scholarly journals Real‐world evidence of tisagenlecleucel for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B‐cell lymphoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Iacoboni ◽  
Guillermo Villacampa ◽  
Nuria Martinez‐Cibrian ◽  
Rebeca Bailén ◽  
Lucia Lopez Corral ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Vodicka ◽  
K Benesova ◽  
A Janikova ◽  
V Prochazka ◽  
D Belada ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 301-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Thieblemont ◽  
S. Le Gouill ◽  
R. Di Blasi ◽  
G. Cartron ◽  
F. Morschhauser ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Fei Yang ◽  
Anup Abraham ◽  
Ju Zhang ◽  
Yan Xiao ◽  
Richard D. Hammer ◽  
...  

Background The distinction of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) into cell-of-origin (COO) subgroups (germinal center B-cell-like [GCB] or activated B-cell-like [ABC]) based on gene expression profiling is associated with prognosis and has potential therapeutic implications to mitigate the worse outcome for patients with DLBCL. Other phenotypic and molecular/cytogenetic features such as concurrent translocations of oncogene MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 (so-called double-/triple-hit lymphoma, DHL/THL) and coexpression of MYC and BCL2 proteins (so-called double-expressor lymphoma, DEL) are also recognized to have great prognostic impact (Swerdlow SH et al. Blood 2016;127(20):2375-2390). This study investigated the prevalence of COO, DHL/THL and DEL in a real-world cohort of patients with DLBCL who had documented results of diagnostic testing. Methods This study used the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database to abstract information on patients diagnosed with DLBCL between 2011-2019. Information on diagnostic testing from immunohistochemistry (IHC) for expression of MYC, BCL2, BCL6, CD10 or MUM1, and from fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or karyotype analysis for rearrangement of MYC, BCL2 or BCL6 was abstracted from pathology reports or clinical visit notes, where available. We calculated the proportions of COO subgroups (GCB vs. ABC) that were derived from IHC testing results according to Hans algorithm (Hans C et al., Blood 2004;103(1):275-282), DHL/THL, and DEL. We also examined concordance of COO classification derived from IHC testing results with that directly reported by the healthcare providers. Differences in patient characteristics between IHC testing results-derived COO subgroups (GCB vs. ABC) were assessed using chi-square tests. Results 4400 patients had documented results of IHC and 73% (n=3194) can be classified into either GCB or ABC DLBCL (GCB/ABC ratio of 1.38). 3205 patients had documented results of FISH or karyotype analysis and 8% (n=245) were DHL/THL; only 33 patients were DEL. Within the GCB DLBCL patients derived from IHC testing results (n=1854), 163 patients were DHL/THL and 11 were DEL, whereas 24 DHL/THL and 18 DEL were identified within the ABC type (n=1340). When comparing COO classification derived from IHC testing results (n=3194) with that directly reported by the healthcare providers (n=2765), additional 695 and 439 patients can be classified as GCB and ABC DLBCL by IHC, respectively (Table). Univariate analysis showed that patients who were non-White ethnic group, diagnosed in academic centers, with lower body mass index but elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels and worse ECOG performance status, and without transformation from a prior indolent lymphoid malignancy, were more likely to be associated with ABC DLBCL (for all variables, p<0.05). There were no clinically meaningful and/or statistically significant differences in IHC testing results-derived COO classification (GCB vs. ABC) by age, gender, year of DLBCL diagnosis, geographic location of residency, type of insurance plan, tumor group stage, documentation of extranodal site or any other primary cancer history at the time of diagnosis. Discussion In this large real-world DLBCL cohort, a lower-than-expected proportion of DEL patients were identified vs. the 20-35% reported in the literature (Karube K and Campo E. Hematology 2015;52(2):97-106). This is likely due to our cohort of patients requiring clear evidence of coexpression for MYC and BCL2 (≥40% and >50%, respectively) that are not related to underlying chromosomal rearrangements, and few pathologists reported levels of percent staining for IHC testing among those with documented positive results of MYC/BCL2 protein coexpression. In addition, results from this study showed that only half of cases had COO classification documented by healthcare providers, despite available IHC results. Although this study indicated lack of details in the reporting of diagnostic testing (e.g. COO identification, levels of percent staining, methods for DLBCL subgroup identification), findings should be interpreted with caution, as patients with DLBCL might have been tested but not documented in the electronic health record system or might have biomarker testing performed at sites outside of the Flatiron Health network. Disclosures Yang: F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. Zhang:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. Xiao:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. Hammer:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Caris Lifesciences: Honoraria; PER Med education: Honoraria; PathEdEx: Current equity holder in private company. Prime:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 132 (15) ◽  
pp. 1807-1814
Author(s):  
