The eating disorder examination: Norms and construct validity with young and middle adolescent girls

2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 551-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey D. Wade ◽  
Susan Byrne ◽  
Rachel Bryant-Waugh
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorder ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Adolescent Girls ◽  
Eating Disorder Examination

scholarly journals Assessing Negative Core Beliefs in Eating Disorders: Revision of the Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amaani H. Hatoum ◽  
Amy L Burton ◽  
Maree J Abbott
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Eating Disorder ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Core Beliefs ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Five Dimensions ◽  
Eating Disorder Examination ◽  
High Standards

Abstract Background: Increased theoretical and empirical attention has been given to examining the role of core beliefs in both the development and maintenance of eating disorders (EDs). The Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire (ED-CBQ) is self-report measure designed to assess five dimensions of core beliefs relating to eating disorders; self-loathing, unassertive/inhibited, demanding/needing help and support, abandoned/deprived, and high standards for the self. The present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the ED-CBQ and to develop a revised and improved version of the original measure, as necessary, after evaluating its factor structure and related properties.Methods: A sample of undergraduate university students (N = 763) completed an online test battery of questionnaires. Putative ED (n = 384) and non-ED (n = 379) subgroups were created from self-reported responses from the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDEQ). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were performed, and internal consistency, construct validity, group differences and clinical utility was examined. Results: An initial CFA did not support the original five-factor 40-item ED-CBQ. Two revised versions were developed that both possessed equal or superior psychometric properties to the original 40-item measure. The ED-CBQ-SF and ED-CBQ-R both demonstrated superior model fit, similar levels of reliability and construct validity, and the ability to discriminate between putative ED diagnostic groups.Conclusions: Our results suggest that the ED-CBQ-SF and ED-CBQ-R are both valid, reliable, but more importantly efficient and accessible measures with the potential to be utilised both clinically and in research settings.

Eating Disorder Examination

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zafra Cooper ◽  
Christopher Fairburn
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorder ◽  
Eating Disorder Examination

Ascertaining an efficient eligibility cut-off for extended Medicare items for eating disorders

2021 ◽  
pp. 103985622110286
Author(s):  
Tracey Wade ◽  
Jamie-Lee Pennesi ◽  
Yuan Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Eating Disorder ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Rate Sensitivity ◽  
True Positive Rate ◽  
Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire ◽  
Eating Disorder Examination ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
The Relationship

Objective: Currently eligibility for expanded Medicare items for eating disorders (excluding anorexia nervosa) require a score ⩾ 3 on the 22-item Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). We compared these EDE-Q “cases” with continuous scores on a validated 7-item version of the EDE-Q (EDE-Q7) to identify an EDE-Q7 cut-off commensurate to 3 on the EDE-Q. Methods: We utilised EDE-Q scores of female university students ( N = 337) at risk of developing an eating disorder. We used a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the relationship between the true-positive rate (sensitivity) and the false-positive rate (1-specificity) of cases ⩾ 3. Results: The area under the curve showed outstanding discrimination of 0.94 (95% CI: .92–.97). We examined two specific cut-off points on the EDE-Q7, which included 100% and 87% of true cases, respectively. Conclusion: Given the EDE-Q cut-off for Medicare is used in conjunction with other criteria, we suggest using the more permissive EDE-Q7 cut-off (⩾2.5) to replace use of the EDE-Q cut-off (⩾3) in eligibility assessments.

scholarly journals Third-wave interventions for eating disorders in adolescence – systematic review with meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne Buerger ◽  
Timo D. Vloet ◽  
Lisa Haber ◽  
Julia M. Geissler
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorder ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Third Wave ◽  
Eating Disorder Inventory ◽  
Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Qualitative Synthesis ◽  
Eating Disorder Examination

Abstract Context Third-wave therapies have demonstrated efficacy as a treatment option for EDs in adulthood. Data on the suitability for EDs in adolescence are lacking. Objective To estimate the efficacy of third-wave interventions to reduce ED symptoms in adolescents in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and uncontrolled studies. Data sources We systematically reviewed the databases PubMed (1976-January 2021), PsycINFO (1943-January 2021), and the Cochrane database (1995-January 2021) for English-language articles on third-wave therapies. References were screened for further publications of interest. Study selection RCTs and pre-post studies without control group, comprising patients aged 11–21 years (mean age = 15.6 years) with an ED diagnosis (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, eating disorder not otherwise specified) investigating the efficacy of third-wave psychological interventions were included. Efficacy had to be evaluated according to the Eating Disorder Examination or Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, the Eating Disorder Inventory-2, the Eating Disorder Inventory-3, or the Structured Interview for Anorexic and Bulimic Disorders for DSM-IV and ICD-10. The outcome assessed in the meta-analysis was the EDE total score. Data extraction Independent extraction of data by two authors according to a pre-specified data extraction sheet and quality indicators. Data synthesis We identified 1000 studies after removal of duplicates, assessed the full texts of 48 articles for eligibility, and included 12 studies with a total of 487 participants (female 97.3%/male 2.6%) in the qualitative synthesis and seven studies in the meta-analysis. Articles predominantly reported uncontrolled pre-post trials of low quality, with only two published RCTs. Treatments focused strongly on dialectical behaviour therapy (n = 11). We found moderate effects of third-wave therapies on EDE total score interview/questionnaire for all EDs (d = − 0.67; z = − 5.53; CI95% = − 0.83 to − 0.59). Descriptively, the effects appeared to be stronger in patients with BN and BED. Conclusion At this stage, it is not feasible to draw conclusions regarding the efficacy of third-wave interventions for the treatment of EDs in adolescence due to the low quality of the empirical evidence. Since almost all of the identified studies used DBT, it is unfortunately not possible to assess other third-wave treatments’ efficacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document