Identifying factors impacting the efficacy of postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with early‐stage breast cancer and one to two positive lymph nodes

2020 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-133
Author(s):  
Neal Bhutiani ◽  
Michael E. Egger ◽  
Arnold J. Stromberg ◽  
Inder K. Bhutiani ◽  
Nicolás Ajkay ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v102
Author(s):  
B. Graja ◽  
M. Nesrine ◽  
A. Ghorbel ◽  
H El Benna ◽  
Y. Berrazega ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 2338-2344 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Guadagnoli ◽  
C Shapiro ◽  
J H Gurwitz ◽  
R A Silliman ◽  
J C Weeks ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To assess whether the use of adjuvant systemic therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer is influenced by patient age. METHODS A retrospective cohort study based on data collected from medical records and from patients and their surgeons was performed among 746 postmenopausal patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer at 30 hospitals located throughout Minnesota. The adjusted odds of receiving hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and both hormonal therapy and chemotherapy as a function of age was determined. RESULTS Among women with negative lymph nodes, 62% received some form of adjuvant drug therapy. For these women, the likelihood of receiving hormonal therapy or both hormonal therapy and chemotherapy did not vary with patient age and the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy declined with age. Among women with positive lymph nodes, 92% received some form of adjuvant therapy. For these women, the likelihood of receiving hormonal therapy increased with age and the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy declined with age, as did the likelihood of receiving both hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. CONCLUSION The observed associations between age and the use of adjuvant systemic therapy appear to reflect, in general, available information about treatment efficacy and do not suggest underuse among elderly women with early-stage breast cancer. The use of adjuvant therapy depends on clinical factors that predict the increased risk of metastases or the increased likelihood of response to treatment, rather than other sociodemographic factors. Our results also suggest that younger postmenopausal women with positive lymph nodes compared with older women may be undertreated with respect to tamoxifen because of the substitution of chemotherapy for hormonal therapy.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Xu ◽  
Shanshan Bu ◽  
Xiushen Wang ◽  
Hong Ge

Abstract Purpose The application of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in T1–2 female breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive lymph nodes has been controversial. We sought to determine the survival benefits of PMRT in the patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive nodes. Methods A retrospective study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Regs Custom Data (with additional treatment fields) from 2001 to 2011 was performed. Patients who received PMRT were matched by the propensity score with patients who did not receive PMRT. The Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed. Results We identified 56,725 female breast cancer patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive nodes, and 18,646 patients were included in the analysis. After propensity score matching (1:1), with a median follow-up of 116 months, PMRT showed an increase in the OS (P = 0.018) but had no effect on the BCSS. The 10-year OS rates were 76.8% and 74.4%, and the 10-year BCSS rates were 82.8% and 82.2% for the patients who received and who did not receive PMRT, respectively. Only patients with 3 positive nodes could gain the benefit of PMRT for BCSS. Conclusion PMRT for patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive lymph nodes could increase the 10-year OS, and had no effect on the 10-year BCSS. Subgroup analysis indicated that only patients with 3 positive lymph nodes could benefit from PMRT for both the OS and BCSS.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Xu ◽  
Shanshan Bu ◽  
Xiushen Wang ◽  
Hong Ge

Abstract Purpose: The application of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in T1–2 women breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive lymph nodes has been controversial. We sought to determine the survival benefits of PMRT in the patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive nodes.Methods: A retrospective study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Regs Custom Data (with additional treatment fields) from 2001 to 2011 was performed. Patients who received PMRT were matched by the propensity score with patients who did not receive PMRT. The Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed. Results: We identified 56,725 women breast cancer patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive nodes, and 18,646 patients were included in the analysis. After propensity score matching (1:1), with a median follow-up of 116 months, PMRT showed an increase in the OS (P = 0.018) but had no effect on the BCSS. The 10-year OS rates were 76.8% and 74.4%, and the 10-year BCSS rates were 82.8% and 82.2% for the patients who received and who did not receive PMRT, respectively. Only patients with 3 positive nodes could gain the benefit of PMRT for BCSS.Conclusion: PMRT for patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive lymph nodes could increase the 10-year OS, and had no effect on the 10-year BCSS. Subgroup analysis indicated that only patients with 3 positive lymph nodes could benefit from PMRT for both the OS and BCSS.


2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 4105-4110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taku Nakagawa ◽  
Steve R. Martinez ◽  
Yasufumi Goto ◽  
Kazuo Koyanagi ◽  
Minoru Kitago ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. ix16
Author(s):  
T. Koo ◽  
E.Y. Kang ◽  
J.H. Kim ◽  
S.Y. Park ◽  
S.W. Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document