Comparison of Harmonic Mean versus Arithmetic Mean Clearance Values

1986 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.J. Schaaf ◽  
F.C. Lam ◽  
D.G. Perrier
Keyword(s):  
Arithmetic Mean ◽  
Harmonic Mean

A Neutral Model With Fluctuating Population Size and Its Effective Size

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 161 (1) ◽  
pp. 381-388
Author(s):  
Masaru Iizuka ◽  
Hidenori Tachida ◽  
Hirotsugu Matsuda
Keyword(s):  
Asymptotic Behavior ◽  
Population Size ◽  
Diffusion Model ◽  
Arithmetic Mean ◽  
Harmonic Mean ◽  
Effective Size ◽  
Neutral Model ◽  
Average Heterozygosity ◽  
Special Case ◽  
Concrete Model

Abstract We consider a diffusion model with neutral alleles whose population size is fluctuating randomly. For this model, the effects of fluctuation of population size on the effective size are investigated. The effective size defined by the equilibrium average heterozygosity is larger than the harmonic mean of population size but smaller than the arithmetic mean of population size. To see explicitly the effects of fluctuation of population size on the effective size, we investigate a special case where population size fluctuates between two distinct states. In some cases, the effective size is very different from the harmonic mean. For this concrete model, we also obtain the stationary distribution of the average heterozygosity. Asymptotic behavior of the effective size is obtained when the population size is large and/or autocorrelation of the fluctuation is weak or strong.

scholarly journals Impact of different centroid means on the accuracy of orthometric height modelling by geometric geoid method

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oluyori P. Dare ◽  
Eteje S. Okiemute
Keyword(s):  
Root Mean Square ◽  
Arithmetic Mean ◽  
Orthometric Height ◽  
Harmonic Mean ◽  
Geometric Method ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Microsoft Excel ◽  
Orthometric Heights ◽  
The Impact

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Orthometric height, as well as geoid modelling using the geometric method, requires centroid computation. And this can be obtained using various models, as well as methods. These methods of centroid mean computation have impacts on the accuracy of the geoid model since the basis of the development of the theory of each centroid mean type is different. This paper presents the impact of different centroid means on the accuracy of orthometric height modelling by geometric geoid method.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> DGPS observation was carried out to obtain the coordinates and ellipsoidal heights of selected points. The centroid means were computed with the coordinates using three different centroid means models (arithmetic mean, root mean square and harmonic mean). The computed centroid means were entered accordingly into a Microsoft Excel program developed using the Multiquadratic surface to obtain the model orthometric heights at various centroid means. The root means square error (RMSE) index was applied to obtain the accuracy of the model using the known and the model orthometric heights obtained at various centroid means.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The computed accuracy shows that the arithmetic mean method is the best among the three centroid means types.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> It is concluded that the arithmetic mean method should be adopted for centroid computation, as well as orthometric height modelling using the geometric method.</p>

When Averaging Multiples, the Arithmetic Mean Is Inferior to the Harmonic Mean

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Gilbert E. Matthews
Keyword(s):  
Arithmetic Mean ◽  
Harmonic Mean ◽  
Central Tendency

This article posits that using the arithmetic mean to average multiples is mathematically inferior. A multiple is an inverted ratio with price in the numerator. The harmonic mean is a statistically sound method for averaging inverted ratios. It should be used as a measure of central tendency for multiples, along with the median. Empirically, the harmonic mean and the median of a set of multiples are usually similar. Because the harmonic mean can be overly affected by abnormally low multiples, the valuator must use judgment to exclude outliers.

Remarks on the Neglected Mean

1973 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-255
Author(s):  
Joseph L. Ercolano
Keyword(s):  
Arithmetic Mean ◽  
Harmonic Mean ◽  
Real Numbers ◽  
Positive Real ◽  
Golden Proportion ◽  
The One

The harmonic mean of two positive, real numbers was known to early Greek mathematicians. In fact, it is alleged that “Pythagoras learned in Mesopotamia of three means—the arithmetic, the geometric, and the subcontrary (later called the harmonic)—and of the ‘golden proportion’ relating two of these: the first of two numbers is to their arithmetic mean as their harmonic mean is to the second of the numbers” (Boyer 1968). Archytas, a disciple of Pythagoras (whose most important contribution to mathematics may very well have been his intervention with Dionysius to save the life of his friend, Plato), wrote on the application of these three means to music, and is possibly the one who is responsible for renaming the suhcontrary mean the harmonic mean (Boyer 1968).

Empirical Investigation of Alternative Measures of Central Tendency

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H Black ◽  
Lari B Masten
Keyword(s):  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Arithmetic Mean ◽  
Harmonic Mean ◽  
Central Tendency ◽  
Business Valuation ◽  
Alternative Measures ◽  
Data Points ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Performance Results

There is ongoing controversy in the business valuation literature regarding the preferability of the arithmetic mean or the harmonic mean when estimating ratios for use in business valuation. This research conducts a simulation using data reported from actual market transactions. Successive random samples were taken from data on valuation multiples and alternative measures of central tendency were calculated, accumulating more than 3.7 million data points. The measures (arithmetic mean, median, harmonic mean, geometric mean) were compared using hold-out sampling to identify which measure provided the closest approximation to actual results, evaluated in terms of least squares differences. Results indicated the harmonic mean delivered superior predictions to the other measures of central tendency, with less overstatement. Further, differences in sample size from 5 to 50 observations were evaluated to assess their impact on predictive performance. Results showed substantial improvements up to sample sizes of 20 or 25, with diminished improvements thereafter.

scholarly journals Unification Theories: Means and Generalized Euler Formulas

Axioms ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
Radu Iordanescu ◽  
Florin Felix Nichita ◽  
Ovidiu Pasarescu
Keyword(s):  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Arithmetic Mean ◽  
Harmonic Mean ◽  
Current Paper ◽  
Baxter Equation ◽  
Quadratic Mean ◽  
Euler’S Formula ◽  
Associative Structures ◽  
Generalized Mean

The main concepts in this paper are the means and Euler type formulas; the generalized mean which incorporates the harmonic mean, the geometric mean, the arithmetic mean, and the quadratic mean can be further generalized. Results on the Euler’s formula, the (modified) Yang–Baxter equation, coalgebra structures, and non-associative structures are also included in the current paper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document