Melatonin treatment reduces qualitative decay and improves antioxidant system in highbush blueberry fruit during cold storage

Author(s):  
Anna Magri ◽  
Milena Petriccione
2020 ◽  
Vol 303 ◽  
pp. 125385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morteza Soleimani Aghdam ◽  
Zisheng Luo ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Abbasali Jannatizadeh ◽  
Javad Rezapour Fard ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 254 ◽  
pp. 222-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yavar Sharafi ◽  
Morteza Soleimani Aghdam ◽  
Zisheng Luo ◽  
Abbasali Jannatizadeh ◽  
Farhang Razavi ◽  
...  

Agriculture ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Wasko DeVetter ◽  
Wei Qiang Yang ◽  
Fumiomi Takeda ◽  
Scott Korthuis ◽  
Changying Li

Improved blueberry mechanical harvesting (MH) equipment that maintains fresh market quality are needed due to rising costs and decreasing availability of laborers for harvesting by hand. In 2017, a modified over-the-row (OTR) blueberry harvester with experimental catch surfaces and plates designed to reduce fruit bruising was evaluated. The catch surfaces were made of neoprene (soft catch surface; SCS) or canvas (hard catch surface; HCS) and compared to hand-picked fruit (control). Early- and early/mid-season ‘Duke’ and ‘Draper’, respectively, were evaluated in Oregon, while late-season ‘Elliott’ and ‘Aurora’ were evaluated in Washington. Harvested berries were run through commercial packing lines with fresh pack out recorded and bruise incidence or fresh fruit quality evaluated during various lengths of cold storage. The fresh pack out for ‘Duke’ and ‘Draper’ were 83.5% and 73.2%, respectively, and no difference was noted between SCS and HCS. ‘Duke’ fruit firmness was highest among MH berries with SCS, but firmness decreased in storage after one week. Firmness was highest among hand harvested ‘Draper’ followed by MH with SCS. For ‘Elliott’ and ‘Aurora’, fruit firmness was the same across harvesting methods. ‘Draper’ exhibited more bruising than ‘Duke’, but bruise ratings and the incidence of bruising at ≤10% and ≤20% were similar between hand and MH ‘Draper’ with SCS after 24 h of harvest. ‘Aurora’ berries had similar bruise ratings after 24 h between hand harvesting and MH with SCS, while ‘Elliott’ showed more bruise damage by MH with both SCS and HCS than hand harvested fruit. Although our studies showed slightly lower fresh market blueberry pack outs, loss of firmness, and increased bruise damage in fruit harvested by the experimental MH system compared to hand harvested fruit, higher quality was achieved using SCS compared to HCS. We demonstrated that improved fresh market quality in northern highbush blueberry is achievable by using modified OTR harvesters with SCS and fruit removal by either hand-held pneumatic shakers or rotary drum shakers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 297 ◽  
pp. 124903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxin Li ◽  
Xin Zhou ◽  
Baodong Wei ◽  
Shunchang Cheng ◽  
Qian Zhou ◽  
...  

Horticulturae ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Yi-Wen Wang ◽  
Helaina D. Ludwig ◽  
Harald Scherm ◽  
Marc W. van Iersel ◽  
Savithri U. Nambeesan

Blueberry fruit are perishable after harvesting due to fruit softening, water loss and susceptibility to pathogens. Light, especially blue light, increases the accumulation of anthocyanins and reduces postharvest decay in some fruits, but the effect of blue light on postharvest fruit quality attributes in blueberries is unknown. In this study, we evaluated the effect of blue light on fruit quality, anthocyanin accumulation and disease development during postharvest cold storage (2 °C–4 °C) in two experiments with southern highbush blueberry ‘Star’ and rabbiteye blueberry ‘Alapaha’. Overall, diurnal blue light did not affect postharvest fruit quality attributes, such as visual defects, fruit compression, skin puncture, total soluble solid content and titratable acidity, in the two cultivars compared with their respective controls (diurnal white light or continuous darkness). Further, there was no effect of blue light on fruit color and anthocyanin accumulation. Fruit disease incidence in ‘Star’ ranged from 19.0% to 27.3% after 21 days and in ‘Alapaha’ from 44.9% to 56.2% after 24 days in postharvest storage, followed by 4 days at room temperature, but blue light had no consistent effect on postharvest disease incidence for either cultivar. Disease progression following artificial inoculations with Alternaria tenuissima and Colletotrichum acutatum in ‘Star’ was not influenced by light treatment prior to inoculation and during fruit storage. In a separate experiment, we tested the effect of blue light on color development in ‘Farthing’, a southern highbush blueberry cultivar with fruit prone to non-uniform ripening, whereby the stem-end remains green as the rest of the fruit turns blue. Although green stem-end spots turned blue over time, there was no statistically significant effect of the blue light treatment. Overall, these data indicate that blue light does not affect fruit quality attributes or disease development in ripe blueberry fruit during postharvest storage in the conditions investigated here.


2021 ◽  
Vol 284 ◽  
pp. 110126
Author(s):  
Dan Wang ◽  
Qiyang Chen ◽  
Weiwei Chen ◽  
Qigao Guo ◽  
Yan Xia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document