DNA Binding (Gel Retardation Assay) Analysis for Identification of Aryl Hydrocarbon (Ah) Receptor Agonists and Antagonists

Author(s):  
Anatoly A. Soshilov ◽  
Michael S. Denison
1996 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 1077-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Fang Lu ◽  
Michael Santostefano ◽  
Bernadette D.M. Cunningham ◽  
Michael D. Threadgill ◽  
Stephen Safe

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 2692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Faber ◽  
Anatoly Soshilov ◽  
Sara Giani Tagliabue ◽  
Laura Bonati ◽  
Michael Denison

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that modulates gene expression following its binding and activation by structurally diverse chemicals. Species differences in AhR functionality have been observed, with the mouse AhR (mAhR) and human AhR (hAhR) exhibiting significant differences in ligand binding, coactivator recruitment, gene expression and response. While the AhR agonist indirubin (IR) is a more potent activator of hAhR-dependent gene expression than the prototypical ligand 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), it is a significantly less potent activator of the mAhR. DNA binding analysis confirmed the greater potency/efficacy of IR in stimulating transformation/DNA binding of the hAhR in vitro and domain-swapping experiments demonstrated that the enhanced response to IR was primarily due to the hAhR ligand binding domain (LBD). Site-directed mutagenesis and functional analysis studies revealed that mutation of H326 and A349 in the mAhR LBD to the corresponding residues in the hAhR LBD significantly increased the potency of IR. Since these mutations had no significant effect on ligand binding, these residues likely contribute to an enhanced efficiency of transformation/DNA binding by IR-bound hAhR. Molecular docking to mAhR LBD homology models further elucidated the different roles of the A375V mutation in TCDD and IR binding, as revealed by [3H]TCDD competitive binding results. These results demonstrate the differential binding of structurally diverse ligands within the LBD of a given AhR and confirm that amino acid differences within the LBD of AhRs contribute to significant species differences in ligand response.


1995 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
G. Pollio ◽  
D. Pasino ◽  
S. Santagati ◽  
E. Vegeto ◽  
D. Amadori ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 89 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 141-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Chaloupka ◽  
N. Harper ◽  
V. Krishnan ◽  
M. Santostefano ◽  
L.V. Rodriguez ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 7 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 191-198
Author(s):  
Kathy Chaloupka ◽  
Nyla Harper ◽  
Venkatesh Krishnan ◽  
Michael Steinberg ◽  
Michael Santostefano ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 274 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
A J Cary ◽  
J J Dougherty

When it is bound to a specific ligand such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, mild heating can convert the Ah (aryl hydrocarbon) receptor into a form capable of binding DNA. We found that physiological (1-3 mM) levels of ATP substantially increased the transformation of the receptor to its DNA-binding form. GTP, UTP and CTP had similar effects. ADP also promoted this transformation, but was less effective than ATP at low concentrations. Pyrophosphate too promoted transformation, but AMP had little effect. The process did not require nucleotide hydrolysis, since non-hydrolysable analogues of ATP such as adenosine 5′-[beta gamma-imido]triphosphate were nearly as effective as ATP itself. Inhibitors of ATP-stimulated proteases did not significantly affect the ability of ATP to promote receptor transformation, which suggests that the effect of ATP was not mediated by these proteases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document