Civil society organizations and deliberative policy making: interpreting environmental controversies in the deliberative system

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Dodge
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoljargal Dembereldorj

<p>This paper explains and examines the case of Mongolian civil society role by focusing on the issue of how and to what extent civil society organizations influenced on the current redistributive policy making in Mongolia. To explain this issue, the outside initiative model proposed by Cobb, Ross and Ross (1976) helps us to understand the influence of civil society organizations on policymakers and redistributive policy making. For the analysis, process tracing method was applied with over 80 Mongolian media sources. The findings suggest that Mongolian civil society organizations made significant influence on setting redistributive policy agenda with its rapid expansion and various pressure actions. </p>


Author(s):  
Natalia Garay ◽  
◽  
Santiago Leyva ◽  
Carolina Turriago ◽  
◽  
...  

This article explores the possibilities of network management to increase the capacity of business foundations to exert influence on the process of agenda-setting in public policies. This case illustrates how three foundations (Éxito Foundation, Alpina Foundation and ALAS Foundation) helped to coordinate one hundred civil society organizations to influence the Colombian National Development Plan (2018-2022). The case shows that business foundations can play an important role in setting the policy agenda by working as articulators of multiple fragmented actors of civil society. The article details the specific mechanisms used to pursue this articulation through the creation of a policy network known as NiñezYA. This in turn suggests that other foundations and NGOs could use the same strategies to increase their influence in policy making.


Author(s):  
О. А. Дмитренко ◽  

The issue of interaction of the non-governmental sector with state and local authorities always remains relevant, primarily due to changes in the dynamics and trends of this process. Today in Ukraine there is a wide range of interaction tools that can be used by both civil society organizations and individual citizens to communicate with the authorities. However, a characteristic feature of the non-governmental sector is not only the requirement of accountability on the part of the state, but also participation in the formation of a political course and roadmap in a given area. In this study, we analyzed how the third sector currently uses legally regulated methods of communication with the authorities to participate in policy-making and change.


2021 ◽  
pp. 357-414
Author(s):  
Emma Lantschner

Any attempt to address discrimination through litigation must be combined with efforts to prevent discrimination from happening in the first place and promoting equality. Articles 5, 10–13 RED and Articles 7, 12–14 EED are key here. Chapter 6 looks at the role played in this context by state authorities, Equality Bodies, and civil society organizations. As well as the possibility of taking positive action, state authorities have an obligation to disseminate information and raise awareness about legal rights and existing redress mechanisms. Research shows that awareness-raising activities are superficial, insufficient, and are not considered to be high priority by the Member States. This is an unacceptable situation in light of the low level of awareness in particular of support structures in place in the different countries. The task is sometimes (by law or in practice) delegated to Equality Bodies, which also have to fulfil an advisory role to the government. In countries with a predominantly tribunal-type Equality Body, these bodies, faced with financial constraints, tend to prioritize their decision-making function. When it comes to the dialogue with civil society organizations, a state obligation under the Directives having the purpose of increasing the effectiveness of national policies and awareness raising, the research has shown that the opportunities for NGOs to engage in a constructive dialogue with state authorities and to be meaningfully involved in law and policy making are shrinking. The chapter closes with indicators to measure the level of implementation of the respective provisions of the Directives.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 27-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolle Zeegers

Online consultations and the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) are tools that have been put into place by the European Union (EU) in order to increase the participation of citizens and Civil Society Organizations (CSO) in its politics and policy making. The current CSO representation at the system level of the EU is claimed to be biased in favor of the interests of economic producers and CSOs coming from old member states. The central question of this article is whether these tools help make participation more representative of the diversity of societal groups within the EU. The concept of ‘actor representativeness’ as well as ‘discourse representativeness’ will be applied in order to answer this question.


2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Morales ◽  
Luis Ramiro

This article analyzes the relevance of network embeddedness and social capital in allowing migrants' associations to gain political capital and access to policy making in the cities of Barcelona and Madrid. With data from a survey of migrants' associations in both locations, we examine the degree to which embeddedness in networks of links with other migrants' associations and with autochthonous Spanish civil society organizations are consequential for the inclusion of migrants' organizations in policy-making processes. The results show that migrants' organizational social capital is critical in facilitating their intermediation function vis à vis political institutions and decision makers, above and beyond their access to financial and human capital.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoljargal Dembereldorj

<p>This paper explains and examines the case of Mongolian civil society role by focusing on the issue of how and to what extent civil society organizations influenced on the current redistributive policy making in Mongolia. To explain this issue, the outside initiative model proposed by Cobb, Ross and Ross (1976) helps us to understand the influence of civil society organizations on policymakers and redistributive policy making. For the analysis, process tracing method was applied with over 80 Mongolian media sources. The findings suggest that Mongolian civil society organizations made significant influence on setting redistributive policy agenda with its rapid expansion and various pressure actions. </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document