Real‐world 6 and 12‐month Drug Retention, Remission and Response Rates of Secukinumab in 2,017 Psoriatic Arthritis patients in 13 European Countries

Background: A greater understanding of the everyday experiences of people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and their carers may help improve clinical practice. Objective: The Parkinson’s Real-world Impact assesSMent (PRISM) study evaluated medication use, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the use of healthcare resources by people with PD and their carers. Methods: PRISM is an observational cross-sectional study, in which people with PD and their carers completed an online survey using structured questionnaires, including the Parkinson’s Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ-39), Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (NMSQuest) and Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Results: Data were collected from 861 people with PD (mean age, 65.0 years; mean disease duration, 7.7 years) and 256 carers from six European countries. People with PD reported a large number of different co-morbidities, non-motor symptoms (mean NMSQuest score, 12.8), and impaired HRQoL (median PDQ-39 summary score, 29.1). Forty-five percent of people with PD reported at least one impulse control behaviour. Treatment patterns varied considerably between different European countries. Levodopa was taken in the last 12 months by 85.9% of participants, and as monotherapy by 21.8% . Carers, who were mostly female (64.8%) and the partner/spouse of the person with PD (82.1%), reported mild to moderate burden (mean ZBI total score, 26.6). Conclusions: The PRISM study sheds light on the lives of people with PD and those who care for them, re-emphasising the many challenges they face in everyday life. The study also provides insights into the current treatment of PD in Europe.

Download Full-text

AB0809 HOW WELL ARE BIOLOGICS RETAINED IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS - A REAL WORLD STUDY

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.1945 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1706.1-1706

Author(s):

I. Jawad ◽

M. K. Nisar

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Real World ◽

Biologic Therapy ◽

Health Economy ◽

Nice Guidelines ◽

Drug Survival ◽

Gi Symptoms ◽

Conventional Dmards ◽

Significant Difference

Background:Biologics have led to a sea change in the management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with unprecedented improvement in the signs, symptoms and radiographic damage, resulting in improvement in functionality and quality of life. However longitudinal data for their retention and tolerability is sparse.Objectives:Our objective was to evaluate real-world biologic therapy duration and reasons for discontinuing treatment.Methods:We conducted a retrospective analysis of our PsA electronic register from 1994 up to and including April 2019 at our university teaching hospital. We had access to full patient records including details on co-morbidities, drugs and disease management.Results:335 patients were identified with PsA. 58% of them were female with mean age of 46 yr (13-81). 113 (33.7%) patients had been treated with a biologic with 105 (93%) continuing at the time of analysis. 60 individuals were prescribed combination therapy with DMARDs. Mean age was 43.3 years (13-81) with 56% women. The biologics sample was ethnically diverse including 80% White Caucasian patients, 17% Asian and others (3%). Significant co-morbidities included cardiovascular disease (18.6%) and diabetes (4.4%). Eight different biologics were in use with adalimumab being the most prescribed (67%).35 (30.9%) patients had stopped biologics at some point with 76 episodes of cessation. 6% of our sample had discontinued two or more biologic treatments. The mean duration before biologic therapy was discontinued was 18.2 months (8 days to 9.5 years), which was almost twice as long as the average period before discontinuing a DMARD (9.9 months). Main reasons for stopping treatment included 23% each due to GI symptoms, neurological causes, cutaneous symptoms and other side effects. The remaining 8% reported fatigue as the reason for stopping therapy.Conclusion:To our knowledge this is the first dedicated retrospective review of a large real world PsA cohort comparing drug survival and tolerability of biologics against DMARDs. Biologic therapies are well tolerated in psoriatic arthritis. There is no significant difference amongst various modes of action. Over a quarter of the patients discontinue the drug owing to intolerance with mean drug survival of 18 months. In contrast nearly two-thirds were intolerant of DMARDs and stopped within ten months. Thus both the rate and duration of biologic retention is significantly better than conventional DMARDs. This has significant economic impact as NICE guidelines require an adequate trial of two DMARDs for six months prior to advanced therapy. However, this approach is unlikely to be cost effective as the disease progresses whilst patients struggle with DMARDs prescription and thus delay biologics which are more likely to be tolerated and retained longer. Hence there is an urgent need to review NICE guidelines to allow earlier employment of biologics in the treatment paradigm with significant benefits to both patients and the health economy.Disclosure of Interests:Issrah Jawad: None declared, Muhammad Khurram Nisar Grant/research support from: Muhammad Nisar undertakes clinical trials and received support (including attendance at conferences, speaker fees and honoraria) from Roche, Chugai, MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, BMS, Celgene, Novartis and UCB, Consultant of: Muhammad Nisar undertakes clinical trials and received support (including attendance at conferences, speaker fees and honoraria) from Roche, Chugai, MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, BMS, Celgene, Novartis and UCB, Speakers bureau: Muhammad Nisar undertakes clinical trials and received support (including attendance at conferences, speaker fees and honoraria) from Roche, Chugai, MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, BMS, Celgene, Novartis and UCB

