scholarly journals Clinicopathological features, survival outcomes, and appropriate surgical approaches for stage I acinar and papillary predominant lung adenocarcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3455-3462
Author(s):  
Di Lu ◽  
Jianjun Yang ◽  
Xiguang Liu ◽  
Siyang Feng ◽  
Xiaoying Dong ◽  
...  
Medicine ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 94 (42) ◽  
pp. e1784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Isaka ◽  
Tomoyuki Yokose ◽  
Hiroyuki Ito ◽  
Masashi Nagata ◽  
Hideyuki Furumoto ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 4103
Author(s):  
Chien-Hung Gow ◽  
Min-Shu Hsieh ◽  
Yi-Nan Liu ◽  
Yi-Hsuan Lee ◽  
Jin-Yuan Shih

Pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) has unique histological patterns. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the clinicopathological features, prognosis, and survival outcomes of IMAs. We retrospectively identified 77 patients with pulmonary IMA and reviewed their clinical and pathological features. Another 520 patients with non-IMA-type ADC were retrieved for comparison with patients with IMA. A new two-tier grading system (high-grade and low-grade IMAs) modified from the pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia classification system was used for survival analyses. Compared to patients with non-IMA-type ADC, patients with IMA tended to have never smoked (p = 0.01) and had early-stage IMA at initial diagnosis (p < 0.001). For stage I–II diseases, the five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 76% in IMAs and 50% in non-IMA-type ADCs, and a longer OS was observed in patients with IMA (p = 0.002). KRAS mutations were the most commonly detected driver mutations, which occurred in 12 of the 28 (43%) patients. High-grade IMAs were associated with a shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) for stage I–IIIA diseases (p = 0.010) than low-grade IMAs but not for OS. In conclusion, patients with stage I and II IMA had better OS than those with non-IMA-type ADC. A new two-tier grading system might be useful for predicting RFS in stage I–IIIA IMAs.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e038020
Author(s):  
Xiaopei Chao ◽  
Ming Wu ◽  
Shuiqing Ma ◽  
Xianjie Tan ◽  
Sen Zhong ◽  
...  

IntroductionRecent studies have revealed that the oncological survival outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) are inferior to those of abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in early-stage cervical cancer, but the potential reasons are unclear.Methods and analysisEach expert from 28 study centres participating in a previously reported randomised controlled trial (NCT03739944) will provide successive eligible records of at least 100 patients who accepted radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2015. Inclusion criteria consist of a definite pathological evaluation of stages IA1 (with positive lymphovascular space invasion), IA2 and IB1 according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system and a histological subtype of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma. The primary endpoint is 5-year disease-free survival between the MIRH and ARH groups. The secondary endpoints include the MIRH learning curves of participating surgeons, 5-year overall survival between the MIRH and ARH groups, survival outcomes according to surgical chronology, surgical outcomes and sites of recurrence and potential risk factors that affect survival outcomes. A subgroup analysis in patients with tumour diameter less than 2 cm will follow the similar flow diagram.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (registration no. JS-1711), and is also filed on record by all other 27 centres. The results will be disseminated through community events and peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03738969


2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1121-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Saijo ◽  
G. Sato ◽  
K. Usui ◽  
M. Sato ◽  
M. Sagawa ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1066-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo-Hsuan Hsu ◽  
Kun-Chieh Chen ◽  
Tsung-Ying Yang ◽  
Yi-Chen Yeh ◽  
Teh-Ying Chou ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 1655-1663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gouji Toyokawa ◽  
Yuichi Yamada ◽  
Tetsuzo Tagawa ◽  
Yuka Kozuma ◽  
Taichi Matsubara ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document