scholarly journals Classification of Handwritten Drawings of People with Parkinson’s Disease by Using Histograms of Oriented Gradients and the Random Forest Classifier

Author(s):  
João Paulo Folador ◽  
Adrian Rosebrock ◽  
Adriano Alves Pereira ◽  
Marcus Fraga Vieira ◽  
Adriano de Oliveira Andrade
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil J. Dhinagar ◽  
Sophia I. Thomopoulos ◽  
Conor Owens-Walton ◽  
Dimitris Stripelis ◽  
Jose-Luis Ambite ◽  
...  

Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are progressive neurodegenerative disorders that affect millions of people worldwide. In this work, we propose a deep learning approach to classify these diseases based on 3D T1-weighted brain MRI. We analyzed several datasets including the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI), an independent dataset from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (UPenn), the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), and the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS) dataset. PPMI and ADNI were partitioned to train (70%), validate (20%), and test (10%) a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) for PD and AD classification. The UPenn and OASIS datasets were used as independent test sets to evaluate the model performance during inference. We also implemented a random forest classifier as a baseline model by extracting key radiomics features from the same T1-weighted MRI scans. The proposed 3D CNN model was trained from scratch for the classification tasks. For AD classification, the 3D CNN model achieved an ROC-AUC of 0.878 on the ADNI test set and an average ROC-AUC of 0.789 on the OASIS dataset. For PD classification, the proposed 3D CNN model achieved an ROC-AUC of 0.667 on the PPMI test set and an average ROC-AUC of 0.743 on the UPenn dataset. We also found that model performance was largely maintained when using only 25% of the training dataset. The 3D CNN outperformed the random forest classifier for both the PD and AD tasks. The 3D CNN also generalized better on unseen MRI data from different imaging centers. Our results show that the proposed 3D CNN model was less prone to overfitting for AD than for PD classification. This approach shows promise for screening of PD and AD patients using only T1-weighted brain MRI, which is relatively widely available. This model with additional validation could also be used to help differentiate between challenging cases of AD and PD when they present with similarly subtle motor and non-motor symptoms.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 508-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guan‐Hua Huang ◽  
Chih‐Hsuan Lin ◽  
Yu‐Ren Cai ◽  
Tai‐Been Chen ◽  
Shih‐Yen Hsu ◽  
...  

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3553
Author(s):  
Jeremy Watts ◽  
Anahita Khojandi ◽  
Rama Vasudevan ◽  
Fatta B. Nahab ◽  
Ritesh A. Ramdhani

Parkinson’s disease medication treatment planning is generally based on subjective data obtained through clinical, physician-patient interactions. The Personal KinetiGraph™ (PKG) and similar wearable sensors have shown promise in enabling objective, continuous remote health monitoring for Parkinson’s patients. In this proof-of-concept study, we propose to use objective sensor data from the PKG and apply machine learning to cluster patients based on levodopa regimens and response. The resulting clusters are then used to enhance treatment planning by providing improved initial treatment estimates to supplement a physician’s initial assessment. We apply k-means clustering to a dataset of within-subject Parkinson’s medication changes—clinically assessed by the MDS-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale-III (MDS-UPDRS-III) and the PKG sensor for movement staging. A random forest classification model was then used to predict patients’ cluster allocation based on their respective demographic information, MDS-UPDRS-III scores, and PKG time-series data. Clinically relevant clusters were partitioned by levodopa dose, medication administration frequency, and total levodopa equivalent daily dose—with the PKG providing similar symptomatic assessments to physician MDS-UPDRS-III scores. A random forest classifier trained on demographic information, MDS-UPDRS-III scores, and PKG time-series data was able to accurately classify subjects of the two most demographically similar clusters with an accuracy of 86.9%, an F1 score of 90.7%, and an AUC of 0.871. A model that relied solely on demographic information and PKG time-series data provided the next best performance with an accuracy of 83.8%, an F1 score of 88.5%, and an AUC of 0.831, hence further enabling fully remote assessments. These computational methods demonstrate the feasibility of using sensor-based data to cluster patients based on their medication responses with further potential to assist with medication recommendations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Kuhner ◽  
Tobias Schubert ◽  
Massimo Cenciarini ◽  
Isabella Katharina Wiesmeier ◽  
Volker Arnd Coenen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Watts ◽  
Anahita Khojandi ◽  
Rama Vasudevan ◽  
Fatta B. Nahab ◽  
Ritesh Ramdhani

Abstract Parkinson’s disease (PD) medication treatment planning is generally based on subjective data through in-office, physicianpatient interactions. The Personal KinetiGraphTM (PKG) has shown promise in enabling objective, continuous remote health monitoring for Parkinson’s patients. In this proof-of-concept study, we propose to use objective sensor data from the PKG and apply machine learning to subtype patients based on levodopa regimens and response. We apply k-means clustering to a dataset of with-in-subject Parkinson’s medication changes—clinically assessed by the PKG and Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) staging. A random forest classification model was then used to predict patients’ cluster allocation based on their respective PKG data and demographic information. Clinically relevant clusters were developed based on longitudinal dopaminergic regimens—partitioned by levodopa dose, administration frequency, and total levodopa equivalent daily dose—with the PKG increasing cluster granularity compared to the H&Y staging. A random forest classifier was able to accurately classify subjects of the two most demographically similar clusters with an accuracy of 87:9 ±1:3


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil J. Dhinagar ◽  
Sophia I. Thomopoulos ◽  
Conor Owens-Walton ◽  
Dimitris Stripelis ◽  
Jose Luis Ambite ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document