Quasi-geostrophic turbulence and the mesoscale variability

Author(s):  
Jackson R. Herring
Tellus ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Leonard Steinberg

2009 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Tjernström ◽  
Thorsten Mauritsen

2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Roullet ◽  
J. C. McWilliams ◽  
X. Capet ◽  
M. J. Molemaker

Abstract High-resolution simulations of β-channel, zonal-jet, baroclinic turbulence with a three-dimensional quasigeostrophic (QG) model including surface potential vorticity (PV) are analyzed with emphasis on the competing role of interior and surface PV (associated with isopycnal outcropping). Two distinct regimes are considered: a Phillips case, where the PV gradient changes sign twice in the interior, and a Charney case, where the PV gradient changes sign in the interior and at the surface. The Phillips case is typical of the simplified turbulence test beds that have been widely used to investigate the effect of ocean eddies on ocean tracer distribution and fluxes. The Charney case shares many similarities with recent high-resolution primitive equation simulations. The main difference between the two regimes is indeed an energization of submesoscale turbulence near the surface. The energy cycle is analyzed in the (k, z) plane, where k is the horizontal wavenumber. In the two regimes, the large-scale buoyancy forcing is the primary source of mechanical energy. It sustains an energy cycle in which baroclinic instability converts more available potential energy (APE) to kinetic energy (KE) than the APE directly injected by the forcing. This is due to a conversion of KE to APE at the scale of arrest. All the KE is dissipated at the bottom at large scales, in the limit of infinite resolution and despite the submesoscales energizing in the Charney case. The eddy PV flux is largest at the scale of arrest in both cases. The eddy diffusivity is very smooth but highly nonuniform. The eddy-induced circulation acts to flatten the mean isopycnals in both cases.


2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2770-2789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Ferrari ◽  
James C. McWilliams ◽  
Vittorio M. Canuto ◽  
Mikhail Dubovikov

Abstract In the stably stratified interior of the ocean, mesoscale eddies transport materials by quasi-adiabatic isopycnal stirring. Resolving or parameterizing these effects is important for modeling the oceanic general circulation and climate. Near the bottom and near the surface, however, microscale boundary layer turbulence overcomes the adiabatic, isopycnal constraints for the mesoscale transport. In this paper a formalism is presented for representing this transition from adiabatic, isopycnally oriented mesoscale fluxes in the interior to the diabatic, along-boundary mesoscale fluxes near the boundaries. A simple parameterization form is proposed that illustrates its consequences in an idealized flow. The transition is not confined to the turbulent boundary layers, but extends into the partially diabatic transition layers on their interiorward edge. A transition layer occurs because of the mesoscale variability in the boundary layer and the associated mesoscale–microscale dynamical coupling.


2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 82-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Jouanno ◽  
Julio Sheinbaum ◽  
Bernard Barnier ◽  
Jean-Marc Molines ◽  
Laurent Debreu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (10) ◽  
pp. 1313-1333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Cipollone ◽  
Simona Masina ◽  
Andrea Storto ◽  
Doroteaciro Iovino

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document