in 33% of patients undergoing interval appendectomy. Interval appendectomies should be considered in all patients 35 years and older due to increased risk of appendiceal neoplasm. [Table: see text]


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-450
Author(s):  
Nikola Panic ◽  
Gabriele Capurso ◽  
Fabia Attili ◽  
Giovanna Vitale ◽  
Serena Stigliano ◽  
...  

Background & Aims: It has been reported that patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas are at an increased risk of colorectal cancer. The aim of our study was to investigate whether patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms are at a higher risk of colorectal adenomas with respect to the general population, as this condition represents the precursor of sporadic colorectal cancer. Methods: A case–control study was conducted at the Catholic University and University Sapienza, Rome, Italy. The cases were patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms without history of colorectal cancer, who had underwent screening colonoscopy for the first time. The controls were individuals who had underwent first time colonoscopy for screening or evaluation of non-specific abdominal symptoms. Chi-square and Fisher tests were used to compare the distributions of categorical variables. Results: We enrolled 122 cases and 246 controls. Colorectal polyps were found in 52 cases (42.6%) and 79 controls (32.1%) (p<0.05). In 29 cases (23.8%) and 57 controls (23.2%) histological examination disclosed adenomatous polyps (p=0.90). There was no difference between the groups in relation to the presence of polyps with low-grade (19.7% vs. 19.8%, p=0.98) and high-grade dysplasia (4.9% vs. 4.5%, p=0.85). Conclusion: Patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas are not at an increased risk for the development of adenomatous colorectal polyps. Abbreviations: BD-IPMN: branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; CRC: colorectal cancer; FAP: familiar adenomatous polyposis; FNA: fine needle aspiration; FOBT: fecal occult blood test; HNPCC: hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; IPMN: intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; M-IPMN: mixed intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; MD-IPMNs: main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; PDAC: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; S-MRCP: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with secretin stimulation.


2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-106
Author(s):  
D. Henzler ◽  
R. Kramer ◽  
U. H. Steinhorst ◽  
S. Piepenbrock ◽  
R. Rossaint ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A602-A602
Author(s):  
A PEZZOLI ◽  
V MATARESE ◽  
B PAOLA ◽  
R MICHELE ◽  
G SUSANNA ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 497-497
Author(s):  
James Armitage ◽  
Nokuthaba Sibanda ◽  
Paul Cathcart ◽  
Mark Emberton ◽  
Jan Van Der Meulen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document