SAFETY AND RESPONSE AFTER 2 CYCLES OF BRENTUXIMAB VEDOTIN SUBSTITUTING VINCRISTINE IN THE OEPA/COPDAC REGIMEN FOR HIGH RISK PEDIATRIC HODGKIN LYMPHOMA (HL)

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 55-56
Author(s):  
M. Metzger ◽  
C. Mauz-Körholz ◽  
J. Flerlage ◽  
J. Bartelt ◽  
A. Billett ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Metzger ◽  
Michael P. Link ◽  
Amy L. Billett ◽  
Jamie Flerlage ◽  
John T. Lucas Jr. ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10532-10532
Author(s):  
Jessica Hochberg ◽  
Liana Klejmont ◽  
Lauren Harrison ◽  
Allyson Flower ◽  
Quihu Shi ◽  
...  

10532 Background: Cure rates for CAYA patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma remain high, however are limited by significant toxicity of chemoradiotherapy. Brentuximab Vedotin and Rituximab have shown efficacy in relapsed HL. We hypothesize that the addition of both to combination chemotherapy will be safe in newly diagnosed HL preserving current EFS with elimination of more toxic chemoradiotherapy. Objective: To evaluate the safety and overall response and EFS of Brentuximab and Rituximab in combination with risk adapted chemotherapy in CAYA with newly diagnosed HL. Methods: Age 1-30 yrs with newly diagnosed classical HL given 3 to 6 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy: Brentuximab vedotin with Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone and Darcarbazine (Bv-AVPD) for Low risk patients or Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, Darcarbazine and Rituximab (Bv-AVD-R) for Intermediate/High risk. Early response measured by PET/CT scan following 2 cycles. Slow responders received an additional 2 cycles of Bv-AVD-R for Intermediate Risk or Ifosfamide/Vinorelbine for High Risk patients. Radiation therapy was given ONLY to those patients not in CR. Results: Total = 19 patients. Median age = 15yr (range 4-23yr). Risk = 2 low, 13 intermediate, 4 high. Toxcity = 1 episode of GrIII mucositis, 1 episode of GrIII infusion reaction to Brentuximab. 17 patients have completed therapy. All 17 patients achieved a complete response to therapy for a CR = 100%. Eleven (58%) have achieved a rapid early response. No patient has required radiation therapy. For 17 patients who have completed therapy, the EFS and OS is 100% with a median follow up time of 915 days (30 months). Conclusions: The addition of Brentuximab vedotin and Rituximab to combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Hodgkin Lymphoma appears to be safe. Our early results show significant promise with a CR rate of 100% and 58% rapid early response. We have successfully deleted toxic alkylator, topoisomerase inhibitor, bleomycin and radiation from this treatment regimen. The EFS/OS to date is 100% with a median follow up time of 2.5 years. Further follow up and a larger cohort is needed to determine long term outcomes of this approach. Clinical trial information: NCT02398240.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4361-4361
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Tsirigotis ◽  
Ronit Yerushalmi ◽  
Kostantinos Gkirkas ◽  
Noga Shentov ◽  
Ivetta Danylesko ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) has recently received approval for treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) relapse after auto-SCT. Although BV is very effective in treating relapse of HL post auto-SCT, response is usually transient. In contrast, there is a paucity of data regarding the efficacy and safety of BV, combined or not with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), for the treatment of relapse occurring after allo-SCT. Methods Search for patients (pts) with relapsed HL post allo-SCT was performed in our transplant data set with the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BV in combination with DLI for the treatment of relapsing HL post allo-SCT. Eight pts with relapsed HL after allo-SCT that were treated with BV were included in this report. Results Patients and treatment: There were 6 males and 2 females, with a median age of 31 years (range, 23 - 40), who had previously failed an auto-SCT. Five pts had previously received BV after auto-SCT and all but one responded to treatment. All pts had chemosensitive disease before allo-SCT and were transplanted in a state of partial remission (PR). The graft source was unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cells from a matched related or an unrelated donor in 5 and 2 pts, respectively, while 1 pt received a double umbilical cord blood graft (DUCB). Five pts achieved complete remission (CR) and one PR after allo-SCT, while 2 pts had progressive disease (PD). Disease progression occurred in a median of 11 months (range, 4 - 17) after allo-SCT. All pts received BV at a dose of 1.8mg/kg every 3 weeks for a maximum of 16 doses, till disease progression or toxicity. In two pts chemotherapy was administered before BV. A median of 4.5 (range, 3 -12) BV cycles was administered. DLI was co-administered in 5 out of 7 pts (excluding one patient who received DUCB). Decision for DLI was at the discretion of the treating physician. One pt received 4 DLIs at escalating doses (5x106, 107, 5x107, 108/kg), while another one received 2 escalating DLIs (107, 108/kg) at 3 months interval. Three pts received a single DLI (107/kg). Treatment outcome: Three and two pts achieved CR and PR respectively after treatment with BV in combination with DLI. None of the pts treated only with BV responded. Four out of 5 pts developed GVHD (3 chronic, 1 acute) post DLI administration, that resolved in all cases after a short course of low dose steroids. Disease progression was observed in 3 out of 5 responders in 4, 7 and 9 months, while 2 pts remain progression free with a median follow up of 14,5 (range, 4 - 22) months. Six out of 8 pts are alive, while 2 pts died from HL. BV/DLI treatment was well tolerated and no serious adverse effects were observed in any of the patients. Conclusions In our study, we observed that administration of BV with DLI for HL relapsing post allo-SCT in pts with prior failure to auto-SCT was effective while toxicity was minimal. Notably, re-administration of BV to pts previously treated for post auto-SCT relapse did not result in additional toxicity or resistance. Furthermore, BV combined with DLI, but not BV alone, yielded anti-tumor response in 5/7 of these very high risk pts suggesting a possible synergistic effect. Of notice is the observation that one pt who was refractory to BV post auto-SCT, had a PR after re-administration of BV post allo-SCT. Our observations are in accordance with the results of a previous report, showing that BV plus DLI after allo-SCT creates a vaccination like-effect against HL [1]. Finally, in our study we observed lower than expected frequency of GVHD post DLI that was of transient duration and easily manageable with low dose steroids. We assume that this may be due to an immune-modulating effect produced by BV. Indeed previous studies have shown that CD30 is expressed on the surface of activated T-cells present in inflammatory infiltrates of GVHD lesions [2]. Administration of BV plus DLI should be tested in larger group of patients at high risk of relapse after allo-SCT. References Theurich S, Malcher J, Wennhold K, et al. Brentuximab Vedotin Combined With Donor Lymphocyte Infusions for Early Relapse of Hodgkin Lymphoma After Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation Induces Tumor-Specific Immunity and Sustained Clinical Remission. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 59-63. Chen Y, McDonough S, Hasserjian R, et al. Expression of CD30 in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2012; 120: 691-696. Disclosures Tsirigotis: CELLTRION, Inc.: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Fulvio Massaro ◽  
Nathalie Meuleman ◽  
Dominique Bron ◽  
Marie Maerevoet

