scholarly journals Assessing Academic Careers: The Peer Review of Professorial Candidates

2022 ◽  
pp. 347-370
Author(s):  
Björn Hammarfelt
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Academic Careers

AbstractThe reputation of an academic is dependent on their recognition among a wider community of peers, which means that the research field, rather than the institution, is the venue where careers are valued. This chapter looks at discipline specific practices for evaluating publications oeuvres in three fields; biomedicine, economics and history. The material consists of reports, written by independent referees, commissioned by Swedish universities when hiring for new professors. The approach is to study how ‘value’ is enacted with special attention to the kind of tools—judgements, indicators and metrics—that are used. The chapter concludes by relating the findings to a broader context of how academics are assessed, and the implications that such practices may have for knowledge production and careers are discussed.

Academic knowledge production and prefigurative politics

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (267-268) ◽  
pp. 163-167
Author(s):  
Beatriz P. Lorente
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Structural Characteristic ◽  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Academic Knowledge ◽  
Means And Ends ◽  
Sociology Of Language ◽  
Prefigurative Politics ◽  
Access Model

Abstract Inequality is the pervasive structural characteristic of academic knowledge production. To dismantle this inequality, the challenge raised by prefigurative politics which is based on an ethos of congruence between means and ends must be taken up by the International Journal of the Sociology of Language. The IJSL’s peer review process, its academic conventions and its access model can potentially be spaces for concrete practices that prefigure parity in academic knowledge production.

scholarly journals Indigenous Knowledges and Scholarly Publishing

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-40
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Boyd
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Sound Source ◽  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
White Male ◽  
Scholarly Publishing ◽  
Editorial Process ◽  
Academic Knowledge ◽  
Intended Purpose ◽  
Peer Reviewers

At its core, academic knowledge production is predicated on Western notions of knowledge historically grounded in a Euro-American, White, male worldview. As a component of academic knowledge production, scholarly publishing shares the same basis of Whiteness. It excludes knowledge that doesn’t conform to White, Western notions of knowledge, forces conformity to (and therefore reinforcement of) a Western standard of writing/knowledge, and leads to a reverence of peer-reviewed literature as the only sound source of knowledge. As a tool of scholarly publishing and the editorial process, blind peer review, though perhaps well-intentioned, is fraught with problems, especially for BIPOC researchers and writers, because it fails in its intended purpose to drastically reduce or eliminate bias and racism in the peer review and editorial processes; shields peer reviewers and editors against accusations of bias, racism, or conflicts of interest; and robs BIPOC, and particularly Indigenous, writers and researchers from having the opportunity to develop relationships with those that are reviewing and publishing their work.

scholarly journals A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolás Contreras-Barraza ◽  
Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia ◽  
Guido Salazar-Sepulveda ◽  
Alejandro Vega-Muñoz ◽  
Antonio Ariza-Montes
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Robust Approach ◽  
Research Organizations ◽  
Level Of Knowledge ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Amount Of Knowledge ◽  
Scientometric Study

This article presents a scientometric study regarding entrepreneurship and its relationship with wellbeing. The study presents a systematic review and measures impact and relational character to identify the relevance of countries, research organizations, and authors in the field of entrepreneurial wellbeing. The study poses the following research questions: What is the nature of the evolution of scientific knowledge in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What is the nature of the concentration in terms of geographical distribution and co-authorship level of knowledge production in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What are the knowledge trends in knowledge production for entrepreneurial wellbeing literature? The contribution of this research is two-fold. First, in terms of methodology, it contributes study into the use of a more robust approach to search for the scientometric trends about entrepreneurship wellbeing in addition to the PRISMA review tools and the PICOS eligibility criteria. Secondly, the study presents research updates in the search for results for the last 2 years of knowledge production. This upgrade is particularly important in a research field that presents exponential growth, where 2019 and 2020 presented almost double the amount of knowledge production compared to 2017 and 2018.

scholarly journals Controvérsias sobre Redes Abertas de Produção de Conhecimento e de Comunicação Científica │ Controversies on Knowledge Production and Scientific Communication Open Networks

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiana Soares de Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Scientific Communication ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Peer Review System ◽  
Review System ◽  
Open Networks ◽  
Communication Processes ◽  
Central Elements

RESUMO O objetivo do artigo é analisar questões centrais associadas ao conceito de ciência aberta na sociedade contemporânea, evidenciando características  de modos distintos de produção de conhecimento. Processos de comunicação científica  são discutidos, com foco em  temas como o sistema aberto de revisão por pares, direitos autorais e domínio público, concluindo com uma reflexão crítica a respeito das possibilidades de transformação das características tradicionais do campo de produção de conhecimento a partir da adoção de normas e práticas desenvolvidas em redes de ciência aberta.Palavras-chave: Ciência Aberta; Conhecimento Compartilhado; Processos de Avaliação; Direitos Autorais; Comunicação Científica.ABSTRACT This article aims at discussing central elements associated to the concept of  open science in contemporary societies, pointing out some characteristics that can be associated to distinct modes of knowledge production. Scientific communication processes are discussed, focusing on issues such as the open peer review system, copyright and public domain, concluding with critical considerations about the possibilities of transforming traditional characteristics of the knowledge production field through the adoption of norms and practices developed in open science networks.Keywords: Open Science; Knowledge Sharing; Evaluation Processes; Copyright; Scientific Communication.

