Can Cellulose Beads Save The Circling of the Planets? Cellulose-Based Consolidating Filler to Stabilise Lifted Brittle Flakes on a Large Painting

Author(s):  
Karolina Soppa ◽  
Anita Hoess ◽  
Matthias Läuchli ◽  
Silja Meyer ◽  
Thomas Geiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Jean-Jacques Monsuez ◽  
Véronique François ◽  
Robert Ratiney ◽  
Isabelle Trinchet ◽  
Pierre Polomeni ◽  
...  

Anxiety and depressive symptoms are common in hospitalized patients. Arts and cultural programs were reported to enhance their quality of life. The Le Louvre à l’hôpital study presents a new approach in which the museum moves to the hospital by displaying and discussing artworks with patients interactively. Over one year, four large statues were disposed in the hospital gardens, 30 reprints of large painting were exhibited in the hospital hall, dining rooms, and circulations areas. A total of 83 small-group guided art discussions (90 min) were organized, which 451 patients attended. The 200 small-size reproductions of paintings placed in the patients’ rooms were chosen based on their individual preferences. Decreased anxiety after the art sessions was reported by 160 of 201 patients (79.6%). Out of 451 patients, 406 (90%) said the art program had met their expectations, and 372 (82.4%) wished to continue the experience with caregivers (162 paramedics trained for art activity during 66 workshops). In conclusion, moving the museum to the hospital constitutes a valuable way to provide art activities for inpatients in large numbers, which may reduce hospital-related anxiety in many instances.


2021 ◽  
pp. 481-487
Author(s):  
Bin Yang ◽  
Jianwu Chen ◽  
Menghui Xiao ◽  
Lindong Liu ◽  
Yanqiu Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1984 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-145
Author(s):  
Frans Baudouin

AbstractAttention is drawn to an unpublished oil sketch belonging to Mr. Guy Folkner of Brussels (Fig. 11), which is a modello for the signed painting by Thomas Willeboirts Bosschaert (1613/14-54) of Venus Lamenting Over Adonis in Jagdschloss Grunewald near Berlin (Fig. 2, Note 1). Another version, not signed and formerly attributed to Anthony van Dyck, is in the National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa (Fig. 3, Note 2). The pose of Adonis is derived from the figure of Christ in the central panel of Rubens' Descent from the Gross (1611-12) in Antwerp Cathedral (Fig. 4, Note 3) it should be noticed that the left arm of Adonis is a reverse rendering of the right arm of Christ (Fig. 5). However, the figures are treated by Willeboirts in the more elegant style of Van Dyck, the predominant influence on Flemish history painting shorty after 1640 or thereabouts. Two paintings by Willeboirts, ectch representing a different episode in the story of Venus and Adonis, are known to have belonged to the collections of the House of Orange: the Venus Lamenting Over Adonis now at Jagdschloss Crunewald and an Adonis Leaving Venus, formerly in the Mauritshuis in The Hague, which was destroyed by fire in 1940 in Middelburg, where it was on loan (Fig. 6). It is not easy to determine which of the two corresponds with the picture that Willeboirts painted for the Stadholder Frederick Henry in 1642 and which thus belonged to the first, commission received from him (Note 7), since in the documents concerned this is referred to only as Venus and Adonis. However, some characteristics of the painting formerly in the Mauritshuis are to be found in other works by Willeboits dating from 1646 and 1647 (Notes 20- 22) , so that it must have been done at about the same time as these. The painting at Grunewald may represent a somewhat early tage in his artistic evolution and might thus correspond with the one made for Frederick Henry in 1642. The discovery of this modello brings the number of known oil sketches by Willeboirts up to four, of which it is the earliest. The others are: a bozzetto in the Louvre for the large painting of The Princes Maurice and Frederick Henry on Horseback, commissioned by Amalia van Solms in 1649-50 for the Oranjezaal in the Huis ten Bosch (Note 24), a sketch for the large altarpiece of The Immaculata painted for the high altar of the church at Fuensaldana in 1652-4 and now in the Museo Nacional at Valladolid (Note 25), and an oil sketch in the Musée de Picardie at Amiens for The Assumption of the Virgin in the Church of Our Lady at Duffel (Note 26). A fifth sketch, a Venus and Adonis on paper belonging to the Earl of Wemyss (Note 27), proves to be the model for another Adonis Leaving Venus (Fig. 9), attributed to Willeboirts by Ludwig Burchard, which was on the art market in Berlin in 1930 (present whereabouts unknown). Here we see the same type of Venus as in, for example, The Toilet of Venus signed and dated 1644, which probably belonged to the House of Orange (Fig. 10, Note 29) and which came up at an auction in Stockholm in 1981. It seems likely that the paintings which Willeboirts and other Flemish painters made for the court in The Hague exerted some influence on Dutch painters active at the same period. Mythological pieces by Ferdinand Bol (Fig. 12, Note 45), Jacob Backer (Note 50), Caesar van Everdingen (Note 51) and others, in which a 'elassistic' tendency appears after about, 1650, do indeed show a rather similar elegant style and are characterized by the same idyllic mood. However, this is a matter which still requires further study.


