In Vitro and In Vivo Study of a Novel Nanoscale Demineralized Bone Matrix Coated PCL/β‐TCP Scaffold for Bone Regeneration

2020 ◽  
pp. 2000336
Author(s):  
Bo Yuan ◽  
Zhiwei Wang ◽  
Yin Zhao ◽  
Yifan Tang ◽  
Shengyuan Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Demineralized Bone

Rheological properties, biocompatibility and in vivo performance of new hydrogel-based bone fillers

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 1691-1703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Giannoni ◽  
Federico Villa ◽  
Cinzia Cordazzo ◽  
Luciano Zardi ◽  
Paolo Fattori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Rheological Properties ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Demineralized Bone

Three different heterologous substitutes for bone regeneration, manufactured with equine-derived cortical powder, cancellous chips and demineralized bone matrix granules, were compared in vitro and in vivo.

Preparation and In Vitro Characterization of Polycaprolactone and Demineralized Bone Matrix Scaffolds

2012 ◽  
Vol 1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titilayo Moloye ◽  
Christopher Batich
Keyword(s):  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Apatite Formation ◽  
Alizarin Red ◽  
Salt Leaching ◽  
Synthetic Materials ◽  
Calcium And Phosphorus ◽  
Demineralized Bone

ABSTRACTCylindrical porous polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds containing 25, 35, and 50 wt% demineralized bone matrix (DBM) were fabricated using a salt-leaching method for application in bone engineering. In the present work, PCL-DBM scaffolds were monitored for calcium and phosphorus deposition in both deionized (DI) water and simulated body fluid (SBF) for time periods of 5, 10, 15, and 20 days at 37°C under constant rotation. An in vitro assessment of the bioactivity of synthetic materials using SBF under physiological conditions can be used as a barometer of scaffold behavior in vivo. DBM, an osteoinductive material, was used to gauge if there was a correlation between the concentration of DBM within a scaffold and the apatite formation on its surface. Biochemical assays, alizarin red S staining, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with elemental analysis of calcium and phosphorus were consistent in that they confirmed that PCL scaffolds containing 35 wt% DBM in SBF at 14 days post-immersion showed signs of early apatite formation.

The Effect of Carrier Type on Bone Regeneration of Demineralized Bone Matrix In Vivo

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 2135-2140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shima Tavakol ◽  
Ahad Khoshzaban ◽  
Mahmoud Azami ◽  
Iraj Ragerdi Kashani ◽  
Hani Tavakol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Demineralized Bone

Demineralized bone matrix-based microcarrier scaffold favors vascularized large bone regeneration in vivo in a rat model

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiannan Li ◽  
Wenjie Zhang ◽  
Guangdong Zhou ◽  
Yilin Cao ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Matrix Group ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Demineralized Bone

Insufficient neo-vascularization of in vivo implanted cell-seeded scaffold remains a major bottleneck for clinical translation of engineered bone formation. Demineralized bone matrix is an ideal bone scaffold for bone engineering due to its structural and biochemical components similar to those of native bone. We hypothesized that the microcarrier form of demineralized bone matrix favors ingrowth of vessels and bone regeneration upon in vivo implantation. In this study, a rat model of femoral vessel pedicle-based bone engineering was employed by filling the demineralized bone matrix scaffolds inside a silicone chamber that surrounded the vessel pedicles, and to compare the efficiency of vascularized bone regeneration between microcarrier demineralized bone matrix and block demineralized bone matrix. The results showed that bone marrow stem cells better adhered to microcarrier demineralized bone matrix and produced more extracellular matrices during in vitro culture. After in vivo implantation, microcarrier demineralized bone matrix seeded with bone marrow stem cells formed relatively more bone tissue than block demineralized bone matrix counterpart at three months upon histological examination. Furthermore, micro-computed tomography three-dimensional reconstruction showed that microcarrier demineralized bone matrix group regenerate significantly better and more bone tissues than block demineralized bone matrix both qualitatively and quantitatively (p < 0.05). Moreover, micro-computed tomography reconstructed angiographic images also demonstrated significantly enhanced tissue vascularization in microcarrier demineralized bone matrix group than in block demineralized bone matrix group both qualitatively and quantitatively (p < 0.05). Anti-CD31 immunohistochemical staining of (micro-) vessels and semi-quantitative analysis also evidenced enhanced vascularization of regenerated bone in microcarrier demineralized bone matrix group than in block demineralized bone matrix group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the microcarrier form of demineralized bone matrix is an ideal bone regenerative scaffold due to its advantages of osteoinductivity and vascular induction, two essentials for in vivo bone regeneration.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of xenogeneic bone putty with the carrier of hydrogel derived from demineralized bone matrix