Download Full-text

SAT0432 EFFECT OF SEX ON DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS AND DISEASE IMPACT IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS (PsA): INSIGHTS FROM THE REAL-WORLD, OBSERVATIONAL MULTINATIONAL PsABio COHORT

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2771 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1171.1-1173

Author(s):

M. T. Nurmohamed ◽

I. Van der Horst-Bruinsma ◽

A. W. Van Kuijk ◽

S. Siebert ◽

P. Bergmans ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Physical Functioning ◽

Real World ◽

Comprehensive Treatment ◽

Diagnosis Delay ◽

Health State ◽

Research Support ◽

Disease Characteristics ◽

Disease Impact

Background:Female sex has been associated with more severe disease and poorer treatment outcomes in PsA. These observations are often based on small populations or national cohorts/registries.Objectives:To investigate the effects of sex on disease characteristics and disease impact in PsA, using data of 929 consecutive patients (pts) from PsABio.Methods:PsABio is a real-world, non-interventional European study in PsA pts treated with UST or TNFi based on their rheumatologist’s choice. Observed male and female baseline (BL) data were described and compared using 95% CI.Results:Women in PsABio (n=512 [55%]) were numerically older than men (mean [SD]: 50.5 [12.7] / 48.7 [12.3] years, respectively). Women were more obese (BMI >30), % (95% CI): F: 35 (30, 39), M: 24 (20, 29), men more overweight (BMI >25–30): F: 31 (27, 36), M:51 (46, 57). Age at diagnosis, delay from first symptom to diagnosis, and disease duration were similar for both sexes.Women entered PsABio more often on 3rd line treatment, whereas men started on 1st-line biologic treatment more often (F/M 1st line 47%/55%; 2nd line 34%/33%; 3rd line 20%/12%). Numerically, concomitant MTX was given more often to women vs men (32% vs 27%). At BL, 60% of women and 64% of men were on NSAIDs; 7.9% and 2.5% on antidepressant drugs. Women had significantly more comorbidities, with numerically more cardiovascular disease and anxiety/depression, and 3 times more IBD.Women had significantly higher 68 tender joint counts (TJC): 13.0 vs 10.4, while 66 swollen joint counts were not significantly different: 5.8 vs 5.5. Axial or combined axial-peripheral disease was similarly frequent, in 29% of women and 26% of men (Figs. 1, 2).Clinical Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) was higher in women (31.8 vs 27.3); pt-reported levels of pain, global disease activity (VAS scales) and higher TJC contributed to this. While enthesitis prevalence (based on Leeds Enthesitis Index) was comparable, men had significantly more frequent dactylitis, nail disease and worse skin psoriasis. At BL, 3.4% of women vs 7.1% of men, were in MDA.Regarding physical functioning (HAQ-DI), impact of disease (PSAID-12) and quality of life (EQ5D-3L health state), women with PsA starting a biologic (b)DMARD, expressed significantly greater negative impact and more limitations due to their disease (Fig. 2).Conclusion:In routine care, women with PsA starting a bDMARD presented with worse outcomes over a range of assessments compared with men (higher pt-reported pain and disease activity, TJC, and worse physical functioning and QoL), while men had worse dactylitis and psoriasis. Follow-up analysis will report whether the effects of biologic therapy are different in both sexes. The increased prevalence of associated features related to pain and impact on functioning and QoL may indicate the need for a more comprehensive treatment approach for women to avoid unnecessary and premature bDMARD stop or switch.Acknowledgments:This study was funded by Janssen.Disclosure of Interests:Michael T Nurmohamed Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Arno WR van Kuijk Grant/research support from: Janssen, Stefan Siebert Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Paul Bergmans Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen, Kurt de Vlam Consultant of: Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau and honoraria, Elisa Gremese Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Tatiana Korotaeva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Wim Noel Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals NV, Petros Sfikakis Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from Abvie, Novartis, MSD, Actelion, Amgen, Pfizer, Janssen Pharmaceutical, UCB, Elke Theander Employee of: Janssen-Cilag Sweden AB, Josef S. Smolen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Laure Gossec Grant/research support from: Lilly, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB

