Evaluation of Occipital Nerve Blocks for Acute Pain Relief of Migraines

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 378-383
Author(s):  
Alex M. Ebied ◽  
Duong T. Nguyen ◽  
Tanaka Dang
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Occipital Nerve

Acute pain management in trauma: anatomy, ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks and special considerations

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodosios Saranteas ◽  
Iosifina Koliantzaki ◽  
Olga Savvidou ◽  
Marina Tsoumpa ◽  
Georgia Eustathiou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Acute Pain Management ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Blocks

Nerve blocks enable adequate pain relief during topical photodynamic therapy of field cancerization on the forehead and scalp

2009 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. 795-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.B. Halldin ◽  
J. Paoli ◽  
C. Sandberg ◽  
H. Gonzalez ◽  
A.-M. Wennberg
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Field Cancerization ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Adequate Pain Relief

scholarly journals POST-OPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERY

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (03) ◽  
pp. 340-345
Author(s):  
ROBINA FIRDOUS
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Opioid Receptors ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Alternate Route ◽  
Parenteral Route ◽  
Group I ◽  
Post Operative Pain

The severity of post-operative pain and the lack of efforts in relievingit have led to the involvement of Anaesthesiologists in the management of post-operative and acute pain. Parenteralopiates have been utilized for post-operative pain management. The identification of the opioid receptors on substantiagelatinosa has provided an alternate route i.e 1 the epidural route - for administering opiates. Objectives: To evaluateand compare the efficacy and side effects of parenteral Buprenorphine with those of Extradural Buprenorphine.Setting: Department of Anaesthesia, District Headquarter Hospital, Faisalabad. Period: The data was collected duringthe last three and a half years. Materials and Methods: Sixty adult patients of either sex and ages ranging from 35-45years, who underwent lower abdominal surgery, were randomly selected for the study. They were equally divided intotwo groups. Group I patients were administered Buprenorphine 0.3 mg through the epidural catheter in extraduralspace. Group II patients were given Buprenorphine 0.3 mg intramuscularly. Results: Buprenorphine through theepidural route gives better analgesia with fewer side effects as compared with the parenteral route.

scholarly journals Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Blocks in Managing Chronic Facet Joint Pain: One-Year Follow-up of a Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial: Clinical Trial NCT00355914

2008 ◽  
Vol 2;11 (3;2) ◽  
pp. 121-132
Author(s):  
Laxmaiah Manchikanti
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Lumbar Facet Joint ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Lumbar Facet

Background: Lumbar facet joints have been implicated as the source of chronic pain in 15% to 45% of patients with chronic low back pain. Various therapeutic techniques including intraarticular injections, medial branch blocks, and radiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar facet joint nerves have been described in the alleviation of chronic low back pain of facet joint origin. Objective: The study was conducted to determine the clinical effectiveness of therapeutic local anesthetic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with or without steroid in managing chronic function-limiting low back pain of facet joint origin. Design: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Setting: An interventional pain management setting in the United States. Methods: This study included 60 patients in Group I with local anesthetic and 60 patients in Group II with local anesthetic and steroid. The inclusion criteria was based on the positive response to the diagnostic controlled comparative local anesthetic lumbar facet joint blocks. Outcome measures: Numeric pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index, opioid intake, and work status. All outcome assessments were performed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Results: Significant improvement with significant pain relief (> 50%) and functional improvement (> 40%) were observed in 82% and 85% in Group I, with significant pain relief in over 82% of the patients and improvement in functional status in 78% of the patients. Based on the results of the present study, it appears that patients may experience significant pain relief 44 to 45 weeks of 1 year, requiring approximately 3 to 4 treatments with an average relief of 15 weeks per episode of treatment. Conclusion: Therapeutic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks, with or without steroid, may provide a management option for chronic function-limiting low back pain of facet joint origin. Key words: Chronic low back pain, lumbar facet or zygapophysial joint pain, facet joint nerve or medial branch blocks, comparative controlled local anesthetic blocks, therapeutic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks

scholarly journals A Novel and Effective Acupuncture Modality as a Complementary Therapy to Acute Pain Relief in Inpatients with Rib Fractures

2013 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ko-Hung Lee ◽  
Hsin-Yi Ho ◽  
Chao-Wei Chen ◽  
Ming-Chieh Li ◽  
Yu-Pao Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Complementary Therapy ◽  
Rib Fractures

scholarly journals An Update of the Systematic Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Blocks

2012 ◽  
Vol 6;15 (6;12) ◽  
pp. E869-E907
Author(s):  
Frank J.E. Falco
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Lumbar Facet Joint ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Lumbar Facet