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naili Zhang ◽  
Lina Ma ◽  
Xiaowei Liu ◽  
Xiaorui Jiang ◽  
Zhenhai Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
In Vivo Evaluation ◽  
Demineralized Bone ◽  
Bone Putty

Demineralized Bone Matrix Promotes Bone Regeneration In Vivo: A Canine Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 716-722
Author(s):  
Guolin Liu ◽  
Lingxiao Wang ◽  
Lei Hu ◽  
Changying Liu ◽  
Luyuan Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Canine Study ◽  
Demineralized Bone

In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of a Calcium Phosphate and Demineralized Bone Matrix Composite Biomaterial

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Rosenberg ◽  
Aliassghar Tofighi ◽  
N. Camacho ◽  
J. Chang
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Dense Area ◽  
Viscosity Modifier ◽  
Demineralized Bone

A new class of osteoconductive and osteoinductive combination biomaterials composed of calcium phosphate cement (CPC), demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and a water-soluble viscosity modifier were prepared and characterized in-vitro and in-vivo. In previous studies, a range of combinations formulations were tested in order to compare their performance characteristic. In-vitro characterization results show that the mechanical strength is decreased when the amount of DBM increases. However, DBM does not affect the CPC’s ability to set hard and convert to nanocrystalline apatitic calcium phosphate, which shares the chemical structure of natural bone as seen in x-ray diffraction. It is known that the DBM alone is osteoinductive. In-vivo osteoinductivity testing of the formulations in an intramuscular, athymic rat model demonstrated that the combination material is also osteoinductive. Two formulations were chosen for in-vivo efficacy testing based on the results of in-vitro and in-vivo characterization. These formulations were studied using rabbit critical-sized femoral core defect model. The formulations were composed of DBM with particle sizes of 250 to 710 μm, carboxymethyl-cellulose (CMC) as the viscosity modifier and weight percent compositions of 50% DBM/ 45% CPC/ 5% CMC and 60% DBM/ 30% CPC/ 10% CMC. Bone integration and healing was graded at 6, 12, and 24 weeks. The two formulations were compared to the gold standard autograft at 12 weeks and to an empty defect as the negative control at 24 weeks. Based on micro-computed topography (μCT), both formulations allowed for continuity of bone throughout the defect region at all time points. No differences in dense area fraction were seen between two formulations at 6 weeks (p = 0.8661). There was no significant statistical difference between the two formulations and autograft at 12 weeks (p = 0.2467). At 24 weeks, both formulations had significantly higher dense area fractions than empty controls (p = 0.0001). Histologically, the biology of the treatment areas appeared to have returned to normal by 24 weeks with CPC appearing to be the principal osteogenic inducer. In conclusion, these combinations of CPC and DBM offers significant advantages (handling, mechanical properties and osteoinductivity) over current DBM products and can be an effective alternative to autograft in healing of bone defects.

Combined effects of porous hydroxyapatite and demineralized bone matrix on bone induction: in vitro and in vivo study using a nude rat model

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 015008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Hyup Lee ◽  
Kyung-Mee Lee ◽  
Hae-Ri Baek ◽  
Soo-Jeong Jang ◽  
Ji-Ho Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rat Model ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Combined Effects ◽  
Bone Induction ◽  
Porous Hydroxyapatite ◽  
Nude Rat
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document