Groundwater Treatment Plants as a Sustainable Source of Iron-Containing Nanopowders

2021 ◽  
pp. 525-535
Author(s):  
Lev Maksimov ◽  
Rowan Baker ◽  
Ruslan Safargaliev ◽  
Svetlana Maksimova ◽  
Viktor Mironov
2021 ◽  
pp. 125995
Author(s):  
So Yeon Yoon ◽  
Seok Byum Jang ◽  
Kien Tiek Wong ◽  
Hyeseong Kim ◽  
Min Ji Kim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dana A. Da’ana ◽  
Nabil Zouari ◽  
Mohammad Y. Ashfaq ◽  
Mohammed Abu-Dieyeh ◽  
Majeda Khraisheh ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose of Review This paper reviews various low-cost treatment techniques such as adsorption, permeable reactive barrier, and biological techniques for the simultaneous removal of chemical and microbial contaminants from groundwater and discusses treatment mechanisms of different treatment techniques. This paper also discusses the challenges of groundwater treatment, how to choose the appropriate treatment technique, and cost analysis of groundwater treatment. Recent Findings Various treatment technologies have been used for the treatment of groundwater: physical, chemical, and biological technologies with different success rates. In the literature, various adsorbents have been successfully synthesized from low-cost and environmentally friendly materials. Adsorption is considered an efficient treatment technique for the removal of both toxic elements and pathogens by utilizing different adsorbents. For example, the nanostructures of MgO with a BET surface area of up to 171 m2/g obtained a very high adsorption capacity of 29,131 mg/g for fluoride ions in water, while the incorporation of iron in activated carbon has improved its adsorption capacity to 51.3 mg/g for arsenic. Moreover, certain adsorbents have shown the capability to remove 99% of the rotavirus and adenovirus from groundwater. Summary Groundwater resources are contaminated with toxic metals and pathogens. Therefore, water treatment technologies should be evaluated for their efficiency to remove such contaminants. Determination of the most cost-effective and efficient treatment technique is not an easy task and requires the understanding of various aspects such as the contaminants present in water, the reuse options considered, and cost analysis of the treatment technique.


2014 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 70-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alar Jantsikene ◽  
Madis Kiisk ◽  
Siiri Suursoo ◽  
Rein Koch ◽  
Liie Lumiste

2015 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 654-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun feng Su ◽  
Sheng Chen Zheng ◽  
Ting lin Huang ◽  
Fang Ma ◽  
Si Cheng Shao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 120067
Author(s):  
Danting Shi ◽  
Fanxi Zeng ◽  
Tengjing Gong ◽  
Jiangyun Li ◽  
Senlin Shao

Author(s):  
Zh Govorova ◽  
V Semenovykh ◽  
V Medvedeva

2017 ◽  
Vol 587-588 ◽  
pp. 371-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Banning ◽  
Nadine Pawletko ◽  
Julia Röder ◽  
Christine Kübeck ◽  
Frank Wisotzky

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Setyo Budi Kurniawan ◽  
Ipung Fitri Purwanti ◽  
Bieby Voijant Tangahu ◽  
Harmin Sulistyaning Titah ◽  
Sarwoko Mangkoedihardjo

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branislava M. Lekić ◽  
Dana D. Marković ◽  
Vladana N. Rajaković-Ognjanović ◽  
Aleksandar R. Đukić ◽  
Ljubinka V. Rajaković

In this study, removal of arsenic ions using two industrial by-products as adsorbents is represented. Removal of As(III) and As(V) from water was carried out with industrial by-products: residual from the groundwater treatment process, iron-manganese oxide coated sand (IMOCS), and blast furnace slag from steel production (BFS), both inexpensive and locally available. In addition, the BFS was modified in order to minimise its deteriorating impact on the initial water quality. Kinetic and equilibrium studies were carried out using batch and fixed-bed column adsorption techniques under the conditions that are likely to occur in real water treatment systems. To evaluate the application for real groundwater treatment, the capacities of the selected materials were further compared to those exhibited by commercial sorbents, which were examined under the same experimental conditions. IMOCS was found to be a good and inexpensive sorbent for arsenic, while BFS and modified slag showed the highest affinity towards arsenic. All examined waste materials exhibited better sorption performances for As(V). The maximum sorption capacity in the batch reactor was obtained for blast furnace slag, 4040 μgAs(V)/g.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document