Online Assessment of Belief Biases and Their Impact on the Acceptance of Fallacious Reasoning

Author(s):  
Nicholas Diana ◽  
John Stamper ◽  
Kenneth Koedinger
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Jian Xu ◽  
Boyu Xie ◽  
Siyang Liao ◽  
Yuanzhang Sun ◽  
Deping Ke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 7469
Author(s):  
Gratiela Dana Boca

Universities around the world have faced a new pandemic, forcing the closure of campuses that are now conducting educational activities on online platforms. The paper presents a survey about students behavior and attitudes towards online education in the pandemic period from the Technical University of Cluj Napoca, Romania. A group of 300 students participated. The questionnaire was structured in four parts to determine student’s individual characteristics, student’s needs, students’ knowledge in using virtual platforms and students’ quality preferences for online education. The students said that online education in a pandemic situation is beneficial for 78% of them. A total of 41.7% percent of students appreciated the teachers’ teaching skills and the quality of online courses since the beginning of the pandemic, and 18.7% percent of the students appreciated the additional online materials for study to support their education. However, students found online education stressful, but preferred online assessment for evaluation. This pandemic has led to the new stage of Education 4.0, online education, and the need to harmonize methods of education with the requirements of new generations.


2021 ◽  
pp. 104346312110336
Author(s):  
Lucie Vrbová ◽  
Kateřina Jiřinová ◽  
Karel Helman ◽  
Hana Lorencová

Informal reasoning fallacies belong to a persuasive tactic, leading to a conclusion that is not supported by premises but reached through emotions and/or misleading and incomplete information. Previous research focused on the ability to recognize informal reasoning fallacies. However, the recognition itself does not necessarily mean immunity to their influence on decisions made. An experiment was designed to study the relationship between the presence of informal reasoning fallacies and a consequent decision. Having conducted paired comparisons of distributions, we have found some support for the hypothesis that informal reasoning fallacies affect decision-making more substantially than non-fallacious reasoning—strong support in the case of a slippery slope, weak in that of appeal to fear, anecdotal evidence argument defying evaluation. Numeracy and cognitive reflection seem to be associated with higher resistance to the slippery slope, but do not diminish appeal to fear.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 100556
Author(s):  
Mahsa Madani Hosseini ◽  
Gunawardena Egodawatte ◽  
Nursel Selver Ruzgar
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgitta Salmela ◽  
Lotta Joutsi-Korhonen ◽  
Elina Armstrong ◽  
Riitta Lassila

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document