scholarly journals OP14.01: Maternal body composition and energy expenditure: their relationship to neonatal growth restriction in twin pregnancies based on fetal growth potential

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 104-105
Author(s):  
M. Gandhi ◽  
L.M. Mack ◽  
R. Gandhi ◽  
R. Shypailo ◽  
A. Adolph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
Maternal Body ◽  
Neonatal Growth ◽  
Twin Pregnancies

INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION - A REVIEW ARTICLE

2018 ◽  
pp. 184-195
Author(s):  
Minh Son Pham ◽  
Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen ◽  
Dinh Vinh Tran
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Intrauterine Growth ◽  
No Gold Standard

Small for gestational age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) is difficult to define exactly. In this pregnancy condition, the fetus does not reach its biological growth potential as a consequence of impaired placental function, which may be because of a variety of factors. Fetuses with FGR are at risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality, and poor long-term health outcomes, such as impaired neurological and cognitive development, and cardiovascular and endocrine diseases in adulthood. At present no gold standard for the diagnosis of SGA/FGR exists. The first aim of this review is to: summarize areas of consensus and controversy between recently published national guidelines on small for gestational age or fetal growth restriction; highlight any recent evidence that should be incorporated into existing guidelines. Another aim to summary a number of interventions which are being developed or coming through to clinical trial in an attempt to improve fetal growth in placental insufficiency. Key words: fetal growth restriction (FGR), Small for gestational age (SGA)

The role of ultrasound in the prediction of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies: are we there yet?

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Raquel Neves ◽  
Filipa Nunes ◽  
Miguel Branco ◽  
Maria do Céu Almeida ◽  
Isabel Santos Silva
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Fetal Malformations ◽  
Twin Pregnancies

AbstractObjective:To analyze the accuracy of ultrasound prediction of birth weight discordance (BWD) and the influence of chorionicity and fetal growth restriction (FGR) on ultrasound performance.Methods:Retrospective analysis of 176 twin pregnancies at a Portuguese tertiary center, between 2008 and 2014. Last ultrasound biometry was recorded. Cases with delivery before 24 weeks, fetal malformations, interval between last ultrasound and deliver >3 weeks, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome and monoamniotic pregnancies were excluded. The accuracy of prediction of BWD was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC).Results:BWD ≥20% was present in 21.6% of twin pregnancies. EBW had the best predictive performance for BWD (AUC 0.838, 95%CI 0.760–0.916), with a negative predictive value of 86.9% and a positive predictive value of 51.3%. Chorionicity did not influence ultrasound performance. None of the biometric variables analyzed was predictive of BWD in pregnancies without FGR.Conclusion:The accuracy of ultrasound in the prediction of BWD is limited, particularly in pregnancies without fetal growth restriction. Clinical decisions should not rely on BWD alone.

Identification of newborns with Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) in weight and/or length based on constitutional growth potential

2006 ◽  
Vol 165 (10) ◽  
pp. 717-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Mamelle ◽  
Magali Boniol ◽  
Olivier Rivière ◽  
Marie O. Joly ◽  
Georges Mellier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Potential

Fetal growth restriction: unresolved issues of risk stratification, early diagnosis, and obstetric management

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 76-86
Author(s):  
N.M. Podzolkova ◽  
◽  
Yu.V. Denisova ◽  
M.Yu. Skvortsova ◽  
T.V. Denisova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Obstetric Management ◽  
Language Literature

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) refers to pregnancy complications associated with an increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality and is defined in the Russian-language literature as the fetal size and weight retardation in relation to the norm for a given gestational age, and in the English-language literature – as the inability of the fetus to realize its genetically determined growth potential. FGR is the cause of 43% of stillbirths of unspecified etiology, and some cases remain undiagnosed even in high-risk populations due to the lack of universal diagnostic standards for this pathology. The review presents a critical analysis of the existing definitions of FGR, the latest data on risk factors, an assessment of diagnostic methods for its early and late forms, the prospects of using biomarkers and instrumental methods of examination in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes, and an algorithm for the management of pregnancy complicated by FGR. For a more complete coverage of the literature and deeper understanding of the nosology, attention is focused on FGR that is not accompanied by preeclampsia and other hypertensive disorders, which occur in about 30% of cases. Key words: placental insufficiency, fetometry, percentile, pulsatility index, fetal growth restriction For citation: Podzolkova N.M., Denisova Yu.V., Skvortsova M.Yu., Denisova T.V., Shovgenova D.S. Fetal growth restriction: unresolved issues of risk stratification, early diagnosis, and obstetric management. Vopr. ginekol. akus. perinatol. (Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology). 2021; 20(5): 76–86. (In Russian). DOI: 10.20953/1726-1678-2021-5-76-86

Whole genome miRNA profiling revealed miR-199a as potential placental pathogenesis of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies

Placenta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 44-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Meng ◽  
Yvonne Kwun Yue Cheng ◽  
Ling Wu ◽  
Piya Chaemsaithong ◽  
Maran Bo Wah Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Monochorionic Twin ◽  
Mirna Profiling ◽  
Twin Pregnancies

scholarly journals Are Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Weight Discordance or Fetal Growth Restriction at Higher Risk of Preeclampsia?

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3276
Author(s):  
Veronica Giorgione ◽  
Amar Bhide ◽  
Rohan Bhate ◽  
Keith Reed ◽  
Asma Khalil
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Maternal Blood ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Disorders ◽  
Maternal Risk Factors ◽  
Maternal Risk ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Twin Pregnancies ◽  
Maternal Blood Pressure

Studies have reported controversial findings on the association between fetal growth restriction (FGR) or intertwin weight discordance and the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in twin pregnancies. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between twin growth disorders and HDP. Twin pregnancies resulting in two live births at St George’s Hospital between 2000 and 2019 were included. FGR or small-for-gestational-age (SGA) at birth was assessed using singleton and twin reference charts. Intertwin discordance [(large birthweight − small birthweight)/(large birthweight) × 100%)] was calculated. Logistic regression models were performed. SGA (aOR 2.34, 95% CI 1.60–3.44, p < 0.001), intertwin discordance ≥25% (aOR 2.10, 95% CI 1.26–3.49, p = 0.004) and their co-existence (aOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.16–3.54, p = 0.013) were significantly associated with HDP. After adjusting for the known maternal risk factors of HDP and the intertwin discordance, SGA (using the twin charts) was the strongest independent risk factor associated with HDP (aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.40–3.22, p < 0.001) and preeclampsia (aOR 2.34, 95% CI 1.45–3.76, p < 0.001). This study highlights that the presence of at least one SGA twin is significantly associated with HDP during pregnancy. Therefore, maternal blood pressure should be closely monitored in twin pregnancies complicated by SGA with or without intertwin discordance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document