Assessing the impact of prescribing directives on opioid prescribing practices among Veterans Health Administration providers

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Barber ◽  
David Gagnon ◽  
Jennifer Fonda ◽  
Kelly Cho ◽  
John Hermos ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00981
Author(s):  
Ruchika Gutt ◽  
Sheetal Malhotra ◽  
Michael P. Hagan ◽  
Steve P. Lee ◽  
Katherine Faricy-Anderson ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Most Veterans Health Administration hospitals do not have radiation oncology (RO) departments on-site. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of on-site RO on referral patterns and timeliness of palliative radiation therapy (PRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was sent to medical directors at 149 Veterans Health Administration centers. Questions evaluated frequency of referral for PRT, timeliness of RO consults and treatment, and barriers to referral for PRT. Chi-square analysis was used to evaluate differences between centers that have on-site RO and centers that refer to outside facilities. RESULTS: Of 108 respondents, 33 (31%) have on-site RO. Chi-square analysis revealed that RO consult within 1 week is more likely at centers with on-site RO (68% v 31%; P = .01). Centers with on-site RO more frequently deliver PRT for spinal cord compression within 24 hours (94% v 70%; P = .01). Those without on-site RO were more likely to want increased radiation oncologist involvement (64% v 26%; P < .001). Barriers to referral for PRT included patient ability to travel (81%), patient noncompliance (31%), delays in consult and/or treatment (31%), difficulty contacting a radiation oncologist (14%), and concern regarding excessive number of treatments (13%). Respondents with on-site RO less frequently reported delays in consult and/or treatment (6% v 41%; P < .0001) and difficulty contacting a radiation oncologist (0% v 20%; P = .0056) as barriers. CONCLUSION: Respondents with on-site RO reported improved communication with radiation oncologists and more timely consultation and treatment initiation. Methods to improve timeliness of PRT for veterans at centers without on-site RO should be considered.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1831-1832
Author(s):  
Timothy Joseph Sowicz ◽  
Adam J. Gordon ◽  
Walid F. Gellad ◽  
Xinhua Zhao ◽  
Hongwei Zhang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (S3) ◽  
pp. 927-934
Author(s):  
Friedhelm Sandbrink ◽  
Elizabeth M. Oliva ◽  
Tara L. McMullen ◽  
Amy R. Aylor ◽  
Michael A. Harvey ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Thomas D. Dieringer ◽  
Daisuke Furukawa ◽  
Christopher J. Graber ◽  
Vanessa W. Stevens ◽  
Makoto M. Jones ◽  
...  

Abstract Antibiotic prescribing practices across the Veterans’ Health Administration (VA) experienced significant shifts during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. From 2015 to 2019, antibiotic use between January and May decreased from 638 to 602 days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 days present (DP), while the corresponding months in 2020 saw antibiotic utilization rise to 628 DOT per 1,000 DP.


2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Kidder

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is the largest integrated health system in the U.S. with 7.9 million U.S. veterans enrolled.  Both the number of veterans seeking VHA health services and the cost of delivering such services continue to rise as a result of myriad factors. Kidder examines VHA funding outcomes over the past 10 years in light of the participation of veterans' service organizations (VSOs) in committee hearings; the reliance of lawmakers upon The Independent Budget (IB); and the impact of new performance-based management initiatives on budget outcomes.  Her article highlights the political nature of the VHA budget and the influential role of VSOs in funding outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 894-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C Lund ◽  
Michael E Ohl ◽  
Katherine Hadlandsmyth ◽  
Hilary J Mosher

Abstract Introduction Opioid prescribing is heterogenous across the US, where 3- to 5-fold variation has been observed across states or other geographical units. Residents of rural areas appear to be at greater risk for opioid misuse, mortality, and high-risk prescribing. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provides a unique setting for examining regional and rural–urban differences in opioid prescribing, as a complement and contrast to extant literature. The objective of this study was to characterize regional variation in opioid prescribing across Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and examine differences between rural and urban veterans. Materials and Methods Following IRB approval, this retrospective observational study used national administrative VHA data from 2016 to assess regional variation and rural–urban differences in schedule II opioid prescribing. The primary measure of opioid prescribing volume was morphine milligram equivalents (MME) dispensed per capita. Secondary measures included incidence, prevalence of any use, and prevalence of long-term use. Results Among 4,928,195 patients, national VHA per capita opioid utilization in 2016 was 1,038 MME. Utilization was lowest in the Northeast (894 MME), highest in the West (1,368 MME), and higher among rural (1,306 MME) than urban (988 MME) residents (p &lt; 0.001). Most of the difference between rural and urban veterans (318 MME) was attributable to differences in long-term opioid use (312 MME), with similar rates of short-term use. Conclusion There is substantial regional and rural–urban variation in opioid prescribing in VHA. Rural veterans receive over 30% more opioids than their urban counterparts. Further research is needed to identify and address underlying causes of these differences, which could include access barriers for non-pharmacologic treatments for chronic pain.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1522-1529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Barnett ◽  
Xinhua Zhao ◽  
Michael J. Fine ◽  
Carolyn T. Thorpe ◽  
Florentina E. Sileanu ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1132-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila C. Kahwati ◽  
John R. Elter ◽  
Kristy A. Straits-Tröster ◽  
Linda S. Kinsinger ◽  
Victoria J. Davey

Medical Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy K. Rosen ◽  
Susan Loveland ◽  
Marlena Shin ◽  
Michael Shwartz ◽  
Amresh Hanchate ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document