1991 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liesbeth M. Helmus

AbstractThe two panels in the Rijksmuseum depicting the Saint r'lizabeth Flood, attributed to the Master of the Saint Elizabeth Panels, show the inundation which afflicted Dordrecht on the eve of Saint Elizabeth's Day, November 19 1421, the saint in question being Elizabeth of Hungary. The panels, which date from circa *1470, originally flanked an altarpiece, the middie section of which has been lost. When closed, they showcd Saint Elizabeth's Flood (figs. I and 2), and when opencd on high days, they revealed episodes from the life of Saint Elizabeth (figs. 3 and 4). Both wings have been sawn down the middle, halving their thickness and producing four panels. Notably in the figures, a stylistic difference can be observed between Saint Elizabeth's Flood and the scenes of the saints's life. A possible reason for the difference is that the painter was the inventor of the representation on the outside of the panels, whereas the scenes on what was originally the inside were based on iconographic types. Infra-red reflectographic examination leads to the deduction that he was the inventor. The montage shows a fluently rendered underdrawing beneath the landscape (fig.11). There are no people or animals in the underdrawing; they were only executed in paint. The staffage must therefore have been added later. This is not the method of an imitator, but is typical of the inventor. A second argument in favour of a single hand is the difference in importance of the inside and outside of the panels. Greater care may have been lavished on the inside of the altarpiece, which was only visible on holy days. Correspondences in the underdrawing on the original inside and outside also suggest one hand. It is of course conceivable tllat the actual painting was carried out by another artist from the same studio. The 1421 flood has been depicted several times. The renderings show either the moment at which the dike gave way at Wieldrecht (figs. 1 and 2, and figs. 8 and 9), or the situation after the breach, when large tracts of land were inundated (figs. 5, 6 and 7). Virtually all the representations identify the villagcs and rivers, sometimes adding an explanatory text. Such is the case with a hithertm unpublished copy on canvas (fig. 8), to which two cartouches have been added in the sky. The one on the left contains the chronogram 'WIELDRECHT MACH WATERS BECLAGHEN' (Wieldrecht suffering from water). The same text occurs on a panel of circa 1620, showing the local situation shortly after the dike burst (fig. 5). The Rijksmuseum's panels of Saint Elizabetb's Floud and scenes from the saint's life were taken from the Grote Kerk in Dordrecht to the militia headquarters at the St. Christoffel- or Heclhaaksdoelen in 1572 in the wake of the Reformation. Seventeenth-century inventories list 'd'lnundatie van Wieldrecht...'. The special relationship between Wieldrecht and the altar is illustrated by the following events. Those villagers of Wieldrecht who survived the flood moved to Dordrecht. In 1438 they went to the reeve to have a document drawn up regarding an altar which had been assigned to them by the churchwardens of the Grote Kerk. They had managed to save two bells and the font from their own church. In exchange for these they were given an altar dedicated to Saint Lambrecnt, set against a column on the south side of the church. An unpublished chronicle of Dordrecht, ascrihed to Cornelis van Someren, states that the Saint Lambrecht altar was 'furnished' with a large painting of the Flixabeth Flood. This .must have been the Saint Elizabeth's Flood which had been taken to the militia headquarters from the Grote Kerk after tbe Reformation and is now in the Rijksmuseum. The altarpiece must therefore have been donated by one or more Wieldrecht villagers. it was ordered in memory of the disaster which had struck the village and in gratitude to Saint Elizabeth for having rescued the survivors. The specific iconography is directly linked with these donor(s). It was at Wieldrecht that the dike gave way, and that is the exact moment depicted on the panels. In this context, thc chronogram and the emphasis on Wieldrecht in later descriptions of the panels are now understandable.


