In utero and early-life exposure of rats to a Wi-Fi signal: Screening of immune markers in sera and gestational outcome

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 410-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saliha Aït-Aïssa ◽  
Bernard Billaudel ◽  
Florence Poulletier de Gannes ◽  
Gilles Ruffié ◽  
Sébastien Duleu ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Sara A. Quandt ◽  
Dana C. Mora ◽  
Theresa L. Seering ◽  
Haiying Chen ◽  
Thomas A. Arcury ◽  
...  

(1) Background: Early life exposure to neurotoxic chemicals can have later impacts on child health. Most research designs must assume that current exposure is similar to past. Life history calendar methods can help to provide data on early life exposure. (2) Methods: Life history calendars were completed by mothers of 8-year-old children from Latinx farmworker and non-farmworker families (n = 73 and 65, respectively). Measures were created of months exposure through living adjacent to farm fields and having household members who worked in jobs exposing them to toxic chemicals. Data were divided into time periods of in utero, early childhood (birth-35 months) and later childhood (36–96 months). Cluster analysis compared the measures for children from farmworker and non-farmworker parents. (3) Results: Although, as a group, children from farmworker families have greater lifetime months of probable exposure to pesticides than children in non-farmworker families, cluster analysis reveals groups of children who do not follow that pattern. (4) Conclusions: The life history calendar is a technique for obtaining data on early life toxic chemical exposure that may help assign children to proper exposure groups. Conducting secondary analyses using such information can help to clarify the association of exposures to health outcomes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 2865
Author(s):  
Florence Guida ◽  
Karin Van Veldhoven ◽  
Gianluca Campanella ◽  
Paul Elliott ◽  
John Gulliver ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 183 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frolayne M. Carlos-Wallace ◽  
Luoping Zhang ◽  
Martyn T. Smith ◽  
Gabriella Rader ◽  
Craig Steinmaus

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah VanEvery ◽  
Wen‐hao Yang ◽  
Nancy Olsen ◽  
Xinyuan Zhang ◽  
Rong Shu ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Plusquin* ◽  
Florence Guida ◽  
Rossella Alfano ◽  
Gianluca Campanella ◽  
Paul Elliott ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 280-295
Author(s):  
Vasilina Yauseyenka ◽  
Vladimir Drozdovitch ◽  
Evgenia Ostroumova ◽  
Olga Polyanskaya ◽  
Victor Minenko ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (7) ◽  
pp. 1093-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ondine S. von Ehrenstein ◽  
Julia E. Heck ◽  
Andrew S. Park ◽  
Myles Cockburn ◽  
Loraine Escobedo ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 1077-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. H. Smith ◽  
M. Yunus ◽  
A. F. Khan ◽  
A. Ercumen ◽  
Y. Yuan ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad S Weldy ◽  
Yonggang Liu ◽  
Yu-Chi Chang ◽  
Ivan O Medvedev ◽  
Julie R Fox ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 128-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Simon

Evidence suggests that excise taxes on tobacco improve fetal health. However, it remains unknown if smoke exposure in early life causes lasting harm to children. I find that in utero exposure to a dollar increase in the state cigarette tax causes a 10 percent decrease in sick days from school and a 4.7 percent decrease in having two or more doctor visits. I present additional evidence for decreases in hospitalizations and asthma. This supports the hypothesis that exposure to cigarette smoke in utero and infancy carries significant medium-term costs, and that excise taxes can lead to lasting intergenerational improvements in well-being. (JEL H25, H71, I12, J13)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document