8 The Role of Temporal Construal in Online Privacy Behaviors

2018 ◽  
pp. 199-207
Author(s):  
Johannes Ullrich
Keyword(s):  
Online Privacy ◽  
Temporal Construal ◽  
Privacy Behaviors

scholarly journals Children and Online Privacy Protection: Empowerment from Cognitive Defense Strategies

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Craig Andrews ◽  
Kristen L. Walker ◽  
Jeremy Kees
Keyword(s):  
Private Information ◽  
Parental Influence ◽  
Online Privacy ◽  
State Agencies ◽  
Educational Video ◽  
Defense Strategies ◽  
Education Campaigns ◽  
Defense Research ◽  
Limit Access

At present, very little is known about what might encourage children and teens to limit access to their private information online and to restrict what they share on social media and video sites. Federal and state agencies face challenges encouraging companies to help children, teens, and parents protect their information online. The authors extend previous cognitive defense research by examining (1) effects beyond advertising as applied to information privacy online; (2) not only children’s/teens’ beliefs and knowledge, but also their online privacy decisions; (3) multiple age categories; (4) multiple cognitive defense strategies (educational video, quiz with feedback, or absence of a strategy); and (5) children’s/teens’ motivation to restrict what they share online. Key results indicate significant effects of the quiz and educational video over the absence of a strategy in enhancing favorable online safety beliefs and in restricting online sharing. Findings also demonstrate the role of perceived parental influence and for agencies to offer privacy education campaigns to help empower children to protect their privacy. Implications for policy and privacy research are discussed.

Parental Mediation Strategies and Their Role on Youths’ Online Privacy Disclosure and Protection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Grazia Lo Cricchio ◽  
Benedetta E. Palladino ◽  
Androulla Eleftheriou ◽  
Annalaura Nocentini ◽  
Ersilia Menesini
Keyword(s):  
Privacy Protection ◽  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Personal Information ◽  
Parental Mediation ◽  
Online Privacy ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Attitudes And Beliefs ◽  
Privacy Management ◽  
Scientific Databases

Abstract. The amount of personal information shared online every day by youths without control has raised concerns about their vulnerability to privacy disclosure. Parental mediation strategies have been considered as important aspects that can contribute to the reduction of online-related risks. However, research on this field has shown puzzling results and there is not a consistent investigation of the specific role of parental mediation in youths’ online privacy management. Therefore, this systematic review was aimed at examining the evidence for associations between different parental mediation strategies and aspects of both privacy disclosure and protection. The search was conducted in December 2019 in the SCOPUS and Web of Science scientific databases and resulted in 17 studies that have been included in our review. Taken together, the results confirm that mediation practices can be considered as important variables for the reduction of information disclosure and for enhancing privacy protection. However, some specificities emerged. Restrictive forms of mediation showed clear negative associations with disclosing behaviors, whereas active strategies showed more contrasting results. Moreover, restrictive practices seemed to be less linked to attitudes and beliefs of privacy protection than active forms. More research is needed concerning the role of co-viewing strategies. Findings were discussed in terms of future research and intervention.

Tweens' Online Privacy Risks and the Role of Parental Mediation

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 632-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wonsun Shin ◽  
Jisu Huh ◽  
Ronald J. Faber
Keyword(s):  
Parental Mediation ◽  
Online Privacy ◽  
Privacy Risks

scholarly journals VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL? AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE ROLE OF PRIVACY LITERACY AND PRIVACY SELF-EFFICACY ON THE DIMENSIONALITY OF PRIVACY

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Epstein ◽  
Kelly Quinn
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Representative Sample ◽  
Empirical Investigation ◽  
Privacy Concern ◽  
Privacy Concerns ◽  
Explanatory Factors ◽  
Privacy Behaviors ◽  
Different Levels

The goals of this study are two-fold. We extend established models linking attitudes related to privacy concerns and privacy protecting behavior (PPB) by (a) differentiating between horizontal (social) and vertical (institutional) orientations of PPB as capturing an aspect of privacy multidimensionality, and (b) introducing additional explanatory factors such as privacy literacy and privacy self-efficacy into the modeling of PPB. We survey a representative sample of 686 US social media users to test relationships between privacy concern, trust, privacy self-efficacy, privacy literacy, and vertical and horizontal PPB. We find privacy concerns contribute to horizontal and vertical PPB at different levels, reinforcing the dimensionality of privacy. We also find that privacy literacy and privacy self-efficacy are important factors in explaining dimensional privacy behaviors and moderate the established relationships between privacy concerns and PPB.

The Role of Service Recovery in Online Privacy Violation

2019 ◽  
pp. 1498-1527
Author(s):  
Bidyut B Hazarika ◽  
James Gerlach ◽  
Lawrence F. Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
Perceived Risk ◽  
Service Failure ◽  
Service Recovery ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Online Privacy ◽  
Repurchase Intentions ◽  
Consumer Complaints ◽  
Recovery Strategies ◽  
Privacy Violation

In this study, the authors address the question of whether firms may successfully pursue service recovery strategies after severe online privacy violations. The study treats online privacy violations as a service failure and uses justice theory to measure repurchasing intention after consumer complaints in three different scenarios. The three scenarios differ in the sense that the accountability and the outcome of the service failure are different. The results indicate that despite the different instances of online privacy violation in each scenario, the service recovery efforts consistently created satisfaction with service recovery, significantly increased consumer trust, decreased perceived risk and increased repurchase intentions. The study finds that that both distributive and procedural justice plays an important role in online service recovery while interactional justice did not have any impact. Finally, even in cases of severe online privacy violation service recovery plays an important role generating repurchase intentions.

The Role of Service Recovery in Online Privacy Violation

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Bidyut B Hazarika ◽  
James Gerlach ◽  
Lawrence Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
Perceived Risk ◽  
Service Failure ◽  
Service Recovery ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Online Privacy ◽  
Consumer Trust ◽  
Repurchase Intentions ◽  
Consumer Complaints ◽  
Privacy Violation

In this study, the authors address the question of whether firms may successfully pursue service recovery strategies after severe online privacy violations. The study treats online privacy violations as a service failure and uses justice theory to measure repurchasing intention after consumer complaints in three different scenarios. The three scenarios differ in the sense that the accountability and the outcome of the service failure are different. The results indicate that despite the different instances of online privacy violation in each scenario, the service recovery efforts consistently created satisfaction with service recovery, significantly increased consumer trust, decreased perceived risk and increased repurchase intentions. The study finds that that both distributive and procedural justice plays an important role in online service recovery while interactional justice did not have any impact. Finally, even in cases of severe online privacy violation service recovery plays an important role generating repurchase intentions.

Online Privacy Literacy and Online Privacy Behavior – The Role of Crystallized Intelligence and Personality

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Cornelia Sindermann ◽  
Helena Sophia Schmitt ◽  
Frank Kargl ◽  
Cornelia Herbert ◽  
Christian Montag
Keyword(s):  
Online Privacy ◽  
Crystallized Intelligence
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document