Sustainability Sciences

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valdir Fernandes ◽  
Arlindo Philippi Jr.
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Historical Development ◽  
Social Process ◽  
Environmental Issues ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Political Movement ◽  
Political Issues ◽  
Cultural Traditions ◽  
Universal Healthcare ◽  
Development Agendas

The concept of sustainability refers to the human awakening about the finite nature of natural resources. Occurring as a political and social process, sustainability placed on development agendas the discussion about the limitations on the biosphere to sustain economic growth; access to basic conditions of universal healthcare and education; and the threat posed to ancient cultural traditions. This process led to the creation of an interdisciplinary research field with transdisciplinary impacts. This chapter, “Sustainability Sciences: Political and Epistemological Approaches,” discusses the challenges of knowledge production in this field as well as its historical development alongside environmental and political issues. The discussion is established from the historical development of environmental issues and the international political movement that culminated in the perspective of sustainability; of the evolution of sustainability as a scientific research field; and finally from the political and epistemological aspects that shape the sustainability sciences.

scholarly journals DOHaD in science and society: emergent opportunities and novel responsibilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Penkler ◽  
M. Hanson ◽  
R. Biesma ◽  
R. Müller
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Life Experiences ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Science And Society ◽  
Social Responsibilities ◽  
Robust Implementation ◽  
Scientific Knowledge Production ◽  
Key Characteristics ◽  
Health And Disease ◽  
Disease Risks

AbstractThe field of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) has grown considerably in recent decades and is receiving increasing recognition from health policymakers. Today, DOHaD research aims to offer a comprehensive perspective on health and disease that traces how different life experiences shape health and disease risks over the entire life course. This integrative perspective opens up distinct possibilities for improving health. At the same time, it raises questions regarding the specific social responsibilities of DOHaD as a field and about possible pathways to a socially just and scientifically robust implementation of DOHaD knowledge in society. In this article, we review the history and key characteristics of DOHaD as a field of scientific knowledge production. We argue that based on its key assumptions – that life circumstances, health and disease are closely linked on a molecular scale – DOHaD is an inherently political research field. When tracing how life environments affect health and disease, it is of utmost social and political importance to specify how DOHaD understands and frames these life environments, which aspects of life worlds are included and which excluded, and how research results are interpreted and translated into health recommendations at individual, societal and policy levels. We suggest a number of ways by which the DOHaD community can constructively and responsibly meet the demands that these inherent characteristics place on knowledge production and dissemination in the field.

scholarly journals Research on esotericism in Scandinavia

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 38-49
Author(s):  
Henrik Bogdan ◽  
Olav Hammer
Keyword(s):  
Present Article ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Research Field ◽  
The State ◽  
Academic Careers ◽  
The Other ◽  
Scandinavian Language ◽  
Western Esotericism ◽  
Language Literature

The title of this paper can be understood in two senses. In the sense of ‘research on esotericism carried out by Scandinavian scholars’, the field is blossoming. Several dozen individuals, at various points in their academic careers, are pursuing research on some aspect of Western esotericism however the concept is defined. In the other conceivable sense, ‘research on Scandinavian esotericism’, the availability of academic studies is generally more limited. The purpose of the present article is to survey the state of the art of this research field, especially pertaining to esotericism in Sweden (the country we are most familiar with), and to provide a rough map of the Scandinavian-language literature, especially for the benefit of non-Scandinavian readers.

scholarly journals A Century of Nonprofit Studies: Scaling the Knowledge of the Field

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Ma ◽  
Sara Konrath
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Study ◽  
Cultural Diversity ◽  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Core Theme ◽  
Nonprofit Studies ◽  
Quantitative Results ◽  
Unique Core ◽  
Critical Challenge

This empirical study examines knowledge production between 1925 and 2015 in nonprofit and philanthropic studies from quantitative and thematic perspectives. Quantitative results suggest that scholars in this field have been actively generating a considerable amount of literature and a solid intellectual base for developing this field toward a new discipline. Thematic analyses suggest that knowledge production in this field is also growing in cohesion—several main themes have been formed and actively advanced since 1980s, and the study of volunteering can be identified as a unique core theme of this field. The lack of geographic and cultural diversity is a critical challenge for advancing nonprofit studies. New paradigms are needed for developing this research field and mitigating the tension between academia and practice. Methodological and pedagogical implications, limitations, and future studies are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document