Background:The standard treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients presenting a relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease is salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, with commonly used chemotherapy combinations (such as DHAP, ICE, BEGEV), 25-30% of these patients fail to achieve a complete metabolic response (CMR) and to proceed to ASCT, with subsequently poor outcomes. Single agents brentuximab vedotin (BV) and pembrolizumab have shown efficacy in heavily pretreated HL patients, as reported in previous studies. The combination of BV with nivolumab has been explored in a phase 1/2 study as first salvage treatment for HL patients, showing a CR rate of 61% (Herrera et al 2018). We explored the outcome of BV and pembrolizumab combination as salvage treatment in a series of R/R HL patients. Methods:We retrospectively collected data of seven HL patients presenting with a high-risk multi-refractory disease (two or more prior treatments) followed at Jules Bordet Institute between May 2019 and July 2020 and treated with a combination of BV and pembrolizumab. Patients were covered by special insurance conditions allowing treatment reimbursement. Treatment proposal was approved by a local multidisciplinary committee. Treatment consisted of 3-week cycles with a combination of BV (1.8 mg/kg IV) and pembrolizumab (200 mg IV fixed dose), an early PET-CT evaluation followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT consolidation for those achieving a Deauville score ≤4. After ASCT, patients received BV as maintenance for a total of 16 administration (including pre-ASCT cycles). Results:We included 7 patients, 6 male and 1 female, with a mean age of 27.4 (20.6-36.3) years. All patients presented with an advanced-stage disease, with a mean number of 2.56 (2-3) prior treatments. The median follow-up time was 9.7 months, while the average number of received cycles of treatment was 4.2 (range 2-7). Table 1 shows additional patients' characteristics. The overall response rate (ORR) was 87% and particularly a CR was achieved in five patients (72%), with a median time to response of two cycles. One partial response and one disease progression were also observed. Six patients proceeded to ASCT (86%) and subsequent BV maintenance, with one early disease progression. One patient, in complete molecular remission after 2 cycles, locally progressed after 6 cycles and received radiotherapy before ASCT. Table 2 summarizes the outcome for each patient included in the series. Conclusions:The BV and pembrolizumab combination is a very effective bridge treatment to ASCT for high-risk R/R HL patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document