Use of Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) for Measurement of Therapy Predictive Biomarkers in Patients with Cancer

Biomarkers that predict likely response or resistance to specific therapies are critical in personalising treatment for cancer patients. Such biomarkers are now available for an increasing number of anti-cancer therapies, especially targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The gold-standard method for determining predictive biomarkers requires tumour tissue. Obtaining tissue, however, is not always possible and even if possible, the amount or quality of tissue obtained may be inadequate for biomarker analysis. Tumour DNA, however, can be released into the bloodstream, giving rise to what is referred to as circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). In contrast to tissue, blood can be obtained from effectively all patients in a minimally invasive and safe manner. Other advantages of blood over tissue for biomarker testing include a shorter turn-around time and an ability to perform serial measurements. Furthermore, blood should provide a more complete profile of mutations present in heterogeneous tumours than a single-needle tissue biopsy. A limitation of blood vis-à-vis tissue, however, is lower sensitivity and, thus, the possibility of missing an actionable mutation. Despite this limitation, blood-based predictive biomarkers, such as mutant EGFR for predicting response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and mutant PIK3CA for predicting response to alpelisib in combination with fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer, may be used when tissue is unavailable. Although tissue remains the gold standard for detecting predictive biomarkers, it is likely that several further blood-based assays will soon be validated and used when tissue is unavailable or unsuitable for analysis.

Emerging a Novel VOPP1-EGFR Fusion Coexistent With T790M as an Acquired Resistance Mechanism to Prior Icotinib and Sensitive to Osimertinib in a Patient With EGFR L858R Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report

BackgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) fusions are rare genomic events in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical support and evidence to guide management are absent for NSCLC patients harboring EGFR fusion.Case PresentationIn this case report, we describe a 69-year-old female who received right lobectomy and was diagnosed with pathological stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR L858R. Twenty months later he had recurrent disease in the liver, lung, and bone, and was treated with icotinib. A novel vesicular overexpressed in cancer pro-survival protein 1 (VOPP1)-EGFR fusion gene coexistent with T790M were identified by next-generation sequencing using pericardial effusion and blood samples after icotinib treatment, which led to progression after icotinib six months and suggested a potential resistance mechanism. Subsequently, the patient was switched to osimertinib treatment, which resulted in a progression-free survival interval of more than 11 months.ConclusionsThe present results suggested that acquired VOPP1-EGFR fusion gene with T790M potentially serve an additional resistance mechanism to first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. And the present case increases the evidence supporting use of osimertinib for treatment of NSCLC patients harboring EGFR fusion.

First-line osimertinib in EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status

Background: The efficacy of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for patients with poor performance status (PS) remains unclear. Patients & methods: This multicenter retrospective study evaluated patients treated with osimertinib between 2018 and 2020, with PS 2–4. Results: Among 36 patients with PS 2, the median progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year PFS, median overall survival (OS) and 1-year OS were 14.5 months, 65.4%, 18.1 months and 72.7%, respectively. Among 20 patients with PS 3–4, the median PFS, 1-year PFS, median OS and 1-year OS were 3.0 months, 27.1%, 5.0 months and 46.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Osimertinib was not as efficacious as other EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.