scholarly journals Intrauterine administration of platelet‐rich plasma improves embryo implantation by increasing the endometrial thickness in women with repeated implantation failure: A single‐arm self‐controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 350-356
Author(s):  
Maki Kusumi ◽  
Tatsuji Ihana ◽  
Takako Kurosawa ◽  
Yasuo Ohashi ◽  
Osamu Tsutsumi
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aihua He ◽  
Yangyun Zou ◽  
Cheng Wan ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Qiong Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Window of implantation (WOI) displacement was known as one of endometrial origin leading to embryo implantation failure, especially for repeated implantation failure (RIF). A accurately prediction tool of endometrial receptivity (ER) is extraordinary needed to precisely guide the successful embryo implantation. We aimed to establish an RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test tool (rsERT) using transcriptomic biomarkers, and to evaluate the benefit of personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by this tool in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF).Methods: Two-phase strategy including tool establishment with retrospective data and benefit evaluation with prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial. In the first phase, the rsERT was established by sequencing and analyzing the RNA of endometrial tissues from 50 infertile patients with normal window of implantation (WOI) timing. In the second phase, 142 patients with RIF were recruited and grouped by patient self-selection (experimental group, n=56; control group, n=86). pET guided by rsERT in the experimental group, and conventional ET in the control group. Results: The rsERT, comprising 175 biomarker genes, showed an average accuracy of 98.4% by using 10-fold cross-validation. IPR of experimental group (50.0%) was significantly improved compared to that (23.7%) of control group (RR, 2.107; 95% CI, 1.159 to 3.830; P = 0.017) when transferring day 3 embryos. Although not statistically different, IPR of experimental group (63.6%) was still 20 percentage points higher than that (40.7%) of control group (RR, 1.562; 95% CI, 0.898 to 2.718; P = 0.111) when transferring blastocyst. Regression analysis can precisely predict the optimal WOI time by using all samples as training dataset (R2= 0.92).Conclusions: The rsERT was developed to accurately predict WOI period and significantly improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with RIF, indicating the clinical potential of rsERT-guided pET. Optimization of the model made it possible to predict the optimal WOI by one-point sampling.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-DDD-17013375. Registered 14 November 2017, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aihua He ◽  
Yangyun Zou ◽  
Cheng Wan ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Qiong Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Window of implantation (WOI) displacement is one of the endometrial origins of embryo implantation failure, especially repeated implantation failure (RIF). An accurate prediction tool for endometrial receptivity (ER) is extraordinarily needed to precisely guide successful embryo implantation. We aimed to establish an RNA-Seq-based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) tool using transcriptomic biomarkers and to evaluate the benefit of personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by this tool in patients with RIF. Methods This was a two-phase strategy comprising tool establishment with retrospective data and benefit evaluation with a prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial. In the first phase, rsERT was established by sequencing and analyzing the RNA of endometrial tissues from 50 IVF patients with normal WOI timing. In the second phase, 142 patients with RIF were recruited and grouped by patient self-selection (experimental group, n = 56; control group, n = 86). pET guided by rsERT was performed in the experimental group and conventional ET in the control group. Results The rsERT, comprising 175 biomarker genes, showed an average accuracy of 98.4% by using tenfold cross-validation. The intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR) of the experimental group (50.0%) was significantly improved compared to that (23.7%) of the control group (RR, 2.107; 95% CI 1.159 to 3.830; P = 0.017) when transferring day-3 embryos. Although not significantly different, the IPR of the experimental group (63.6%) was still 20 percentage points higher than that (40.7%) of the control group (RR, 1.562; 95% CI 0.898 to 2.718; P = 0.111) when transferring blastocysts. Conclusions The rsERT was developed to accurately predict the WOI period and significantly improve the pregnancy outcomes of patients with RIF, indicating the clinical potential of rsERT-guided pET. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-DDD-17013375. Registered 14 November 2017, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx


GYNECOLOGY ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 66-70
Author(s):  
M I Polovneva ◽  
I E Korneeva ◽  
O V Bourmenskaya

Objective. To carry out an analysis of the data available in scientific literature on modern methods of influence at endometrial receptivity in patients with recurrent implantation failure. Materials and methods. The review includes the data of foreign and Russia papers published on PubMed during the last 7-10 years. Results. There are studies described the role of endometrial scratching, infusion granulocyte colony stimulating factor, autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells, autologous platelet-rich plasma, the endometrial receptivity array in treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Conclusion. Several adjuvant therapies and diagnostic tests have been used along with IVF to increase the pregnancy rates for women with repeated implantation failure. Perhaps a new test-system to find personal predictors of endometrial receptivity can tern up a positive effect at patients with RIF.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 879-885
Author(s):  
Ling Liu ◽  
Xiaoyan Liu ◽  
Sheng Luo ◽  
Xiaohan Wang ◽  
Zhiyan Xu ◽  
...  

