Geomorphology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 350 ◽  
pp. 106917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaguang Li ◽  
Michael C. Grenfell ◽  
Hao Wei ◽  
Stephen Tooth ◽  
Sophea Ngiem

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman D Smith ◽  
Rudy L Slingerland ◽  
Marta Pérez-Arlucea ◽  
Galina S Morozova

Several major avulsions of the Saskatchewan River have occurred in the Cumberland Marshes (east-central Saskatchewan) during the past few thousand years. The most recent avulsion occurred in about the 1870s, converting over 500 km2 of floodplain into a belt of anastomosing channels, splay complexes, and small lakes, a region that is still evolving today. The avulsion began near the tip of a large meander bend by following a small outflowing creek (Sturgeon River) which in turn followed an abandoned former channel of the Saskatchewan River. Flow began to permanently divert out of the Saskatchewan when a narrow strip of floodplain separating the Sturgeon River from the nearby Torch River became breached. Diversion into the connected Sturgeon-Torch began to increase sometime in the 1870s and probably culminated around 1882. The triggering event for the avulsion may have been a chute cutoff of the meander bend, shown by numerical modeling experiments to have significantly raised water-surface elevations at the avulsion site. Increasing flow diversion soon overwhelmed the smaller Sturgeon-Torch channel (now known as the New Channel), and several crevasse splays formed to help accommodate avulsive discharge. Sixteen kilometres downstream, most of the avulsive flow spilled out of the New Channel to form a shallow (~1 m), marshy floodplain lake which flowed eastward down the regional floodplain gradient to the basin presently occupied by Cumberland Lake. Since its inception, the avulsion-generated lake has become gradually infilled by prograding splay complexes fed by networks of anastomosing channels to characterize most of the present-day avulsion belt.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hessel Woolderink ◽  
Steven Weisscher ◽  
Maarten Kleinhans ◽  
Cornelis Kasse ◽  
Ronald Van Balen

<p>Normal faulting acts as a forcing on the morphodynamics of alluvial rivers by changing the topographic gradient of the river valley and channel around the fault zone. Normal faulting affects river morphodynamics either instantaneously by surface rupturing earthquakes, or gradually by continuous vertical displacement. The morphodynamic responses to normal faulting range from longitudinal bed profile adjustments to channel pattern changes. However, the effect of faulting on river morphodynamics and morphology is complex, as they also depend on numerous local, non-tectonic characteristics of flow, river bed/bank composition and vegetation cover. Moreover, river response to faulting is often transient. Such time-dependent river response is important to consider when deriving relationships between faulting and river dynamics from a morphological and sedimentological record. To enhance our understanding of river response to tectonic faulting, we used the physics-based, two-dimensional morphodynamic model Nays2D to simulate the responses of a laboratory-scale alluvial river to various faulting and offset scenarios. Our model focusses on the morphodynamic responses at the scale of multiple meander bends around a normal fault zone. Channel sinuosity increases as the downstream meander bend expands as a result of the faulting-enhanced valley gradient, after which a chute cutoff reduces channel sinuosity to a new dynamic equilibrium that is generally higher than the pre-faulting sinuosity. Relative uplift of the downstream part of the river due to a fault leads to reduced fluvial activity upstream, caused by a backwater effect. The position along a meander bend at which faulting occurs has a profound influence on channel sinuosity; fault locations that enhance flow velocities over the point bar result in a faster sinuosity increase and subsequent chute cutoff than locations that cause increased flow velocity directed towards the outer floodplain. Our study shows that inclusion of process-based reasoning in the interpretation of geomorphological and sedimentological observations of fluvial response to faulting improves our understanding of the natural processes involved and, therefore, contributes to better prediction of faulting effects on river morphodynamics.</p>


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Ann Zinger ◽  
◽  
James L. Best ◽  
Bruce Rhoads ◽  
Marcelo H. Garcia

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 2156-2169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. H. Weisscher ◽  
Yasuyuki Shimizu ◽  
Maarten G. Kleinhans

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document