scholarly journals A novel low‐grade nasopharyngeal adenocarcinoma characterized by a GOLGB1‐BRAF fusion gene

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-53
Author(s):  
Justin Bubola ◽  
Cristina R. Antonescu ◽  
Ilan Weinreb ◽  
David Swanson ◽  
John R. De Almeida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Hala Taha ◽  
Maha Yehia ◽  
Madeha Mahmoud ◽  
Mohamed El‐Beltagy ◽  
Myret Ghabriel ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Rampazzo Cruz ◽  
Indhira Dias Oliveira ◽  
Laís Moraes ◽  
Mário Del Giudice Paniago ◽  
Maria Teresa de Seixas Alves ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 68 (21) ◽  
pp. 8673-8677 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T.W. Jones ◽  
Sylvia Kocialkowski ◽  
Lu Liu ◽  
Danita M. Pearson ◽  
L. Magnus Bäcklund ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii369-iii369
Author(s):  
Diren Usta ◽  
Romain Sigaud ◽  
Juliane L Buhl ◽  
Florian Selt ◽  
Viktoria Marquardt ◽  
...  

Abstract Pilocytic astrocytomas (PAs) and other pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) exhibit aberrant activation of the MAPK signaling pathway caused by genetic alterations, most commonly KIAA1549:BRAF fusions, BRAF V600E and NF1 mutations. In such a single-pathway disease, novel drugs targeting the MAPK pathway (MAPKi) are prime candidates for treatment. We developed an assay suitable for pre-clinical testing of MAPKi in pLGGs, aiming at the identification of novel MAPK pathway suppressing synergistic drug combinations. We generated a reporter plasmid (pDIPZ) expressing destabilized firefly luciferase driven by a MAPK-responsive ELK-1-binding element, packaged in a lentiviral vector system. We stably transfected pediatric glioma cell lines with a BRAF fusion (DKFZ-BT66) and a BRAFV600E mutation (BT-40) background, respectively. Measurement of MAPK pathway activity was performed using the luciferase reporter. pERK protein levels were detected for validation. We performed a screen of a MAPKi library and calculated Combination Indices of selected combinations. The MAPKi library screen revealed MEK inhibitors as the class inhibiting the pathway with the lowest IC50s, followed by ERK and second generation RAF inhibitors. Synergistic effects in both BRAF-fusion and BRAFV600E mutation backgrounds were observed following combination treatments with different MAPKi classes (RAFi/MEKi, > RAFi/ERKi > MEKi/ERKi). We have generated a novel reporter assay for medium- to high-throughput pre-clinical drug testing of MAPKi in pLGG cell lines. MEK, ERK and next-generation RAF inhibitors were confirmed as potential treatment approaches for KIAA1549:BRAF and BRAFV600E mutated pLGGs. Synergistic suppression of MAPK pathway activity upon combination treatments was revealed using our assay in addition.


2006 ◽  
Vol 130 (9) ◽  
pp. 1358-1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen E. Vernon ◽  
Pablo A. Bejarano

Abstract Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcomas are uncommon deep soft tissue neoplasms first described by Evans in 1987. They exhibit a deceptively benign appearance, with a whorled or linear arrangement of spindle-shaped cells showing few to absent mitoses. A characteristic, but not specific, feature is the presence of areas of myxoid stroma. Recurrences are common, and late metastases have been recorded. A closely related but morphologically distinct tumor, the so-called hyalinizing spindle cell tumor with giant rosettes, has also been described; both neoplasms share the same cytogenetic abnormality, a balanced translocation resulting in a FUS/CREB3L2 fusion gene. Because of similar clinical behavior and the common cytogenetic abnormality, some authors prefer to consider both lesions as a single entity within the spectrum of low-grade sarcomas.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii371-iii371
Author(s):  
Andge Valiakhmetova ◽  
Ludmila Papusha ◽  
Ludmila Yasko ◽  
Alexander Druy ◽  
Alexander Karachunsky ◽  
...  

Abstract Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor (DLGNT) is an extremely rare disease, newly recognized in the 2016 WHO classification of tumors of the CNS. Most DLGNTs are low-grade neuroepithelial tumors with variable elements of neuronal/neurocytic and glial differentiation, have diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement on MRI, and typically harbor KIAA1549-BRAF fusions. Other alterations, such as the BRAF V600E substitution, are less common. Here, we present three cases of DLGNT with different presentations and outcomes. The first patient is a 2yr-old male with KIAA1549-BRAF fusion, and was treated with Carbo/VCR chemotherapy after a biopsy, with resultant ongoing stable disease for 3.5 years. The second patient, an 8yr-old male had the BRAF V600E point mutation and was treated with conventional chemotherapy (VCR/carboplatin). On progression, he received the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib, achieving a complete response which last 14 month. The third patient, a 27 month old male, harbored a KIAA1549-BRAF fusion and was treated at diagnosis with the MEK inhibitor trametinib. The tumor has been radiographically stable in the context of clinical improvement for 21 months since the treatment initiation, ongoing 24 month. In summary, we present further evidence of MAPK pathway alterations in children with DLGNT. We describe a range of molecular presentations and clinical outcomes, including one patient treated with conventional chemotherapy with further stabilization of disease during 3.5 years and two patients who were successfully treated with targeted therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-55
Author(s):  
A. F. Valiakhmetova ◽  
L. I. Papusha ◽  
A. V. Artemov ◽  
G. V. Tereshchenko ◽  
E. A. Sal’nikova ◽  
...  