Objective: The effects investigated in this study for the therapy with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the thin endometrium in a rat model and patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF). Methods: PRP were immediately injected into uterine cavity after the establishing a model of thin endometrial injury by injection with 95% ethanol into uterus of SD rat. We have used H&E staining to explore the endometrial morphological alteration. The immunohistochemistry, Western blots, and quantitative RT-PCR were used to determine the endometrial receptivity. RL95-2 cells were incubated with RPR at the different concentrations to detect the effect of PRP on the endometrial epithelial cell proliferation. Patients (n = 51) were divided into the control and PRP treatment groups. Patients in the PRP treatment group received PRP by intrauterine perfusion. Results: Endometrial morphology was significantly improved after PRP intrauterine infusion thrice-administered SD rats. PRP increased the thickness of thin endometrium in rats and up-regulate the expression of receptivity markers, including vimentin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and integrin β3. In the control (n = 25) and PRP treatment (n = 26) groups, no significant differences were observed in rates of clinical pregnancy (50.0% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.67), implantation (40.5% vs. 26.0%, p = 0.15) and miscarriage (30.8% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.48). Conclusions: The transplantation of PRP repairs the endometrial injury by suppressing receptivity, enhancing endometrial cell proliferation and vascular remodeling. PRP improves the pregnancy rate in RIF patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Barad ◽  
S K Darmon ◽  
A Benor ◽  
N Gleicher

Abstract Study question Does exposure of ovaries to autologous growth factors in platelet rich plasma (APRP) affect the pituitary ovarian axis? Summary answer Within 60 days after injection, growing follicle numbers and estrogen levels increased, though FSH did not change, with effects most pronounced in still menstruating women. What is known already APRP is extracted from a patient’s autologous blood and delivers growth factors. It is widely used in several medical specialties and has in infertility practice been reported to increase folicle/egg numbers if injected into ovaries and improve endometrial thickness/implantation if used for perfusion of the endometrium. Study design, size, duration Prospective observational cohort study of women with low functional ovarian reserve, followed for 60 days after subcortical injection of ovaries. Participants/materials, setting, methods 44 women with prior poor response to ovulation induction, FSH > 12 mIU/mL and AMH < 1.0 ng/mL. APRP was prepared using Regen Lab PRP Kit which is approved by the US-FDA. 1.0–1.5 ml of PRP was injected into the cortex of each ovary divided among 7 to 10 injection sites. Participants were followed every three days with monitoring for estradiol, FSH and follicle growth for the first two weeks after PRP and then weekly. Main results and the role of chance 21/43 patients still regularly menstruated (subgroup A, age 43.9 ± 5.1 years); 23/43 (subgroup B, age 42.6 ± 6.2 years) were amenorrheic for a median of 6 months. In A, AMH, FSH and estradiol were 0.18 ± 0.20 ng/mL, 37.5 ± 47.6 mIU/mL, and 100.2 ± 73.4 pg/mL, while in B they were 0.06 ± 0.11 ng/mL, 73.0 ± 44.8 mIU/mL and 66.7 ± 57.6 pg/mL. Following APRP, A-patients demonstrated increased estradiol to 211 ± 193.7 pg/mL (P = 0.029) while B-patients only demonstrated a trend to 98.1 ± 86.5 (P = 0.09). Among A patients, 14/21 (66.7%) entered IVF cycles and 5/21 (23.8%) reached retrieval. So-far 1 patients established an ongoing clinical pregnancy. Among B patients 8/23 (34.8%) entered IVF cycles and only 2/23 (8.7%) reached retrieval and none achieved pregnancy. Limitations, reasons for caution This observational study was only carried out to estimate possible effects of APRP treatments. Based on these observations, we are now conducting a randomized controlled trial, limited to cycling women under age 45 years [registration # NCT04278313]. Wider implications of the findings: PRP appears to have limited ability to affect ovarian reserve of older, and especially amenorrheic women. It may, however, exert more favorable effects on still menstruating women. Promotion of APRP treatment as “ovarian rejuvenation,” however, appears to be an inappropriate choice of words. Trial registration number N/A


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document