Civil Society Organizations and Policy Making on Gender Issues: South Africa and Nigeria in Comparative Perspective

Author(s):  
Tolulope Adeogun
2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 858-882
Author(s):  
Peter VonDoepp

AbstractWhy does collective resistance to democratic backsliding emerge in some contexts and not others? The experience of Malawi in 2011–2012 offers an opportunity to explore this question. In the face of attacks on democratic rights and institutions, large-scale popular and civil society mobilization challenged the government’s authoritarian tendencies. Drawing on collective action theories and comparing Malawi’s experience to that of Zambia, VonDoepp argues that Malawi’s resistance arose in an environment that was favorable to its emergence. Economic conditions had generated grievances against government, polarization remained modest, and civil society organizations benefitted from credibility and the presence of allies that facilitated activism.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoljargal Dembereldorj

<p>This paper explains and examines the case of Mongolian civil society role by focusing on the issue of how and to what extent civil society organizations influenced on the current redistributive policy making in Mongolia. To explain this issue, the outside initiative model proposed by Cobb, Ross and Ross (1976) helps us to understand the influence of civil society organizations on policymakers and redistributive policy making. For the analysis, process tracing method was applied with over 80 Mongolian media sources. The findings suggest that Mongolian civil society organizations made significant influence on setting redistributive policy agenda with its rapid expansion and various pressure actions. </p>


Author(s):  
Natalia Garay ◽  
◽  
Santiago Leyva ◽  
Carolina Turriago ◽  
◽  
...  

This article explores the possibilities of network management to increase the capacity of business foundations to exert influence on the process of agenda-setting in public policies. This case illustrates how three foundations (Éxito Foundation, Alpina Foundation and ALAS Foundation) helped to coordinate one hundred civil society organizations to influence the Colombian National Development Plan (2018-2022). The case shows that business foundations can play an important role in setting the policy agenda by working as articulators of multiple fragmented actors of civil society. The article details the specific mechanisms used to pursue this articulation through the creation of a policy network known as NiñezYA. This in turn suggests that other foundations and NGOs could use the same strategies to increase their influence in policy making.


Author(s):  
О. А. Дмитренко ◽  

The issue of interaction of the non-governmental sector with state and local authorities always remains relevant, primarily due to changes in the dynamics and trends of this process. Today in Ukraine there is a wide range of interaction tools that can be used by both civil society organizations and individual citizens to communicate with the authorities. However, a characteristic feature of the non-governmental sector is not only the requirement of accountability on the part of the state, but also participation in the formation of a political course and roadmap in a given area. In this study, we analyzed how the third sector currently uses legally regulated methods of communication with the authorities to participate in policy-making and change.


2021 ◽  
pp. 357-414
Author(s):  
Emma Lantschner

Any attempt to address discrimination through litigation must be combined with efforts to prevent discrimination from happening in the first place and promoting equality. Articles 5, 10–13 RED and Articles 7, 12–14 EED are key here. Chapter 6 looks at the role played in this context by state authorities, Equality Bodies, and civil society organizations. As well as the possibility of taking positive action, state authorities have an obligation to disseminate information and raise awareness about legal rights and existing redress mechanisms. Research shows that awareness-raising activities are superficial, insufficient, and are not considered to be high priority by the Member States. This is an unacceptable situation in light of the low level of awareness in particular of support structures in place in the different countries. The task is sometimes (by law or in practice) delegated to Equality Bodies, which also have to fulfil an advisory role to the government. In countries with a predominantly tribunal-type Equality Body, these bodies, faced with financial constraints, tend to prioritize their decision-making function. When it comes to the dialogue with civil society organizations, a state obligation under the Directives having the purpose of increasing the effectiveness of national policies and awareness raising, the research has shown that the opportunities for NGOs to engage in a constructive dialogue with state authorities and to be meaningfully involved in law and policy making are shrinking. The chapter closes with indicators to measure the level of implementation of the respective provisions of the Directives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document