Peng Liu ◽  
Ying Han ◽  
Shi-Yu Jiang ◽  
Xiao-Hui He ◽  
Yan Qin ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 237-237
Author(s):  
Sacha Satram-Hoang ◽  
Sandra Skettino ◽  
Khang Hoang ◽  
Sridhar R Guduru ◽  
Ashok Gunuganti ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 237 Introduction: Prior real-world data show that a large proportion of the elderly population with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are not receiving the recommended therapy for their disease. Over half of the patients diagnosed with DLBCL are over the age of 60 and clinical trials show that patients over the age of 60 respond well to current guideline-based therapy. We set out to examine the patient characteristics associated with receiving recommended therapy and the survival outcomes in an older population in routine clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 9866 DLBCL patients in the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Patients were diagnosed between January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2007, were >66 years, and continuously enrolled in Medicare Part A and B with no HMO coverage in the year prior to diagnosis. Chi-square test for categorical variables and ANOVA or t-test for continuous variables were used to assess differences in patient and disease characteristics by treatment status. Logistic regression modeling assessed the patient characteristics predictive of not receiving treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression assessed survival by treatment type. Date of last follow-up was December 31, 2009. Results: There were 7832 (80%) patients who received treatment and 2034 (20%) who did not receive treatment during the study time period. Untreated patients were older at diagnosis with mean age of 81 compared to 76 years in treated patients (p<.0001). As age increased, the treatment rate significantly decreased especially among patients >80 years (Table 1). Untreated patients were also more likely non-white (15% vs. 12%; p<.01), diagnosed with stage IV disease (33% vs. 29%; p<.0001), had higher comorbidity burden, and lived in areas of lower socioeconomic status than treated patients (p<.0001). In the adjusted logistic regression model, increasing age, non-white race, higher comorbidity score, and lower income were predictive of not receiving treatment. The multivariate survival analysis, adjusting for age, sex, race, stage, histology, comorbidity, income, and year of diagnosis, demonstrated a 3-fold higher risk of death in the untreated patients (HR=2.98; 95%CI=2.81–3.16) compared to treated patients. Conclusions: This real-world analysis of elderly DLBCL patients confirmed that 20% of them are not receiving treatment, and the rate of under-treatment is even more pronounced among those >80 years. As a consequence, untreated patients had a 3-fold higher risk of death compared to those who received treatment. Disclosures: Satram-Hoang: Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy. Skettino:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Roche Stock Other. Reyes:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Roche Stock Other.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19050-e19050
Author(s):  
Xiaoqin Yang ◽  
François Laliberté ◽  
Guillaume Germain ◽  
Monika Kumar Raut ◽  
Mei Sheng Duh ◽  
...  

e19050 Background: PMBCL is a rare mature B-cell neoplasm (2-4% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas) for which there is only limited data on treatment patterns in clinical practice. In October 2015, PMBCL was differentiated from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with the advent of ICD-10-CM PMBCL-specific codes. This study aims to describe real-world treatment patterns among pts diagnosed with PMBCL in the US. Methods: A retrospective database analysis was conducted using the Optum Clinformatics DataMart database (01/2013-03/2018). Pts with a first PMBCL ICD-10-CM diagnosis (with or without an antecedent ICD-10-CM diagnosis of DLBCL/other lymphoma, which may have been assigned before PMBCL confirmation) after October 1st, 2015 (index date) and no ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for unspecified PMBCL/DLBCL, were identified as incident pts. Those with PMBCL ICD-10-CM and unspecified ICD-9-CM diagnosis for PMBCL/DLBCL before October 2015 (index date) were identified as prevalent pts. PMBCL diagnoses on ≥2 medical visits and ≥12 months of continuous enrollment pre-index date were required. An adapted algorithm developed from previously published studies was used to identify lines of therapy (LOT). Duration of therapy spanned from LOT initiation up to discontinuation of all agents in the LOT, a switch to another LOT, or the addition of a new agent. Results: Among 148 PMBCL pts (118 incident; 30 prevalent), median (interquartile range) age was 66 (42-77) years. In incident pts, 48.3% were treated with ≥1 LOT (mean ± standard deviation [SD] duration of therapy: 86.0 ± 69.8 days) and 14.4% were treated with ≥2 LOT. The most frequently used first-line (1L) therapy (54.4% of pts) was R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine). In prevalent pts, 63.3% were treated with ≥1 LOT (mean ± SD duration of therapy: 88.3 ± 44.6 days) and 20.0% were treated with ≥2 LOT. The most frequently used 1L therapy was R-CHOP (68.4%). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a large portion of pts require additional therapy after 1L treatment to manage PMBCL, underscoring the significant unmet need in this population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document