scholarly journals Predictive molecular pathology of lung cancer in Germany with focus on gene fusion testing: Methods and quality assurance

2020 ◽  
Vol 128 (9) ◽  
pp. 611-621
Author(s):  
Janna Siemanowski ◽  
Carina Heydt ◽  
Sabine Merkelbach‐Bruse
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen-Zhen Yin ◽  
Shou-Fang Qu ◽  
Chuan-Feng Huang ◽  
Fang Chen ◽  
Jian-Biao Li ◽  
...  

AbstractThalassemia is one of the most common autosomal recessive inherited diseases worldwide, and it is also highly prevalent and variable in Southern China. Various types of genetic testing technologies have been developed for diagnosis and screening of thalassemia. Characterized genomic DNA reference materials are necessary for assay development, validation, proficiency testing and quality assurance. However, there is no publicly available reference materials for thalassemia genetic testing as yet. To address the need for these materials, the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control and the China National Gene Bank established 31 new cell lines with 2 wild genotypes and 29 distinct genotypes of thalassemia which account for approximately 90% thalassemia carriers in China. The genomic DNA of 31 cell lines were characterized by four clinical genetic testing laboratories using different genetic testing methods and technology platforms. The genotyping results were concordant among four laboratories. In addition, the results of stability test demonstrated that the genotypes of these DNA samples were not influenced by preanalytical conditions such as long-term exposure to high temperature(37□) environment and repeated freeze-thawing. In conclusion, we developed the first national panel of 31 genomic DNA reference materials which are renewable and publicly available for the quality assurance of various genetic testing methods and will facilitate research and development in thalassemia genetic testing.


Author(s):  
Dereck Barr-Pulliam ◽  
Helen L Brown-Liburd ◽  
Kerri-Ann Sanderson

Audit data analytics (ADAs) allow auditors to analyze the entire population of transactions which has measurable benefits for audit quality. However, auditors caution that the level of assurance on the financial statements is not incrementally increased. We examine whether the testing methodology and the type of ICFR opinion issued affect jurors' perceptions of auditor negligence. We predict and find that when auditors issue an unqualified ICFR opinion, jurors make higher negligence assessments when auditors employ statistical sampling than when they employ ADAs. Further, when auditors issue an adverse ICFR opinion, jurors attribute less blame to auditors and more blame to the investor for an audit failure. Additionally, jurors perceive the use of ADAs as an indicator of higher audit quality and are less likely to find auditors negligent. However, jurors do not perceive a difference in the level of assurance provided when auditors use ADAs versus sampling testing methods.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 916-920
Author(s):  
Félix Blanc‐Durand ◽  
Raafat Alameddine ◽  
Anthony J. Iafrate ◽  
Danh Tran‐Thanh ◽  
Ying‐Chun Lo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document