Tourmaline as a recorder of magmatic-hydrothermal evolution: In-situ elements and boron isotope analysis of tourmaline from the Qinghe pegmatite, NW China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beiqi Zheng ◽  
Bin Chen ◽  
Chao Huang
2009 ◽  
Vol 260 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 138-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone A. Kasemann ◽  
Daniela N. Schmidt ◽  
Jelle Bijma ◽  
Gavin L. Foster

Crystals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1363
Author(s):  
Beiqi Zheng ◽  
Meihua Chen

Few studies have focused on gem-quality tourmaline acting as a petrogenetic recorder, and the colour genesis of pink elbaite is still controversial. We carry out in situ major, trace element and boron isotope composition analyses on a single tourmaline crystal. This crystal is characterized by sudden transformation from colourless to pink, which can represent full pegmatite magma evolution. According to the analysis results, all spots are divided into alkali groups according to X-site occupancy and subdivided into elbaite series. The pink part accommodates higher concentrations of volatile and incompatible elements. The result is most consistent with successive pegmatite evolution in which the colourless part crystallized from the early stage, while the pink part crystallized from the late stage. The relatively consistent δ11B value between the colourless and the pink part suggests no fluid exsolution occurred during pegmatite evolution. The slight increase of δ11B values within the pink part and the colourless part may be due to mica crystallization. The combination of (Li++Mn2+) (Al3++Xvac)-1 and the exclusive positive linear relationship of Mn2+ vs. Ti4+ indicate that Mn2+ is the main cause of pink, while Mn2+-Ti4+ intervalence charge transfer also plays an important role.


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. Short ◽  
Gottfried P. Kibelka ◽  
Robert H. Byrne ◽  
David Hollander

2011 ◽  
Vol 286 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 32-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Fisher ◽  
John M. Hanchar ◽  
Scott D. Samson ◽  
Bruno Dhuime ◽  
Janne Blichert-Toft ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Müller ◽  
Robert Anczkiewicz

Accurate in situ Sr isotope analysis of (bio)apatite via ‘robust-plasma’ laser-ablation MC-ICPMS with negligible 40Ca31P16O and reliable 87Rb interference correction.


2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (29) ◽  
pp. 3305-3311 ◽  
Author(s):  
KeJun Hou ◽  
YanHe Li ◽  
YingKai Xiao ◽  
Feng Liu ◽  
YouRong Tian

Author(s):  
Carrie C. Wright ◽  
Kathleen M. Wooton ◽  
Katheryn C. Twiss ◽  
Elizabeth T. Newman ◽  
E. Troy Rasbury

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
He-Dong Zhao ◽  
Kui-Dong Zhao ◽  
Martin R. Palmer ◽  
Shao-Yong Jiang ◽  
Wei Chen

Abstract Owing to the superimposition of water-rock interaction and external fluids, magmatic source signatures of ore-forming fluids for vein-type tin deposits are commonly overprinted. Hence, there is uncertainty regarding the involvement of magmatic fluids in mineralization processes within these deposits. Tourmaline is a common gangue mineral in Sn deposits and can crystallize from both the magmas and the hydrothermal fluids. We have therefore undertaken an in situ major, trace element, and B isotope study of tourmaline from the Yidong Sn deposit in South China to study the transition from late magmatic to hydrothermal mineralization. Six tourmaline types were identified: (1) early tourmaline (Tur-OE) and (2) late tourmaline (Tur-OL) in tourmaline-quartz orbicules from the Pingying granite, (3) early tourmaline (Tur-DE) and (4) late tourmaline (Tur-DL) in tourmaline-quartz dikelets in the granite, and (5 and 6) core (Tur-OC) and rim (Tur-OR), respectively of hydrothermal tourmaline from the Sn ores. Most of the tourmaline types belong to the alkali group and the schorl-dravite solid-solution series, but the different generations of magmatic and hydrothermal tourmaline are geochemically distinct. Key differences include the hundredfold enrichment of Sn in hydrothermal tourmaline compared to magmatic tourmaline, which indicates that hydrothermal fluids exsolving from the magma were highly enriched in Sn. Tourmaline from the Sn ores is enriched in Fe3+ compared to the hydrothermal tourmaline from the granite and displays trends of decreasing Al and increasing Fe content from core to rim, relating to the exchange vector Fe3+Al–1. This reflects oxidation of fluids during the interaction between hydrothermal fluids and the mafic-ultramafic wall rocks, which led to precipitation of cassiterite. The hydrothermal tourmaline has slightly higher δ11B values than the magmatic tourmaline (which reflects the metasedimentary source for the granite), but overall, the tourmaline from the ores has δ11B values similar to those from the granite, implying a magmatic origin for the ore-forming fluids. We identify five stages in the magmatic-hydrothermal evolution of the system that led to formation of the Sn ores in the Yidong deposit based on chemical and boron isotope changes of tourmaline: (1) emplacement of a B-rich, S-type granitic magma, (2) separation of an immiscible B-rich melt, (3) exsolution of an Sn-rich, reduced hydrothermal fluid, (4) migration of fluid into the country rocks, and (5) acid-consuming reactions with the surrounding mafic-ultramafic rocks and oxidation of the fluid, leading to cassiterite precipitation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document