Understanding Adverse Effects in Gang-Focused Interventions: A Critical Review

Author(s):  
Miriam Rubenson ◽  
Katharine Galbraith ◽  
Stanley J. Huey
Author(s):  
Martin Brtnicky ◽  
Rahul Datta ◽  
Jiri Holatko ◽  
Lucie Bielska ◽  
Zygmunt M. Gusiatin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. flgastro-2019-101386
Author(s):  
Anjan Dhar ◽  
Frances Maw ◽  
Helen Jane Dallal ◽  
Stephen Attwood

The two main drugs used in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists and both these agents have been implicated in a number of adverse effects, leading to considerable controversies related to their long-term use. This paper is aimed at a critical review of the published literature and the clinical significance of these reported side effects, most of which are associations rather than causal.


Epilepsia ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 570-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. P. Deckers ◽  
Y. A. Hekster ◽  
A. Keyser ◽  
H. Meinardi ◽  
W. O. Renier

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 406-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Yokel ◽  
Salik Hussain ◽  
Stavros Garantziotis ◽  
Philip Demokritou ◽  
Vincent Castranova ◽  
...  

This critical review identifies nanoceria's pharmacokinetics and adverse effects, discloses uncertainties and unknowns, and makes recommendations to address research gaps.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Nilsen ◽  
Kelly L. Smalling ◽  
Lutz Ahrens ◽  
Meritxell Gros ◽  
Karina S.B. Miglioranza ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 1225-1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Pletz ◽  
Steven J. Enoch ◽  
Diviya M. Jais ◽  
Claire L. Mellor ◽  
Gopal Pawar ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denys Fontaine ◽  
Clement Hamani ◽  
Andres Lozano

Object The authors systematically reviewed the published literature to evaluate the efficacy of and adverse effects after motor cortex stimulation (MCS) for chronic neuropathic pain. Methods A search of the PubMed database (1991–2006) using the key words “motor cortex,” “stimulation,” and “pain” yielded 244 articles. Only original nonduplicated articles were selected for further analysis; 14 studies were identified for critical review. All were series of cases and none was controlled. The outcomes in 210 patients were assessed and expressed as the percentage of patients that improved with the procedure. Results A good response to MCS (pain relief ≥ 40–50%) was observed in ~ 55% of patients who underwent surgery and in 45% of the 152 patients with a postoperative follow-up ≥ 1 year. Visual analog scale scores were provided in 76 patients, revealing an average 57% improvement in the 41 responders. A good response was achieved in 54% of the 117 patients with central pain and 68% of the 44 patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain. Adverse effects were reported in 10 studies, including 157 patients. Infections (5.7%) and hardware-related problems (5.1%) were relatively common complications. Seizures occurred in 19 patients (12%) in the early postoperative period, but no chronic epilepsy was reported. Conclusions The results of the authors' review of the literature suggest that MCS is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. Results must be considered with caution, however, as none of the trials were blinded or controlled. Studies with a better design are mandatory to confirm the efficacy of MCS for chronic neuropathic pain.


Author(s):  
Nestor J. Zaluzec

The application of electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) to light element analysis is rapidly becoming an important aspect of the microcharacterization of solids in materials science, however relatively stringent requirements exist on the specimen thickness under which one can obtain EELS data due to the adverse effects of multiple inelastic scattering.1,2 This study was initiated to determine the limitations on quantitative analysis of EELS data due to specimen thickness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document