Building Capacity: Professional Development and Collaborative Learning About Assessment

Author(s):  
Dany Laveault
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Василевская ◽  
E. Vasilevskaya

The paper considers the network approach to improving professional competency of teachers, as well as the network approach to the students’ personal and professional development, concerning means of collaborative learning.


2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
ERIC D. HOCHBERG ◽  
LAURA M. DESIMONE

Author(s):  
Bob Zimmer

This chapter shows how the interpersonal action-learning cycle (IALC) can be used to invite thinking and attentive comprehension from learners in conversation. It explains what the IALC is, where it comes from, how it works and why. In particular, it offers a logical demonstration that all interpersonal learning takes place within the IALC, and that all competition for dominance lies outside it – suggesting conscious use of the IALC as a desirable practice. The chapter goes on to explore linguistic factors that routinely disrupt use of the IALC, and that can hide its very existence. Strategies for restoring and stabilizing it are offered. Routine use of the IALC can have profound implications for teaching and instruction, collaborative learning, assessment, course evaluation and professional development. These are explored.


Author(s):  
Janet Mosher ◽  
Uzo Anucha ◽  
Henry Appiah ◽  
Sue Levesque

Integral to both knowledge mobilization and action research is the idea that research can and should ignite change or action. Change or action may occur at multiple levels and scales, in direct and predictable ways and in indirect and highly unpredictable ways. To better understand the relationship between research and action or change, we delineate four conceptualizations that appear in the literature. Reflecting on our experiences as collaborators in a community–university action research project that set out to tackle a “wicked” social problem, we consider the implications of these conceptualizations for the project’s knowledge mobilization plans and activities. The major lessons point to the importance of building capacity by nurturing collaborative learning spaces, of drawing many others – situated differently and with varied perspectives – into dialogue, and of embracing change within the project itself.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-66
Author(s):  
Karen Joy Haines

This article outlines how a tertiary institution designed professional development, during the first year of a long-term building initiative, to support teachers moving into new collaborative learning spaces. The Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) is used to reflect on professional development strategies employed to support teachers into using new classroom spaces. The stages of the CBAM were useful in considering the value of resources created for teacher development. The paper concludes with a discussion as to how effective the model proved to be in relation to teachers’ expressed concerns, and suggests expanding the CBAM parameters to reflect the complexity of professional development design for next-generation learning spaces.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Halford

This report aims to explore how HEED approached and delivered capacity building for the research team, project partners and the communities the team worked within Rwanda and Nepal. This report's purpose is threefold: first, to be evidential on how HEED planned, delivered and captured impact around capacity building so similar projects can develop best practice when skills development is a key deliverable. Second, to encourage other energy projects to document the impact produced by researchers and practitioners' involvement while working with communities. Therefore, to recognise the tacit and dynamic aspects of knowledge production, not only the more explicit aspects. Third, suggest recommendations to support a skills-led approach to capacity building that provides personal and professional development opportunities to deepen knowledge production and impact.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-427
Author(s):  
Philip J. Landrigan ◽  
Joseph M. Braun ◽  
Ellen F. Crain ◽  
Joel Forman ◽  
Maida Galvez ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
pp. 1339-1347
Author(s):  
Tony Day

The need for the development of an online learning community for professional development and support for new and experienced educators is growing due to the significant turnover of teachers within the first five years (National Center for Teaching and America’s Future, 2003). This trend is also present in other countries: England has a turnover rate of teachers at 18% in the first three years (Hayes, 2004), and Australia, especially in the New South Wales area, has a rate of between 20% and 50% within the first three to five years (Manuel, 2003). This challenge would be best met through the online collaborative learning model allowing for the development of outside resources without the excessive cost of the educator’s most valuable commodity: time. This process is especially valuable for the utilization of comparative education issues between cooperating countries as it will lend itself to the collegiality of educators across countries and cultures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document