Traditio ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 311-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gino Casagrande ◽  
Christopher Kleinhenz

The medieval wall paintings of Longthorpe Tower (near Peterborough, England), discovered by fortunate accident over thirty years ago, have been the object of several critical investigations; because of their delicate and fragmentary condition, however, it has been impossible to arrive at an exact interpretation of the entire program. Two of these fourteenth-century paintings appear to treat the Seven Ages of Man and the Labors of the Months. Of particular interest is a third large painting (see plate), which depicts the wheel of the five senses. Much attention has been given to elucidating the significance of the five animals positioned on the rim of the wheel and to interpreting the meaning and function of the male figure who stands behind the wheel and appears to govern its motion. The problem of interpretation is not new. Indeed, the unknown artist provided a written guide to these wall paintings, but unfortunately the remnants of these inscriptions, found by the circumference and spokes of the wheel, are now indecipherable. Critics are in general agreement that the painting represents the five senses, and most cite the passage in Thomas of Cantimpré's Liber de natura rerum, which pairs specific animals with individual senses.


Zograf ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 143-156
Author(s):  
Maria Bormpoudaki

In the church of Saint George Sfakiotis, built on the outskirts of the settlement Diavaide in the Perfecture of Heraklion in Crete, narrative interest is focused on the large painting with the mounted figures of the military saints George and Demetrios. Saint George is shown together with the young pillion rider, whereas the element of water on the lower part of the scene establishes a connection between the episode of the slave?s release and a rarer variant according to which the liberator saint crosses the sea (?thalassoperatis?, trans. he who crosses the sea). The iconographic and stylistic analysis of the representation of Saint George as well that of Saint Demetrios at Diaviade reflects the artistic environment of the Eastern Mediterranean, possibly that of Cyprus, where images of equestrian military saints form part of the tradition of the island.


1970 ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Bente Gundestrup

The Eckhout-paintings and the Royal Danish Cabinet of Curiosities In the year 1654 the Dutch prince, John Maurice of Nassau-Siegen (1604–79), presented a gift consisting of 26 paintings to the Danish king, Frederik III (born 1609, reigned 1648–70). John Maurice of Nassau-Siegen had been governor of the then Dutch colony of Brazil from 1636–44. The Dutch artist Albert Eckhout (o.1610–1666), one of the many artists and scholars in John Maurice’s entourage, painted the canvases in Brazil in the 1640s.The paintings were probably placed in the Danish Royal Kunstkammer, which was founded by the King around 1650, in 1656. The Kunstkammer was initially established in the old Castle of Copenhagen. In one of the nine rooms, walls and ceiling were decorated with the Brazilian paintings. Eight large and three smaller paintings depicting different types of people from Brazil and Africa and twelve smaller ones of exotic fruits and plants were hung on the walls. A large painting of dancing Indians hung from the ceiling. Later a special building for the royal collections was erected next to the King’s residence. The Eckhout paintings with the rest of the kunstkammer collection were transferred to the new premises and were exhibited in The Indian Chamber and in The Gallery. Two of the paintings were lost before 1794.The Royal Kunstkammer existed officially until 1825, when the bulk of the objects were dispersed to newly established specialist museums. The surviving paintings were also dispersed, the greater part first exhibited in the Portrait Gallery at Frederiksborg Castle, were transferred in 1848 to the Royal Ethnographical Museum, now the National Museum of Denmark. Three of the paintings went to the Royal Picture Gallery, now the Museum of Fine Arts. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document