Sample Preparation for Nucleic Acid Amplification

Author(s):  
Frederick D. Quinn
2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Willi K. Roth

AbstractEuropean manufacturers of plasma products and German blood transfusion services were the first to introduce nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) of blood products in the mid-1990s. Their primary goal was to increase the safety of blood by closing as far as possible the diagnostic window, which exists after the onset of viral infection until the appearance of the first detectable antibodies. Sample preparation, transport and storage are crucial steps in a quality-controlled PCR. Sensitivity and contamination rates highly depend on the sample preparation and storage techniques. Anticoagulants must be selected carefully because some may inhibit the PCR. Dilution of samples by pooling needs to be considered and should be compensated for by subsequent virus enrichment procedures, e.g. centrifugation. The whole process of sample preparation, pooling and virus enrichment must be validated and quality control measures must be implemented. Reagents for the extraction of viral nucleic acids should not pose any risk to the laboratory staff. Nevertheless, the reagents should be highly efficient in liberating viral nucleic acids at high yield and purity for the following amplification reactions. At this critical stage, quality control measures should guarantee an efficient extraction process and contain potential sources of contaminations. Several methods are available for the amplification of nucleic acids. PCR is the most common, especially in in-house assays. The amplification of nucleic acids should be performed as far as possible in a closed system, which may be guaranteed best by real-time PCR approaches. Reaction tubes need never be opened during the amplification because detection can be performed through the closed tube. Amplicons that could contaminate the following PCR reactions will not be released. It is of great importance to blood transfusion services to guarantee that negative results un-equivocally indicate virus negative blood donations. Therefore, internal control sequences should be implemented in each individual PCR reaction in order to monitor that the individual PCR has worked correctly. Besides internal control sequences, external negative and positive controls should be implemented in each PCR run to demonstrate false positive reactions as well as to monitor pre-PCR processes like virus enrichment and extraction. The whole process needs to be validated according to the criteria set in national guidelines or by national authorities. External quality assessment programs are highly recommended.


Lab on a Chip ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (17) ◽  
pp. 2769-2785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juxin Yin ◽  
Yuanjie Suo ◽  
Zheyu Zou ◽  
Jingjing Sun ◽  
Shan Zhang ◽  
...  

Integrated microfluidic systems with sample preparation and nucleic acid amplification can increase treatment efficiency and improve care.


Lab on a Chip ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (14) ◽  
pp. 2347-2371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Magro ◽  
Camille Escadafal ◽  
Pierre Garneret ◽  
Béatrice Jacquelin ◽  
Aurélia Kwasiborski ◽  
...  

On-field infectious disease diagnostics can be performed with paper microfluidics through sample preparation and nucleic acid amplification.


Biosensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faye M. Walker ◽  
Kuangwen Hsieh

Advances in nucleic acid amplification technologies have revolutionized diagnostics for systemic, inherited, and infectious diseases. Current assays and platforms, however, often require lengthy experimental procedures and multiple instruments to remove contaminants and inhibitors from clinically-relevant, complex samples. This requirement of sample preparation has been a bottleneck for using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) at the point of care (POC), though advances in “lab-on-chip” platforms that integrate sample preparation and NAATs have made great strides in this space. Alternatively, direct NAATs—techniques that minimize or even bypass sample preparation—present promising strategies for developing POC diagnostic tools for analyzing real-world samples. In this review, we discuss the current status of direct NAATs. Specifically, we surveyed potential testing systems published from 1989 to 2017, and analyzed their performances in terms of robustness, sensitivity, clinical relevance, and suitability for POC diagnostics. We introduce bubble plots to facilitate our analysis, as bubble plots enable effective visualization of the performances of these direct NAATs. Through our review, we hope to initiate an in-depth examination of direct NAATs and their potential for realizing POC diagnostics, and ultimately transformative technologies that can further enhance healthcare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1117-1125
Author(s):  
Katrin Krõlov ◽  
Julia Uusna ◽  
Tiia Grellier ◽  
Liis Andresen ◽  
Jekaterina Jevtuševskaja ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (19) ◽  
pp. 13254-13261
Author(s):  
David E. Gaddes ◽  
Pei-wei Lee ◽  
Alexander Y. Trick ◽  
Pornpat Athamanolap ◽  
Christine M. O’Keefe ◽  
...  

The Analyst ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Songhyun LEE ◽  
Junkyu Song ◽  
Sanghyo Kim

Nucleic acid amplification is a widely used diagnostic tool, although it requires a relatively time-consuming and complicated extraction step. To address this issue outside the laboratory, we investigated a sample...


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document