scholarly journals Self-reported health and quality of life outcomes of heart failure patients in the aftermath of a national economic crisis: a cross-sectional study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audur Ketilsdottir ◽  
Brynja Ingadottir ◽  
Tiny Jaarsma
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Silveira Faria ◽  
Ligia Neres Matos ◽  
Liana Amorim Correa Trotte ◽  
Helena Cramer Veiga Rey ◽  
Tereza Cristina Felippe Guimarães

ABSTRACT Objective: to verify the association between the prognostic scores and the quality of life of candidates for heart transplantation. Method: a descriptive cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 32 outpatients applying to heart transplantation. The prognosis was rated by the Heart Failure Survival Score (HFSS) and the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM); and the quality of life by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). The Pearson correlation test was applied. Results: the correlations found between general quality of life scores and prognostic scores were (HFSS/MLHFQ r = 0.21), (SHFM/MLHFQ r = 0.09), (HFSS/KCCQ r = -0.02), (SHFM/KCCQ r = -0.20). Conclusion: the weak correlation between the prognostic and quality of life scores suggests a lack of association between the measures, i.e., worse prognosis does not mean worse quality of life and the same statement is true in the opposite direction.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. e0231346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brita Roy ◽  
Judith R. L. M. Wolf ◽  
Michelle D. Carlson ◽  
Reinier Akkermans ◽  
Bradley Bart ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 693-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis García-Olmos ◽  
Maurice Batlle ◽  
Rio Aguilar ◽  
Carlos Porro ◽  
Montse Carmona ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although both hospitalization and mortality due to heart failure (HF) have been widely studied, less is known about the impact of HF on disability and quality of life. Aim To assess the degree of disability and quality of life in HF patients attended at family medicine centres. Design and setting Cross-sectional study of a cohort of HF patients attended at family medicine centres. Methods Disability was assessed with the WHODAS 2 questionnaire, which provides a global and six domain scores that is understanding and communication, getting around, self-care, getting along with people, life activities and participation in society. Quality of life was assessed with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, which furnishes a global and two domain scores, physical and emotional. Results A breakdown of the results showed that 28% of patients had moderate disability and 16.7% had severe disability, with the most important areas affected being: life activities, 8.9% extreme disability and 30.3% severe disability; getting around, 34.6% severe disability and 2% extreme disability; and participation in society, 53.3% moderate-severe disability. Quality of life was mildly affected. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification and sex were the major determinants of disability and quality of life. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists were associated with better scores in the “getting around” and “life activity” domains. Conclusion HF patients in primary care show an important degree of disability and an acceptable quality of life.


2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (9) ◽  
pp. 2037-2046
Author(s):  
Yannis Dimitroglou ◽  
Fotios Anagnostopoulos ◽  
Constantina Aggeli ◽  
Sophia Delicou ◽  
Aikaterini Xydaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document