Download Full-text

AB0799 REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE OF SECUKINUMAB FOR PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS WITH AXIAL INVOLVEMENT.

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.6564 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1699.3-1699

Author(s):

M. Martin Lopez ◽

B. Joven-Ibáñez ◽

J. L. Pablos

Keyword(s):

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Real World ◽

Spinal Pain ◽

Tender Joint Count ◽

P Value ◽

X Ray ◽

Activity Assessment ◽

Real World Setting ◽

Axial Involvement

Background:Evidence on the efficacy of biologics in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients with axial manifestations affecting 30-70% of PsA patients is limited. Secukinumab (SEC) has provided significant and sustained improvement in the signs and symptoms of active PsA and ankylosing spondylitis.Objectives:This study aims to analyze the experience of using SEC for PsA patients with axial involvement in real-world setting.Methods:Multicentric observational, longitudinal, retrospective study conducted in a tertiary hospital between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients with PsA (CASPAR criteria) and clinical and/or image diagnosis of axial involvement receiving at least one dose of SEC were included. Patients with non-pathological sacroiliacs x-ray and MRI had to have spinal pain VAS ≥4/10 after failure to NSAIDs, prior to the onset of SEC, to be included. Medical records were reviewed to collect demographic and clinical data, features of PsA (manifestations, treatments and activity assessment). Descriptive statistics and then a comparative analysis with the Studentt-test to analyze the effectiveness of SEC were performed.Results:Of 98 PsA patients treated with SEC, 58 (59.2%) had axial involvement, of which 41 (71%) female. Mean age was 54 y.o (SD 10) and average duration of the disease was 10 years (SD 8). All 58 patients had peripheral disease (33% joint erosions), 55 (95%) had psoriasis, 20 (34%) showed dactilitis and 39 (67%) had enthesitis. Sacroiliacs x-ray was damaged in 38 (66%) patients (grade I-IV) and 23 (40%) pathological MRI, with HLAB27+ at 8 (14%) patients. Average BMI was 29 (SD 8), with an obesity rate of 33% (19 pt). Observed comorbidities were hypertension (27 pt, 47%), diabetes mellitus (6 pt, 10%), dyslipidemia (23 pt, 40%), active smoking (18 pt, 31%) and malignancy (6 pt, 10%). Regarding previous treatments, 90% had received cDMARDs, particularly methotrexate (86%) and 40 (69%) had been exposed to at least one bDMARD (15 pt to one, 9 to two, 6 to three and 10 to four or more). 7 patients were on 300 mg dose and 51 patients on 150 mg dose (dose escalation to 300 mg was performed in 16 patients and 44% respond and maintain SEC). Average drug survival time was 1.4 (SD 1) years. At 6 months of SEC therapy, tender and swollen joint count, spinal pain VAS, CRP, ASDAS-CRP and DAPSA had significantly decreased (Table 1). 29 (50%) patients suspended SEC during follow-up due to primary ineffectiveness (8), secondary ineffectiveness (16), adverse events (3), latex allergy (1) and remission (1). Adverse events do not differ from those reported in clinical trials.Table 1.Disease activity assessment at 6 months of secukinumab therapy.Baseline6 months after SECMean differenceP valueSJC4,8±5,41,9±3,1-2,8 (IC95% -3,9 a -1,7)p<0,0001TJC7,7±5,83,9±4,1-3,8 (IC95% -5,1 a -2,4)p<0,0001Spinal pVAS6,1±3,24,2±2,9-1,9 (IC95% -2,4 a -1,4)p<0,0001CRP (mg/L)7,7±9,94,9±5,9-2,9 (IC95% -4,5 a -1,2)p=0,0009ASDAS-CRP2,5±1,91,8±1,3-0,7 (IC95% -0,9 a -0,4)p<0,0001DAPSA27,7±12,116,7±10,4-11 (IC95% -15,3 a -6,8)p<0,0001SJC: swollen joint count, TJC: tender joint count, Spinal pVAS: spinal pain visual analog scale, CRP: C-reactive protein, SEC: secukinumab.Conclusion:Secukinumab in real-world setting provided improvements in the axial and peripheral manifestations of PsA, using both the 150 mg and 300 mg doses.Disclosure of Interests:MARIA MARTIN LOPEZ: None declared, Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, José Luis Pablos: None declared