Background: Lumbar facet joints are a well recognized source of low back pain and referred pain in the lower extremity in patients with chronic low back pain. Conventional clinical features and other non-invasive diagnostic modalities are unreliable in diagnosing lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. Controlled diagnostic studies with at least 80% pain relief as the criterion standard have shown the prevalence of lumbar facet joint pain to be 16% to 41% of patients with chronic low back pain without disc displacement or radiculitis, with a false-positive rate of 17% to 49% with a single diagnostic block. Study Design: A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks. Objective: To determine and update the diagnostic accuracy of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in the assessment of chronic low back pain. Methods: A methodological quality assessment of included studies was performed using Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL). Only diagnostic accuracy studies meeting at least 50% of the designated inclusion criteria were utilized for analysis. Studies scoring less than 50% are presented descriptively and analyzed critically. The level of evidence was classified as good, fair, and limited or poor based on the quality of evidence developed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Data sources included relevant literature identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to June 2012, and manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles. Outcome Measures: Studies must have been performed utilizing controlled local anesthetic blocks. Pain relief was categorized as at least 50% pain relief from baseline pain and the ability to perform previously painful movements. Results: A total of 25 diagnostic accuracy studies were included. Of these, one study evaluated 50% to 74% relief as criterion standard with a single block with prevalence of 48%, 4 studies evaluated 75% to 100% relief as the criterion standard with a single block with a prevalence of 31% to 61%, 5 studies evaluated 50% to 74% relief as the criterion standard with controlled blocks with a prevalence of 15% to 61%, and 13 studies evaluated 75% to 100% relief as the criterion standard with controlled blocks with a prevalence of 25% to 45% in heterogenous populations. False-positive rates ranged from 17% to 66% in the 50% to 74% pain relief group and 27% to 49% with at least 75% relief as the criterion standard. Based on this evaluation, the evidence showed that there is good evidence for diagnostic facet joint nerve blocks with 75% to 100% pain relief as the criterion standard with dual blocks and fair evidence with 50% to 74% pain relief as the criterion standard with controlled diagnostic blocks; however, the evidence is poor with single diagnostic blocks of 50% to 74%, and limited for 75% or more pain relief as the criterion standard. Limitations: The shortcomings of this systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks include a paucity of literature and continued debate on an appropriate gold standard. Conclusion: There is good evidence for diagnostic facet joint nerve blocks with 75% to 100% pain relief as the criterion standard with dual blocks, with fair evidence with 50% to 74% pain relief. Key words: Chronic low back pain, lumbar facet or zygapophysial joint pain, facet joint nerve blocks, medial branch blocks, controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks

scholarly journals Sphenopalatine Ganglion versus Greater Occipital Nerve Blocks in Treating Post-Dural Puncture Headache after Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. E443-E451
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Dural Puncture ◽  
Sphenopalatine Ganglion ◽  
Ganglion Block ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Neck Stiffness ◽  
Post Dural Puncture Headache ◽  
Occipital Nerve ◽  
Greater Occipital Nerve ◽  
Blood Patch

BACKGROUND: Despite being invasive, with serious complications, epidural blood patch (EBP) is still considered the gold standard therapy for Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH). The use of Peripheral nerve blocks for PDPH are studied here. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) and greater occipital nerve block (GONB) to relieve PDPH and its associated symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized comparative single-blind trial. SETTING: A University hospital. METHODS: Patients who received spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section, and then developed PDPH during hospitalization or within 5 days after dural puncture were enrolled to receive GONB (n = 47) or SPGB (n = 46) for treatment of PDPH. GONB Group: Patients received bilateral GONB using 3 mL mixture of 2 mL lidocaine 2% plus 1 mL dexamethasone 4 mg on each side of occipital region. SPGB Group: Patients received bilateral SPGB using the same mixture in each nostril. Assessments included Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for severity of headache at supine and sitting positions, nausea NRS, neck stiffness, need for EBP, and complications. RESULTS: The supine and sitting headache NRS scores significantly decreased at 30 minutes after blocks and throughout follow-up period in both groups (P < 0.000). Clinically significant drop of NRS to < 4 was reached earlier in GONB group. There was a significant difference between groups after 2 hours in supine and sitting headache NRS scores (P = 0.020 and 0.030, respectively); however, both treatments showed similar effectiveness from the third hour afterwards (P > 0.05). Both techniques were effective in relieving neck stiffness and nausea (P < 0.000), with no adverse effects. LIMITATIONS: A limitation to this study was the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: GONB and SPGB are equally effective in relieving symptoms of PDPH. Both techniques are safe, simple, and less invasive than EBP. KEY WORDS: Cesarean Section, epidural blood patch greater occipital nerve block, post-dural puncture headache, sphenopalatine ganglion block

scholarly journals Acute pain-relief effects of low power laser irradiation and thermogram of rheumatoid arthritis patients

1989 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
J. Obata ◽  
N. Takahashi ◽  
M. Yanase ◽  
A. Honmura
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Low Power ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Power Laser

scholarly journals Shaping attitudes to postoperative pain relief: The role of the acute pain team

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graeme A. McLeod ◽  
Huw T.O. Davies ◽  
John R. Colvin
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Postoperative Pain Relief

Role of Greater Occipital Nerve Blocks and Trigger Point Injections for Patients With Dizziness and Headache

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 312-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric P. Baron ◽  
Neil Cherian ◽  
Stewart J. Tepper
Keyword(s):  
Trigger Point ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Occipital Nerve ◽  
Greater Occipital Nerve
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document