scholarly journals Going Beyond GDP to Nowcast Well-Being Using Retail Market Data

2016 ◽  
pp. 29-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Guidotti ◽  
Michele Coscia ◽  
Dino Pedreschi ◽  
Diego Pennacchioli
Keyword(s):  
Well Being ◽  
Retail Market ◽  
Market Data ◽  
Beyond Gdp

Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare. Part I

2012 ◽  
pp. 67-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fleurbaey
Keyword(s):  
Economic Theory ◽  
Social Welfare ◽  
Well Being ◽  
National Product ◽  
Future Generations ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
Aggregate Wealth ◽  
Net National Product ◽  
Sustainability Policy ◽  
Beyond Gdp

The first part of the paper is devoted to the monetary indicators of social welfare. It is shown which methods of quantitative estimating the aggregate wealth and well-being are available in the modern economic theory apart from the traditional GDP measure. The limitations of the methods are also discussed. The author shows which measures of welfare are adequate in the dynamic context: he considers the problems of intertemporal welfare analysis using the Net National Product (NNP) for the sustainability policy and in the context of concern for well-being of the future generations.

Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare. Part II

2012 ◽  
pp. 32-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fleurbaey
Keyword(s):  
Social Welfare ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Welfare Economics ◽  
Subjective Well Being ◽  
Alternative Approaches ◽  
Micro Level ◽  
Beyond Gdp

The second part of the paper is devoted to the non-monetary indicators of social welfare. Various approaches to the study of subjective well-being and happiness are described. The author shows what problems a researcher would encounter trying to analyze welfare on the micro-level and to take account of the cognitive and affective aspects of the individuals assessment of their well-being, as well as the relevance of social relations. The author also shows to what extent the alternative approaches, particularly the analysis of functionings and capabilities advanced by A. Sen are compatible to the modern welfare economics and what prospects the latter has.

“Beyond GDP” Effects on National Subjective Well-Being of OECD Countries

2016 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 931-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Cavalletti ◽  
Matteo Corsi
Keyword(s):  
Well Being ◽  
Oecd Countries ◽  
Subjective Well Being ◽  
Beyond Gdp

scholarly journals Beyond GDP? Welfare across Countries and Time

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (9) ◽  
pp. 2426-2457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles I. Jones ◽  
Peter J. Klenow
Keyword(s):  
Western Europe ◽  
Well Being ◽  
The United States ◽  
Gdp Per Capita ◽  
Summary Statistic ◽  
Micro Data ◽  
Per Capita ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
Beyond Gdp ◽  
Economic Well Being

We propose a summary statistic for the economic well-being of people in a country. Our measure incorporates consumption, leisure, mortality, and inequality, first for a narrow set of countries using detailed micro data, and then more broadly using multi-country datasets. While welfare is highly correlated with GDP per capita, deviations are often large. Western Europe looks considerably closer to the United States, emerging Asia has not caught up as much, and many developing countries are further behind. Each component we introduce plays a significant role in accounting for these differences, with mortality being most important. (JEL D63, E21, E23, E24, I12, O57)

Measuring Progress Beyond GDP: A Theoretical Perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-165
Author(s):  
V. K. Shrotryia ◽  
Shashank Vikram Pratap Singh
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Perspective ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Inclusive Development ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Development Policies ◽  
Universal Indicator ◽  
Social Environmental ◽  
Beyond Gdp ◽  
Critical Aspects

Inclusive development policies and comprehensive strategies are extremely critical aspects of the holistic progress of a nation. The measurement of considerable progress through the indicator/indicators is equally important. What if the selected indicator(s) are inappropriate? It can mislead people and policymakers. That is exactly what is happening to gross domestic product (GDP) as an indicator for measuring the overall progress of any nation. Through this academic article, an attempt has been made to address the following questions. Why do social, environmental, and human-centric indictors reveal an altogether different position concerning the health of the economy? Are we making deliberate mistakes while considering GDP as a gospel indicator for each and everything? Does it reflect the welfare aspects of human beings? Does it accurately reflect the well-being of people? The prolonged followed GDP-driven policies are inadequate for measuring the overall progress of a nation. The progress of a nation cannot be accurately reflected through GDP as an indicator. After an extensive review, the authors found that GDP was intentionally developed for measuring only economic activities which cannot be equated with social or human well-being. The possible outcomes of GDP-driven policies have been reflected through various human, social, and environment-centric indicators, which thoughtfully provide ample grounding to authors to fulminate against the philosophical notion of GDP as a universal indicator for measuring overall national progress/human well-being. This article can add to the literature of “why happiness movement.” This article can provide sufficient theoretical grounds to move beyond GDP and look for some other holistic indicator(s).

scholarly journals Beyond GDP: Using Equivalent Incomes to Measure Well-Being in Europe

2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koen Decancq ◽  
Erik Schokkaert
Keyword(s):  
Well Being ◽  
Beyond Gdp
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document