Download Full-text

FRI0276 EARLY TREATMENT WITH ANTI-TNF IS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHER RESPONSE RATES IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE AXSPA

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.4113 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 725.2-725

Author(s):

S. Gulle ◽

İ. Sari ◽

E. Durak Ediboglu ◽

H. Candan ◽

F. Onen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Survival Rates ◽

Response Rates ◽

Retention Rates ◽

Symptom Duration ◽

Early Disease ◽

Drug Retention ◽

Predictors Of Response ◽

Group 3 ◽

Group 2 ◽

Group 1

Background:Treatment options for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is currently limited, and up to 40% of the patients require biologic therapies to control symptoms. Early commencement of biologics suggested to have higher response rates but data regarding this subject is limited.Objectives:The primary aim was to investigate tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) response and retention rates in axSpA patients who were treated in the early disease period (symptom duration (≤5 years). Our secondary aim was to identify factors predicting response to TNFi.Methods:Adult axial SpA patients who started TNFi treatments within the five years of their symptoms were identified and defined as “Group 1”. Patients whose TNFi treatments started five years after their initial symptoms served as a control group (Group 2: 5-10 years and Group3: ≥10 years). Response and survival rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were calculated. Predictors of response on TNFi survival at 24 months were also analyzed.Results:There was a total of 364 axiSpA (Group 1: 95, Group 2: 82 and Group 3: 187) patients in the study (69.8% male, 46.8±12.6 years). Group 1 patients tended to be younger, with a lower baseline CRP titers and lower HLA–B27 rate compared to the other groups. Drug survival rates were similar between the groups. This finding also remained similar when AS and nraxSpA patients analyzed separately. However, regardless of symptom duration, the drug retention rates were significantly higher in the AS group than in nraxSpA (Table 2). ASAS40 responses were higher in Group 1 than in Group 3 both at 12 and 24 months. Predictors of response based on ASAS40 at 24 months were treatment within the five years of the symptoms (OR:2.2) and age at baseline (OR:0.97) in univariate analysis. However, baseline ASDAS (OR:1.4) was the only factor in multiple regression.Conclusion:In this study we showed the following: 1) TNFi started in the early disease course resulted in a better ASAS40 response at both 12 and 24 months, 2) TNFi timing (started in the early or late disease period) seems not affecting drug retention rates, and 3) baseline disease activity is the most important predictor in achieving ASAS40 response at 24 months.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

Incidence and Impact of Persistent Viremia on SVR Rates in Patients Receiving Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa569 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (12) ◽

Author(s):