Background. Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor (DLGNT) is an extremely rare entity first officially recognized in 2016 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of this tumor usually visualizes diffuse meningeal infiltration with contrast enhancement, with the presence of multiple small contrast‑negative cysts, visible mainly in the T2 images. The main molecular markers of DLGNTs include the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion gene, BRAF V600E substitution is less common.The aim of this work is to describe the manifestation of DLGNT, its neuroimaging and molecular genetic characteristics, the experience of using anti‑BRAF and anti‑MEK therapy.Materials and methods. In this article are described four cases of DLGNT. The first patient with the presence of the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion in the tumor tissue received a full course of SIOP‑LGG / 2004 chemotherapy (carbo‑ platin and vincristine), the stabilization of the disease on the MRI remains for 4 years after completion of treatment. Second patient with KIAA1549-BRAF fusion gene in tumour tissue received MEK inhibitor trametinib as first line of treatment with the stabilization of the disease on control MRI which last for 2 years. A third patient with a mutation in the BRAF V600E gene. After disease progression on standard chemotherapy (carboplatin and vincristine) according to the SIOP‑LGG / 2004 protocol, anti‑BRAF therapy with vemurafenib was prescribed. After 10 months on MRI a complete response was recorded, which persists during the drug intake for 2.5 years. In the fourth patient, no molecular genetic aberrations were detected; a refractory / progressive course of the dis‑ ease was noted. To date, the stabilization of the disease is recorded on the fourth line of chemotherapy (everoli‑ mus and temozolomide).Conclusion. Given the rarity of this tumor and the lack of consensus about therapy, despite the limited number of observations, our experience allows us to recommend molecular testing of DLGNT to detect activating events in the BRAF gene, as well as consideration of anti‑BRAF / MEK therapy if either the BRAF V600E mutation is de‑ tected or KIAA1549-BRAF fusion.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. e0220146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Yamashita ◽  
Hideo Takeshima ◽  
Fumitaka Matsumoto ◽  
Kouji Yamasaki ◽  
Tsuyoshi Fukushima ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i35-i35
Author(s):  
T L Ku Dennis ◽  
Anthony P Y Liu ◽  
Eric Fu ◽  
Chung-Wing Luk ◽  
Jeffrey P W Yau ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Low grade glioma (LGG) is the most common central nervous system (CNS) tumor in children. Some are treated with surgery alone, while chemotherapy is given for unresectable tumor with clinical symptoms or progression. Conventional chemotherapy is effective but 30–40% patients may have reactivation of disease requiring re-treatment throughout lifetime. MEK inhibitor for BRAF-fusion positive LGG is a new treatment option for refractory cases. Methods Retrospective search in territory-wide pediatric oncology registry for children diagnosed with LGG from 2010–2020 in Hong Kong. To identify patients with molecular confirmed BRAF-fusion positive LGG and any treatment with MEK inhibitor. Results Twelve patients (N=12) were identified with BRAF-fusion positive LGG, male:female was 1:2, age 0.3–15.1yr (median 5.0yr) at presentation. The median follow up duration was 1.8yr. Five patients (42%) had surgical resection only. Seven patients (58%) were given chemotherapy with Carboplatin / Vincristine. Five out of seven (n=7) treated patients (71%) have partial response at their initial treatment. Two patients (29%) had progressive disease during treatment and switched to second-line chemotherapy, vinblastine however without improvement. Three patients required re-treatment as disease reactivation. Total five patients had refractory diseases were treated with MEK inhibitor, Trametinib including one diagnosed NF-1. All of them have adverse skin reaction and raised transaminase with one required dose reduction. They have been taking the MEK inhibitor for 0.1–3.3 yr with sustainable partial response. Conclusion Pediatric LGG has overall favourable prognosis. Some of them treated with surgery alone while conventional chemotherapy could also achieve satisfactory disease control. For refractory disease with BRAF-fusion positive, MEK inhibitor is a well tolerated treatment option showing sustainable partial response. However, prolonged medication and disturbing skin reaction are still a major concern for this group of patients. On-going clinical trials to compare conventional chemotherapy versus MEK inhibitor could give us more insight about the clinical benefit, patient selection and treatment duration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document