Job Performance: Assessment Issues in Personnel Selection

Author(s):  
Chockalingam Viswesvaran ◽  
Deniz S. Ones
1983 ◽  
Vol 27 (13) ◽  
pp. 1053-1057
Author(s):  
Robert J. Jones ◽  
Eduardo Salas ◽  
Elizabeth W. Pitts ◽  
Gary L. Allen ◽  
Ben B. Morgan

The increasing technological sophistication of organizations and the concomitant requirement for individuals to process large quantities of information has raised questions concerning the efficacy of traditional approaches to performance assessment within the personnel subsystem. Traditional approaches to aptitude testing have focused on relating psychometric profiles to subsequent job performance. These approaches are subject to criticism in that they use static measures (test scores) to predict the dynamic processes of learning and are heavily influenced by prior experience without reflecting the ability to acquire new information. An alternative to traditional psychometric approaches to personnel selection is the use of rate parameters (reflecting change in performance over time) derived from relatively complex cognitive tasks as predictors of training success. The use of microprocessor-administered tasks to assess cognitive skills and abilities is an integral part of this alternative approach. The use of computer-administered Complex Experimental Learning Tasks (CELTS) for the assessment of learning abilities illustrates the computerized, rate-based approach to performance assessment. The purpose of this paper is to describe an initial study to determine the predictability of learning rate measures for performance assessment and to suggest needed future developments in training as well as job performance research.


1996 ◽  
Vol 83 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1195-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús F. Salgado ◽  
Silvia Moscoso

Rating scales are most frequently used to assess the criterion in studies of validity in personnel selection. However, only a few articles report the interrater reliability for these scales. This paper presents four meta-analyses in which the inter-rater reliability was estimated for Civil Composite Criterion, Military Composite Criterion, Total Composite Criterion, and Single Civil Criterion. Mean reliabilities were .64, .53, .62, and .40, respectively. The implications of these findings for single and meta-analytic studies are discussed.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohd Hanafiah Ahmad ◽  
Gusman Nawanir ◽  
Mohd Rashid Ab Hamid

The purpose of personnel selection is to measure knowledge, skills, and abilities that are necessary to perform a job effectively. The process involves various assessments, including personality assessment. This conceptual paper discussed the potential of using a learning factory to develop multiple simulations for assessment center activities in assessing personality in different situations. Although traditional personality assessment contributes to the effectiveness of selection decisions and prediction, it tended to ignore that trait-related behaviors may differ across situations. Study on dynamic personality is essential as empirical studies showed that within-person fluctuations in personality states relate to a variety of work outcomes, including job performance. To further understand this fundamental issue, this paper discussed further how personality–situation interplay influences performance by using a learning factory assessment center method. This study also discussed how the adaptation of exploratory mixed methods approach could be used. The mixed exploratory methods are suitable as this topic is related to fundamental research and empirical study, besides the investigation on this area is still limited. This paper could benefit other researchers, industry players, and policymakers in understanding better how dynamic personality may influence performance, especially in the activities related to Industry 4.0.


2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udo Konradt ◽  
Yvonne Garbers ◽  
Martina Böge ◽  
Berrin Erdogan ◽  
Talya N. Bauer

Drawing on Gilliland’s selection fairness framework, we examined antecedents and behavioral effects of applicant procedural fairness perceptions before, during, and after a personnel selection procedure using a six-wave longitudinal research design. Results showed that both perceived post-test fairness and pre-feedback fairness perceptions are related to job offer acceptance and job performance after 18 months, but not to job performance after 36 months. Pre-test and post-test procedural fairness perceptions were mainly related to formal characteristics and interpersonal treatment, whereas pre-feedback fairness perceptions were related to formal characteristics and explanations. The impact of fairness attributes of formal characteristics and interpersonal treatment diminished over time, whereas attributes of explanation were only associated with pre-feedback fairness. Results are discussed in terms of theoretical implications for fairness research and for hiring organizations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document