Alicia B Carver ◽

Autumn D Zuckerman ◽

Joshua DeClercq ◽

Leena Choi ◽

Cody A Chastain

Keyword(s):

Antiviral Therapy ◽

Real World ◽

Sustained Virologic Response ◽

Response Rates ◽

Virologic Response ◽

Direct Acting Antiviral ◽

Rapid Virologic Response ◽

Persistent Viremia ◽

Direct Acting ◽

High Sustained Virologic Response

Abstract Rates of persistent viremia (PV) while on direct-acting antiviral therapy were low (5.7%) in a real-world cohort of 983 patients. High sustained virologic response rates were achieved both in patients with PV (92.9%) and those with rapid virologic response (96.5%), without significant differences.

Download Full-text

AB0649 REAL WORLD EFFICACY OF SECUKINUMAB: A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.4311 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1619-1620

Author(s):

G. Kasavkar ◽

T. Blake ◽

N. Gullick

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Real World ◽

Certolizumab Pegol ◽

Tender Joint Count ◽

Inadequate Response ◽

Technology Appraisal ◽

New Onset

Background:Secukinumab was approved by NICE for patients with active Ankylosing Spondylitis and Psoriatic Arthritis in 2017. Clinical trial data suggests secukinumab is a useful treatment option in both conditions, but often real world experience differs greatly from clinical trial results. In addition, patients with more refractory disease are often excluded from clinical trials.Objectives:To assess the response to secukinumab in patients with seronegative spondyloarthropathy receiving treatment at University Hospital Coventry and WarwickshireMethods:Patients starting secukinumab at UHCW were identified from the Blueteq funding database. Medical notes were reviewed retrospectively to assess response rates using BASDAI responses in Ankylosing spondylitis and PsARC responses in PsA. Patients who had previously had inadequate response to TNF inhibitors (PsA only) and severe psoriasis received 300mg secukinumab monthly; the remainder were prescribed 150mg monthly.Results:146 patients commenced secukinumab between June 2017 and January 2020 and had outcome data recorded. 73 patients (50%) had received previous biologic agents prior to secukinumab exposure. Patients with Ankylosing spondylitis had high BASDAI (6.8±1.4) and spinal pain (7.5±1.4). 48 patients had an initial response to treatment as per outcome measures done before and after Secukinumab inception. Secukinumab was effective in 89 patients (94%), and 87 (91%) continued treatment.In psoriatic arthritis, despite high levels of activity at baseline (mean tender joint count 10±8; swollen joint count 6±3) and 65% prior biologic exposure; high rates of response were seen. The majority of patients have continued treatment. Secukinumab was well tolerated in both patient groups with low rates of discontinuation due to adverse events (8 patients, 5%). Adverse events included recurrent infection (3), rash (1), mouth ulcers (1), vertigo (1), new onset cancer (1) and new onset Crohn’s (1) although rates were low overall. Patients with pre-existing uveitis did not develop exacerbations but low numbers of patients with prior uveitis were treated.PsA (n=51)AS (n=95)Age in years, mean (SD)53 (13)49(12)Male sex, n (%)21 (41)62 (65)Disease duration in years, mean (SD)8 (8)10.9 (9.2)Previous biologic exposure, n (%)30 (65)43 (48)Number of prior biologics, median (range)1 (1-4)1 (1-4)Responder, n (%)37 (72)*89 (93)Discontinuation, n(%)12 (24)8 (8.5)Adverse events62Lack of efficacy64Other02*Response could not be assessed in 3/51 PsA patients due to insufficient clinical data; these patients have been recorded as non respondersConclusion:Secukinumab demonstrates high levels of efficacy even in a cohort of patients with longstanding PSA and AS with high rates of inadequate responses to other biologics.Secukinumab is well tolerated with low rates of discontinuation due to adverse events.References:Certolizumab pegol and secukinumab for treating active psoriatic arthritis after inadequate response to DMARDs Technology appraisal guidance [TA445]Secukinumab for active ankylosing spondylitis after treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or TNF-alpha inhibitors Technology appraisal guidance [TA407]Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text